Will America vote for Kamala Harris in 2024? This is the real question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She couldn’t run a campaign that could last until Iowa. If nothing major happens in foreign affairs, she’ll be okay. But it’s not likely she’ll be reelected and she’ll probably be challenged during the primary.

We are getting ahead of ourselves. I can't believe Joe will choose Kamala again. He's not suicidal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She couldn’t run a campaign that could last until Iowa. If nothing major happens in foreign affairs, she’ll be okay. But it’s not likely she’ll be reelected and she’ll probably be challenged during the primary.

We are getting ahead of ourselves. I can't believe Joe will choose Kamala again. He's not suicidal.

Lol. He is running with her right now.

You all explained to us morons that "no serious person" thinks Biden will run again, while Biden was talking about running again. Now we hear he certainly won't run with Kamala, while he's literally running with her, campaigning with her, etc. Biden is doing all the things he is doing. He is doing them. You can't convince us otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, majority will elect VP Harris in 2024- on the Biden/ Harris 2024 ticket. Biden isn't going anywhere.

Right wing media bashing aside (anything Fox, WSJ, NY Post, etc.), Harris would be better than ANY Republican.

OMG. I actually laughed out loud. It's a shame you're not aware of how the VAST majority of Democrats feel. No one wants Biden, much less Harris.
NP

I'm worried about Biden's age, and I'm not sure if Harris would be a good President, but no way am I going to vote for Trump!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, majority will elect VP Harris in 2024- on the Biden/ Harris 2024 ticket. Biden isn't going anywhere.

Right wing media bashing aside (anything Fox, WSJ, NY Post, etc.), Harris would be better than ANY Republican.

OMG. I actually laughed out loud. It's a shame you're not aware of how the VAST majority of Democrats feel. No one wants Biden, much less Harris.
NP

I'm worried about Biden's age, and I'm not sure if Harris would be a good President, but no way am I going to vote for Trump!!

Bless your heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She couldn’t run a campaign that could last until Iowa. If nothing major happens in foreign affairs, she’ll be okay. But it’s not likely she’ll be reelected and she’ll probably be challenged during the primary.

We are getting ahead of ourselves. I can't believe Joe will choose Kamala again. He's not suicidal.

Lol. He is running with her right now.

You all explained to us morons that "no serious person" thinks Biden will run again, while Biden was talking about running again. Now we hear he certainly won't run with Kamala, while he's literally running with her, campaigning with her, etc. Biden is doing all the things he is doing. He is doing them. You can't convince us otherwise.

DP. You're right, he is. We keep saying he won't do them because we keep expecting him to wake up from the fog he seems to constantly be in and make the right decision. But so far, he just continues to double-down on all the wrong decisions. You are correct that he is indeed running, and Kamala Harris is indeed going to be his running mate again. And the rest of us are just watching this trainwreck in disbelief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Why is the VP so frequently referred to by her first name rather than her last?
I noticed this too when Hilary Clinton was running, but figured maybe her last name could be confusing as a Clinton was already president in somewhat recent history.

But with Harris? It is hard to think of a reason other than her gender...

Um... Hillary ran on being "HILLARY." That was literally the name she chose to be on her campaign signs. And plenty of people refer to Biden as "Joe" - not to mention all the Dems referring to Trump as "Don," etc. So, Kamala it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure that Biden has said he's only on the ballot to prevent Trump from returning to the White House. If Trump were to be blocked from running again, then I think Biden would retire.

However, I don't think Harris is popular enough. I think that if Biden dropped out, Whitmer would be the primary contender to take the Democratic nomination and beat Nikki Haley (or Ron DeSantis). Other than Andy Beshear (who continues to claim he won't run), I think Whitmer is the strongest contender after Biden and Trump.

Is it that whitmer is a white woman. That’s the only reason she would be a contender over harris.

Or it could be the fact that Harris is an idiot.

+1000

+2000
Anyone claiming she's a capable, serious person needs their head examined.

I'm not a huge fan of Harris myself, but these kinds of comments make me snicker. Of course she is a capable serious person. Have you seen her bio? She didn't just pop up out of nowhere on the VP ticket.

You may not like her, but this is silly.

Sorry, I have yet to see the "capable, serious" Kamala Harris. All we've seen is rambling, absurd word salads and hyena cackling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure that Biden has said he's only on the ballot to prevent Trump from returning to the White House. If Trump were to be blocked from running again, then I think Biden would retire.

However, I don't think Harris is popular enough. I think that if Biden dropped out, Whitmer would be the primary contender to take the Democratic nomination and beat Nikki Haley (or Ron DeSantis). Other than Andy Beshear (who continues to claim he won't run), I think Whitmer is the strongest contender after Biden and Trump.

Is it that whitmer is a white woman. That’s the only reason she would be a contender over harris.

Or it could be the fact that Harris is an idiot.

I’m a nonwhite woman. I think both are true - a woman can win, but not a woman AND a minority. One or the other. And I honestly don’t care. I am fine with this being the state of the world for now, progress is incremental.

I also agree that Harris is a quintessential diversity hire who is not a substantively good candidate and has been a huge disappointment. I don’t want her to be president.

Diversity hire? Harris has been an ELECTED official - in a state with a 6% black population. And she'll be a two-term VP. And...maybe president one day.

You can start gnashing your teeth now.

I’m the PP you’re responding to. Yes, a diversity hire. Biden very nakedly chose her as his VP to pander to the identity politics faction of the Democratic Party. I have no doubt that she’s an ambitious and intelligent person, and yes, she was an elected official. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t a diversity hire for her current role. And she has not proven herself to be a great fit for the job either. She comes off as an empty suit. I voted for HRC in 2016, and in my view there is a stark difference between the two of them in competency, presence, and who I would want picking up the phone at 3 AM, to quote an old HRC ad.

I’m a Democrat. I’ll reluctantly vote for the Biden/Harris ticket over Trump or any of the insane Republicans who are running in 2024, but truthfully I am not confident that Biden will live through 2028 and I really do not want Harris to be president. She’s fine as a senator or ambassador or even a cabinet head, but I don’t feel great about having her in charge.

What has she actually done in her role as VP that makes you question her competence?

Just because someone is an underrepresented minority, and that is viewed as a plus by some, does not mean the person is not qualified or competent. Those of you continuously saying that she's an idiot or lacks competence or was merely a diversity hire, please tell us, in what ways is she actually unqualified for the job? Or are you maybe just a bigot who can't possibly see a Black woman as competent?

I'm the PP you're responding to. I'm the child of Indian immigrants, so I also consider Harris to be an Indian woman as equally as she is a Black woman, and from an identity politics perspective I would have been happy to see her succeed. Of course I agree that one can be "diverse" and also good at their job - I just do not think Harris is one of those people. And I reject your implication that criticizing her makes me "a bigot who can't possibly see a Black woman as competent" and I think this tired argument epitomizes the Democratic party's general problems with DEI and their constant racial pandering. If you think it's racist, it's your problem to live with. I'm not changing my opinion because of you, and there are many others like me who think similarly and also vote.

She's qualified on paper. Yes, I recognize that she was a prosecutor and that she held national office. I don't think she's a bad politician. She is certainly much smarter and more articulate than Trump, but "better than Trump" is not the bar I use for determining whether someone is actually a good candidate for president. She does not seem to have achieved any substantive policy accomplishments. Biden very publicly handed her the border/Central America to "own" as VP, and while that may have been an unfair assignment, in my view she has done absolutely nothing to help or even steer the conversation in the right direction. This is a critical issue, both optically for the Democrats and substantively for our country. She's done nothing else of substance that I can point to as She's also a bad communicator. She's especially bad at dealing with tough questions and criticism. Her interviews are borderline embarrassing. Biden isn't great, either, but again - I'm looking at her on her own merits. I wouldn't be happy to have her negotiating with Putin or Xi or really anyone on behalf of the country.

+1 Enough with false cries of racism any time someone doesn't 100% agree with you. It's overplayed and shrieking it about means nothing now.

+2 False claims of racism AND misogyny. As if women and POC are somehow protected from criticism when they fail to do a good job. Ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure that Biden has said he's only on the ballot to prevent Trump from returning to the White House. If Trump were to be blocked from running again, then I think Biden would retire.

However, I don't think Harris is popular enough. I think that if Biden dropped out, Whitmer would be the primary contender to take the Democratic nomination and beat Nikki Haley (or Ron DeSantis). Other than Andy Beshear (who continues to claim he won't run), I think Whitmer is the strongest contender after Biden and Trump.

Is it that whitmer is a white woman. That’s the only reason she would be a contender over harris.

Or it could be the fact that Harris is an idiot.

+1000

+2000
Anyone claiming she's a capable, serious person needs their head examined.

I'm not a huge fan of Harris myself, but these kinds of comments make me snicker. Of course she is a capable serious person. Have you seen her bio? She didn't just pop up out of nowhere on the VP ticket.

You may not like her, but this is silly.

Sorry, I have yet to see the "capable, serious" Kamala Harris. All we've seen is rambling, absurd word salads and hyena cackling.

All you've chosen to view are edited out of context Fox News parodies of VP Harris.

If you were an informed person on matters of politics, the PPs post would resonate.

Go back to Brietbart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure that Biden has said he's only on the ballot to prevent Trump from returning to the White House. If Trump were to be blocked from running again, then I think Biden would retire.

However, I don't think Harris is popular enough. I think that if Biden dropped out, Whitmer would be the primary contender to take the Democratic nomination and beat Nikki Haley (or Ron DeSantis). Other than Andy Beshear (who continues to claim he won't run), I think Whitmer is the strongest contender after Biden and Trump.

Is it that whitmer is a white woman. That’s the only reason she would be a contender over harris.

Or it could be the fact that Harris is an idiot.

+1000

+2000
Anyone claiming she's a capable, serious person needs their head examined.

I'm not a huge fan of Harris myself, but these kinds of comments make me snicker. Of course she is a capable serious person. Have you seen her bio? She didn't just pop up out of nowhere on the VP ticket.

You may not like her, but this is silly.

Sorry, I have yet to see the "capable, serious" Kamala Harris. All we've seen is rambling, absurd word salads and hyena cackling.

+1

[Anonymous]

George Will annoys me a bit, but there's quote by him:

"Have you ever voted for someone, or not voted for someone, because of their VP running mate? Um, no... not really.... Do you know anyone who has?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She couldn’t run a campaign that could last until Iowa. If nothing major happens in foreign affairs, she’ll be okay. But it’s not likely she’ll be reelected and she’ll probably be challenged during the primary.

We are getting ahead of ourselves. I can't believe Joe will choose Kamala again. He's not suicidal.

Lol. He is running with her right now.

You all explained to us morons that "no serious person" thinks Biden will run again, while Biden was talking about running again. Now we hear he certainly won't run with Kamala, while he's literally running with her, campaigning with her, etc. Biden is doing all the things he is doing. He is doing them. You can't convince us otherwise.

DP. You're right, he is. We keep saying he won't do them because we keep expecting him to wake up from the fog he seems to constantly be in and make the right decision. But so far, he just continues to double-down on all the wrong decisions. You are correct that he is indeed running, and Kamala Harris is indeed going to be his running mate again. And the rest of us are just watching this trainwreck in disbelief.

That scenario has a probability of 99%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:George Will annoys me a bit, but there's quote by him:

"Have you ever voted for someone, or not voted for someone, because of their VP running mate? Um, no... not really.... Do you know anyone who has?"

Actually, remember Sarah Palin?

[Anonymous]

Not a huge Harris fan or anything, but I will do whatever it takes to keep Trump out of the presidency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a huge Harris fan or anything, but I will do whatever it takes to keep Trump out of the presidency.

What, if anything, would Harris change?