The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I for one find it really amusing that the Republicans control the House but are so incompetent that, instead of holding hearings, they just abdicate in full to a media organization owned and controlled by a foreign billionaire. Kind of amazing.

They are holding hearings, nitwit.

Several. On issues that Democrats SHOULD have held hearings for the past 2 years:
The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan
The total lack of border security
The fentanyl crisis
Fraud in the pandemic relief payments
Weaponization of the federal government
Biden family business and influence peddling

These are just a few. Buckle up.

And, who is this "foreign billionaire" of which you speak?

The democrats actually had hearings and produced bills most of these topics. The GOP voted against those bills. What is your issue?

The disasterous withdrawal from Afghanistan was at the hands of Pompeo and Trump who undercut the Afghan government and left the mess for Biden and the Pentagon to deal with.
There isn't a lack of border security. In fact, Biden even got Mexico to pay over a billion dollars to help improve things.
The fentynal crisis has been going on for a decade. What did Trump do about it? Nothing. In fact, there is Chinese fentanyl, mexican fentanyl and US fentanyl. The Dems have tried to get more funding for drug interdiction and medical funds to deal with it. The GOP votes against it.
Fraud in the Pandemic: DOJ is now working on it. Why didn't the Trump Administration support the controls the Dems in the Congress tried to impose on those monies?
Wepaonization of the Federal Government, like how the FBI broke protocol to announce an investigation into Hillary a month before the 2016 election, only to admit that it was nothing months later? Sure, let's talk about that.
Biden Family Business- sure when there are Biden family members working in the white house while gaining foreign patents and trademarks or using the weight of the US foreign policy to extract monies for a personal real estate bail out, we can talk about it. In fact, why did President Trump pay more taxes to China than the US?

Let's have these conversations, I am all for it!

BullShit.

List the hearings that they held on the topics. We will wait.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

And every person prosecuted unfairly on this BS is in pain too, as are their families

Then don't do the crime. If they have been prosecuted and been found guilty, that is our system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

Have you ever considered, just for a moment, that the family is right, the story is right, the video shows that the family is right, as well as the autopsy, and because you are getting your information from Fox "we laugh at our stupid viewers" News, maybe, just maybe YOU are wrong?

JFC. The video shows it was lies

You should probably stop with this. The video shows no such thing. The family will have their due for the malicious lies Tucker is spreading.

Lies?

He is showing the actual video. How can the video be lies? The video is time stamped.
Tucker Carlson has said nothing that isn't true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

Have you ever considered, just for a moment, that the family is right, the story is right, the video shows that the family is right, as well as the autopsy, and because you are getting your information from Fox "we laugh at our stupid viewers" News, maybe, just maybe YOU are wrong?

JFC. The video shows it was lies

Nope, selectively showing a few seconds of over 40,000 hours of footage can provide a skewed version of events. That is what Tucker is feeding you, and despite his being an admitted liar, you are believing him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I for one find it really amusing that the Republicans control the House but are so incompetent that, instead of holding hearings, they just abdicate in full to a media organization owned and controlled by a foreign billionaire. Kind of amazing.

They are holding hearings, nitwit.

Several. On issues that Democrats SHOULD have held hearings for the past 2 years:
The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan
The total lack of border security
The fentanyl crisis
Fraud in the pandemic relief payments
Weaponization of the federal government
Biden family business and influence peddling

These are just a few. Buckle up.

And, who is this "foreign billionaire" of which you speak?

The democrats actually had hearings and produced bills most of these topics. The GOP voted against those bills. What is your issue?

The disasterous withdrawal from Afghanistan was at the hands of Pompeo and Trump who undercut the Afghan government and left the mess for Biden and the Pentagon to deal with.
There isn't a lack of border security. In fact, Biden even got Mexico to pay over a billion dollars to help improve things.
The fentynal crisis has been going on for a decade. What did Trump do about it? Nothing. In fact, there is Chinese fentanyl, mexican fentanyl and US fentanyl. The Dems have tried to get more funding for drug interdiction and medical funds to deal with it. The GOP votes against it.
Fraud in the Pandemic: DOJ is now working on it. Why didn't the Trump Administration support the controls the Dems in the Congress tried to impose on those monies?
Wepaonization of the Federal Government, like how the FBI broke protocol to announce an investigation into Hillary a month before the 2016 election, only to admit that it was nothing months later? Sure, let's talk about that.
Biden Family Business- sure when there are Biden family members working in the white house while gaining foreign patents and trademarks or using the weight of the US foreign policy to extract monies for a personal real estate bail out, we can talk about it. In fact, why did President Trump pay more taxes to China than the US?

Let's have these conversations, I am all for it!

BullShit.

List the hearings that they held on the topics. We will wait.

Try us9ing the google machine. It isn't hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

And every person prosecuted unfairly on this BS is in pain too, as are their families

Then don't do the crime. If they have been prosecuted and been found guilty, that is our system.

And, they were prosecuted without their attorneys having access to video that could well exonerate them or, at a minimum, prove that they did not realize they were doing anything wrong since they were, you know, welcomed into the Capitol.

[Anonymous]

The Dems have no issue with what about ism so here is a few for them.

They seem to have no issue with the radical far left who rioted and destroyed property when Trump was inaugurated.

They seem to have no issue with the far left radicals who actually set of a bomb in the Senate building in 1983 nor do they have an issue with the fact Clinton pardoned those convicted.

They also have no issue with the fact the bomb went off outside an office of a former leader of the Klan who was the longest serving member in Congress. Let’s see Dems can apologize for their abhorrent behavior and get a pass.

The hypocrisy never ever stops!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I for one find it really amusing that the Republicans control the House but are so incompetent that, instead of holding hearings, they just abdicate in full to a media organization owned and controlled by a foreign billionaire. Kind of amazing.

They are holding hearings, nitwit.

Several. On issues that Democrats SHOULD have held hearings for the past 2 years:
The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan
The total lack of border security
The fentanyl crisis
Fraud in the pandemic relief payments
Weaponization of the federal government
Biden family business and influence peddling

These are just a few. Buckle up.

And, who is this "foreign billionaire" of which you speak?

The democrats actually had hearings and produced bills most of these topics. The GOP voted against those bills. What is your issue?

The disasterous withdrawal from Afghanistan was at the hands of Pompeo and Trump who undercut the Afghan government and left the mess for Biden and the Pentagon to deal with.
There isn't a lack of border security. In fact, Biden even got Mexico to pay over a billion dollars to help improve things.
The fentynal crisis has been going on for a decade. What did Trump do about it? Nothing. In fact, there is Chinese fentanyl, mexican fentanyl and US fentanyl. The Dems have tried to get more funding for drug interdiction and medical funds to deal with it. The GOP votes against it.
Fraud in the Pandemic: DOJ is now working on it. Why didn't the Trump Administration support the controls the Dems in the Congress tried to impose on those monies?
Wepaonization of the Federal Government, like how the FBI broke protocol to announce an investigation into Hillary a month before the 2016 election, only to admit that it was nothing months later? Sure, let's talk about that.
Biden Family Business- sure when there are Biden family members working in the white house while gaining foreign patents and trademarks or using the weight of the US foreign policy to extract monies for a personal real estate bail out, we can talk about it. In fact, why did President Trump pay more taxes to China than the US?

Let's have these conversations, I am all for it!

BullShit.

List the hearings that they held on the topics. We will wait.

Try us9ing the google machine. It isn't hard.

Oh, honey. You made the claim. You know damn well that the Democrats in Congress held NOT ONE HEARING on any of the topics listed. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I for one find it really amusing that the Republicans control the House but are so incompetent that, instead of holding hearings, they just abdicate in full to a media organization owned and controlled by a foreign billionaire. Kind of amazing.

They are holding hearings, nitwit.

Several. On issues that Democrats SHOULD have held hearings for the past 2 years:
The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan
The total lack of border security
The fentanyl crisis
Fraud in the pandemic relief payments
Weaponization of the federal government
Biden family business and influence peddling

These are just a few. Buckle up.

And, who is this "foreign billionaire" of which you speak?

If you don’t know who owns Fox News, you really don’t know anything about anything.

If you are speaking of Rupert Murdoch, he is an American citizen and has been for nearly 40 years.
Do you refer to all immigrants as "foreigners?"

No, you’re right, just the brown ones. I misspoke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

Have you ever considered, just for a moment, that the family is right, the story is right, the video shows that the family is right, as well as the autopsy, and because you are getting your information from Fox "we laugh at our stupid viewers" News, maybe, just maybe YOU are wrong?

JFC. The video shows it was lies

Nope, selectively showing a few seconds of over 40,000 hours of footage can provide a skewed version of events. That is what Tucker is feeding you, and despite his being an admitted liar, you are believing him.

This is actually what the J6 Committee did. And, edited them for full effect. Like adding sound to silent video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I for one find it really amusing that the Republicans control the House but are so incompetent that, instead of holding hearings, they just abdicate in full to a media organization owned and controlled by a foreign billionaire. Kind of amazing.

And, the Jan 6 committee hired an experienced ABC producer to deliver their 'findings." Even added screams to a silent tape.

What is most comical, though, was the tape of Hawley that the Jan 6 committee bragged about. The J6 group edited out the whole video which showed that Hawley was at the tail end of a large group of people running. J6 made it appear that he was the only one.

There was plenty of awful stuff for J6 to show. They didn't need to edit it the way they did.

And Harley was leaving because Capitol police were telling them to. He was one of the last ones to leave because he did not want to

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

And every person prosecuted unfairly on this BS is in pain too, as are their families

Then don't do the crime. If they have been prosecuted and been found guilty, that is our system.

And, they were prosecuted without their attorneys having access to video that could well exonerate them or, at a minimum, prove that they did not realize they were doing anything wrong since they were, you know, welcomed into the Capitol.

Or maybe the video showed them gettng blessed by red, white, and blue unicorns. Anything is possible.

But our judicial system operates in reality. So these people are all guilty and the video footage does not exonerate them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I for one find it really amusing that the Republicans control the House but are so incompetent that, instead of holding hearings, they just abdicate in full to a media organization owned and controlled by a foreign billionaire. Kind of amazing.

And, the Jan 6 committee hired an experienced ABC producer to deliver their 'findings." Even added screams to a silent tape.

What is most comical, though, was the tape of Hawley that the Jan 6 committee bragged about. The J6 group edited out the whole video which showed that Hawley was at the tail end of a large group of people running. J6 made it appear that he was the only one.

There was plenty of awful stuff for J6 to show. They didn't need to edit it the way they did.

And Harley was leaving because Capitol police were telling them to. He was one of the last ones to leave because he did not want to

Hawley. Thanks spellcheck