Rep. Lauren Boebert to divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom on social media that came up on my feed — boetcher?

She’s 34 with four kids , had her first at 17

Biologically it seems 17,18, 19 is peak time to have a kid if you want your body to recover with no stress

Please don't comment publicly if you are not knowledgeable.

According to the World Health Organization:

"Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition."

Physiologically, there is a big difference between a 10 and 19 year old. That is such a strange grouping unless the author is trying to make a point and needs to group in young girls in order to make the statistics work

💯

Clumping 10-19 is doing bad science on purpose for political reasons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom on social media that came up on my feed — boetcher?

She’s 34 with four kids , had her first at 17

Biologically it seems 17,18, 19 is peak time to have a kid if you want your body to recover with no stress

Please don't comment publicly if you are not knowledgeable.

According to the World Health Organization:

"Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition."

m’eh, the WHO also said the covid vaccines would be “over 95% effective in stopping transmission and infection of covid 19” … so it’s not as though WHO has a lot of credibility at the moment.

I wish I’d had my kids earlier for the faster recovery. And being an empty nester before 60 is something I’ll never achieve.

There is quite a distance between pregnant at 17 and pregnant after 40. I don't think dropping out of high school for a faster recovery is showing common sense, hon.

pp quoting also knows that women are told not have kids at 20-24 either even tho who says that’s ideal.

There is just bad advice given by all sides on this issue

[Anonymous]

Ideal physically, not economically

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ideal physically, not economically

2nd and 3rd wave feminism failed by focusing too much on trying to force women to become more like men and “lean in” instead of re-structuring the economy in a fundamental way such that 20-24 is economically viable for women to start families

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ideal physically, not economically

2nd and 3rd wave feminism failed by focusing too much on trying to force women to become more like men and “lean in” instead of re-structuring the economy in a fundamental way such that 20-24 is economically viable for women to start families

This is the case in most industrialized nations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UMC Democrats are very conservative/traditional

Ask them about tattoos, piercings, divorce, premarital sex, having kids with multiple partners, how kids should address adults

I dunno - lotta thots work on dem campaigns and sleep around and come from umc families.

Statistically, red states have much earlier avg ages of first sexual activity, pregnancy, drinking etc

I’m just reporting what happens on dem campaigns from first hand experience.

Yes your first hand experience with women you call 'thots'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ideal physically, not economically

2nd and 3rd wave feminism failed by focusing too much on trying to force women to become more like men and “lean in” instead of re-structuring the economy in a fundamental way such that 20-24 is economically viable for women to start families

I made six-figures at my first job out of undergrad & had no student debt.

There is nothing that would’ve made me want to marry or have babies at that age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ideal physically, not economically

2nd and 3rd wave feminism failed by focusing too much on trying to force women to become more like men and “lean in” instead of re-structuring the economy in a fundamental way such that 20-24 is economically viable for women to start families

I made six-figures at my first job out of undergrad & had no student debt.

There is nothing that would’ve made me want to marry or have babies at that age.

I think gen z and gen aa will have a different outlook after seeing millennial and gen x moms

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ideal physically, not economically

2nd and 3rd wave feminism failed by focusing too much on trying to force women to become more like men and “lean in” instead of re-structuring the economy in a fundamental way such that 20-24 is economically viable for women to start families

I don't think 'lean in' is the reason women aren't having babies 20-24. Only a quarter of women are even married at that age, and that's across all income groups. So looking at college graduates, it's even lower.

I don't think you are going to restructure the economy enough to have babies during or straight out of college then suddenly jump back into grad school or a career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ideal physically, not economically

2nd and 3rd wave feminism failed by focusing too much on trying to force women to become more like men and “lean in” instead of re-structuring the economy in a fundamental way such that 20-24 is economically viable for women to start families

I made six-figures at my first job out of undergrad & had no student debt.

There is nothing that would’ve made me want to marry or have babies at that age.

I think gen z and gen aa will have a different outlook after seeing millennial and gen x moms

I’ve seen no indication of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UMC Democrats are very conservative/traditional

Ask them about tattoos, piercings, divorce, premarital sex, having kids with multiple partners, how kids should address adults

I dunno - lotta thots work on dem campaigns and sleep around and come from umc families.

Statistically, red states have much earlier avg ages of first sexual activity, pregnancy, drinking etc

I’m just reporting what happens on dem campaigns from first hand experience.

Right, Jethro, you have first hand experience. Very believeable.

[Anonymous]

LOL okay which part is false?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he still going to keep his $400,000/year “consulting” gig?

She asked for child support, so I guess the plan is that the grift continues.

Child support for what. Didn’t her last child just have a baby with his fifteen year old girlfriend

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a mom on social media that came up on my feed — boetcher?

She’s 34 with four kids , had her first at 17

Biologically it seems 17,18, 19 is peak time to have a kid if you want your body to recover with no stress

Please don't comment publicly if you are not knowledgeable.

According to the World Health Organization:

"Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition."

m’eh, the WHO also said the covid vaccines would be “over 95% effective in stopping transmission and infection of covid 19” … so it’s not as though WHO has a lot of credibility at the moment.

I wish I’d had my kids earlier for the faster recovery. And being an empty nester before 60 is something I’ll never achieve.

Sorry to interject data into the discussion.

It can be annoying, I realize, when it runs counter to your opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he still going to keep his $400,000/year “consulting” gig?

She asked for child support, so I guess the plan is that the grift continues.

Child support for what. Didn’t her last child just have a baby with his fifteen year old girlfriend

That’s the first child, who does not appear to be the husband’s. Not sure who is caring for the grandchild (if born)