Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Our school did a similar field trip this year, but it was really great. The museum has a great program where they really went into detail about certain paintings. I think it’s way better than having kids randomly wander around. They learned a lot and really learned how to appreciate paintings.
But to go all the way to the museum and spent less than an hour there and only see 2-3 paintings sounds really lame to me. Do you work at Gatehouse? Like sure, start the program that way, then let them see the rest of the museum!
I was a chaperone and definitely don’t work at gatehouse (I think most of them should be let go). We were at the museum for more than an hour. Probably closer to two. And it was pretty great. The other parents thought so too. And the kids were pretty engaged and happy to be on a field trip. Did your buses get stuck in traffic or something?
You were at the museum for two hours and only saw three paintings, and thought it was great?
DP: I didn't go on this field trip, but as an artist and an art educator, getting students to look deeply at and discuss a work of art in detail is what we want. They probably used a rich discussion process that got students talking and thinking about the work and making connections. That's what makes an artwork meaningful and memorable. I'm sure students walked by and "saw" many other artworks in the museum as it's not likely to be three pieces right next to each other, they just focused in detail on those few.
As an artist and art educator, do you think the field trip described by the parent who spent less than an hour at the museum was well-designed?
There was one parent who described it positively which sounded like a fairly well-designed experience to me (though not much info so who knows) and another parent who said their bus got stuck in traffic and the docent was late which obviously is not. But the second one sounded like there were obvious logistic problems (at least from the parents' accounting), so more a matter of luck/disorganization than FCPS design.
I was just responding to "seeing just 3 pieces" aspect--that's about how many art pieces kids could meaningfully look at and discuss. I think being in the institution, learning the norms for behavior and absorbing some of the work they walk past also has some value--especially for kids without prior art museum experience. And most kids don't really have more than an hour in them to look at and talk about art. My own children are now teenagers who love art museums and will spend a lot of time in them, but as young kids I would take them and we'd only look at 2-3 pieces, talk about them, sketch in a sketchbook in response and only stay for 30 min to an hour unless we popped into the museum cafe. Spending a long day in an art museum is a way to get many young kids not to ever want to go again is what I found.
I personally like it when they include a studio making response to the art to help extend the experience, but with large groups that's not really possible. The art teacher might extend what they did on the field trip in their next class---that is what happened when my kids were in ES (they are in HS now).