Rep. Lauren Boebert to divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom on social media that came up on my feed — boetcher?

She’s 34 with four kids , had her first at 17

Biologically it seems 17,18, 19 is peak time to have a kid if you want your body to recover with no stress

Please don't comment publicly if you are not knowledgeable.

According to the World Health Organization:

"Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition."

The World Health Organization based their scientific findings on females that had given birth.

that is called science, not politics.

Physiologically, there is a big difference between a 10 and 19 year old. That is such a strange grouping unless the author is trying to make a point and needs to group in young girls in order to make the statistics work

💯

Clumping 10-19 is doing bad science on purpose for political reasons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ideal physically, not economically

2nd and 3rd wave feminism failed by focusing too much on trying to force women to become more like men and “lean in” instead of re-structuring the economy in a fundamental way such that 20-24 is economically viable for women to start families

I made six-figures at my first job out of undergrad & had no student debt.

There is nothing that would’ve made me want to marry or have babies at that age.

+100 There is no reason to jump in to marriage/children so early other than to be controlled and poor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL okay which part is false?

OOOOO. He's telling teacher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL okay which part is false?

Is he not a White nationalist? Is he not a pastor for Trump? Is he not dating Boebert? The world may never know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom on social media that came up on my feed — boetcher?

She’s 34 with four kids , had her first at 17

Biologically it seems 17,18, 19 is peak time to have a kid if you want your body to recover with no stress

Please don't comment publicly if you are not knowledgeable.

According to the World Health Organization:

"Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition."

Physiologically, there is a big difference between a 10 and 19 year old. That is such a strange grouping unless the author is trying to make a point and needs to group in young girls in order to make the statistics work

💯

Clumping 10-19 is doing bad science on purpose for political reasons.

What on earth? No, although it’s far better for a 19 year old to give birth than it is for a 10 year old to give birth, outcomes for pregnant 19 year olds is still much worse than it is for a 20 something. The teenaged body is still very immature in a lot of ways. So it’s not bad science, it’s pointing out that teen pregnancy is bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom on social media that came up on my feed — boetcher?

She’s 34 with four kids , had her first at 17

Biologically it seems 17,18, 19 is peak time to have a kid if you want your body to recover with no stress

Please don't comment publicly if you are not knowledgeable.

According to the World Health Organization:

"Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition."

m’eh, the WHO also said the covid vaccines would be “over 95% effective in stopping transmission and infection of covid 19” … so it’s not as though WHO has a lot of credibility at the moment.

I wish I’d had my kids earlier for the faster recovery. And being an empty nester before 60 is something I’ll never achieve.

There is quite a distance between pregnant at 17 and pregnant after 40. I don't think dropping out of high school for a faster recovery is showing common sense, hon.

pp quoting also knows that women are told not have kids at 20-24 either even tho who says that’s ideal.

There is just bad advice given by all sides on this issue

20-24 is also ideal for finishing college, getting a MA, experiencing the world, traveling, living abroad, getting your career going. Try doing any of that with kids in tow. Sure you can. Especially if you are a man whose partner does all the child rearing. A lot harder when you are a woman and are expecting to take care of kids and a man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom on social media that came up on my feed — boetcher?

She’s 34 with four kids , had her first at 17

Biologically it seems 17,18, 19 is peak time to have a kid if you want your body to recover with no stress

Please don't comment publicly if you are not knowledgeable.

According to the World Health Organization:

"Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition."

m’eh, the WHO also said the covid vaccines would be “over 95% effective in stopping transmission and infection of covid 19” … so it’s not as though WHO has a lot of credibility at the moment.

I wish I’d had my kids earlier for the faster recovery. And being an empty nester before 60 is something I’ll never achieve.

There is quite a distance between pregnant at 17 and pregnant after 40. I don't think dropping out of high school for a faster recovery is showing common sense, hon.

pp quoting also knows that women are told not have kids at 20-24 either even tho who says that’s ideal.

There is just bad advice given by all sides on this issue

20-24 is also ideal for finishing college, getting a MA, experiencing the world, traveling, living abroad, getting your career going. Try doing any of that with kids in tow. Sure you can. Especially if you are a man whose partner does all the child rearing. A lot harder when you are a woman and are expecting to take care of kids and a man.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL okay which part is false?

All hat, no cattle. He would never want to open himself to discovery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The GOP continues to be the pro-marriage, Christian values party and leads by example:

https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/16/lauren-boebert-divorce-filing/

Why are you finding this contradictory? There are a lot of Christian families who chose to divorce. It does not mean that they are against family values or not pro-marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP continues to be the pro-marriage, Christian values party and leads by example:

https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/16/lauren-boebert-divorce-filing/

Why are you finding this contradictory? There are a lot of Christian families who chose to divorce. It does not mean that they are against family values or not pro-marriage.

It does, actually. They spend a lot of time railing against divorce, but when push comes to shove a lot of “Christians” think sleeping around, divorce, adultery, plus domestic abuse, rape and pedophilia are all acceptable things to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP continues to be the pro-marriage, Christian values party and leads by example:

https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/16/lauren-boebert-divorce-filing/

Why are you finding this contradictory? There are a lot of Christian families who chose to divorce. It does not mean that they are against family values or not pro-marriage.

It does, actually. They spend a lot of time railing against divorce, but when push comes to shove a lot of “Christians” think sleeping around, divorce, adultery, plus domestic abuse, rape and pedophilia are all acceptable things to do.

And then their LOL but not LOL defense is "oh, didn't you know? when I f*** someone else then get a divorce it's totally fine - that's still family values. but whatever YOU'RE doing you gdless heathen should be punishable by death. just follow my tweets to know what's acceptable and what warrants execution, simple as pie."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP continues to be the pro-marriage, Christian values party and leads by example:

https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/16/lauren-boebert-divorce-filing/

Why are you finding this contradictory? There are a lot of Christian families who chose to divorce. It does not mean that they are against family values or not pro-marriage.

It does, actually. They spend a lot of time railing against divorce, but when push comes to shove a lot of “Christians” think sleeping around, divorce, adultery, plus domestic abuse, rape and pedophilia are all acceptable things to do.

You... don't know any actual Christians.

They think divorce is regrettable but sometimes necessary, just like you do.

They don't think ANY of that other stuff is acceptable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP continues to be the pro-marriage, Christian values party and leads by example:

https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/16/lauren-boebert-divorce-filing/

Why are you finding this contradictory? There are a lot of Christian families who chose to divorce. It does not mean that they are against family values or not pro-marriage.

It does, actually. They spend a lot of time railing against divorce, but when push comes to shove a lot of “Christians” think sleeping around, divorce, adultery, plus domestic abuse, rape and pedophilia are all acceptable things to do.

You... don't know any actual Christians.

They think divorce is regrettable but sometimes necessary, just like you do.

They don't think ANY of that other stuff is acceptable.

They don’t? Maybe they don’t like it in theory, but never enough to stop giving money and support to their churches when their leaders do it.

I wish these same “Christians” would recognize that abortion is regrettable, but sometimes necessary, too. After all, Jesus had nothing to say on abortion, but he was quite clear where he stood on marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP continues to be the pro-marriage, Christian values party and leads by example:

https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/16/lauren-boebert-divorce-filing/

Why are you finding this contradictory? There are a lot of Christian families who chose to divorce. It does not mean that they are against family values or not pro-marriage.

It does, actually. They spend a lot of time railing against divorce, but when push comes to shove a lot of “Christians” think sleeping around, divorce, adultery, plus domestic abuse, rape and pedophilia are all acceptable things to do.

You... don't know any actual Christians.

They think divorce is regrettable but sometimes necessary, just like you do.

They don't think ANY of that other stuff is acceptable.

They don’t? Maybe they don’t like it in theory, but never enough to stop giving money and support to their churches when their leaders do it.

[I don't know any Christians who like those things in fact, let alone in theory. Do you have a specific example of a church leader who did any of that stuff and remained a church leader? ]

I wish these same “Christians” would recognize that abortion is regrettable, but sometimes necessary, too. After all, Jesus had nothing to say on abortion, but he was quite clear where he stood on marriage.

[Jesus was clearly against murder.]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP continues to be the pro-marriage, Christian values party and leads by example:

https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/16/lauren-boebert-divorce-filing/

Why are you finding this contradictory? There are a lot of Christian families who chose to divorce. It does not mean that they are against family values or not pro-marriage.

It does, actually. They spend a lot of time railing against divorce, but when push comes to shove a lot of “Christians” think sleeping around, divorce, adultery, plus domestic abuse, rape and pedophilia are all acceptable things to do.

If people think all that is acceptable they are not Christian. I don't know if she ever was railing against divorce. Do you have a proof of that?