Is anyone following the story of the missing mother of 3?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like they found the dismemberment tools near mom's house:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11619131/Massachusetts-cops-blood-hatchet-hack-saw-rug-basement-missing-mom-three.html

A person who can murder another human being is horrific in the first place, but to hack that dead body into pieces takes a true monster. It makes me nauseous to think about it.

She was the mother of his three children, he is a monster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would the case be getting this much press if she weren't white? Don't think so.

Actually it’s because she is hot — black or white that gets attention. If she looked like Roseanne it would not make the news. It’s just another form of celebrity news.

In our misogynist culture, women are valued primarily for their appearance. That is glaringly obvious on DCUM.

Whether someone is telling a 35 year old to settle in dating, because who would want to marry a woman of that age. Or saying a female college student can major in a low paying field if she is hot enough. Or saying that a woman who savagely killed by a shark looked good for her age. Or speculating which Idaho student the murderer was likely after because of her striking good looks.

When women have probably taken their last breaths, can they FINALLY be released from people rating their appearance.

I don't think that some of you realize how awful it is for humans to be discussed like objects, put on this earth for men's entertainment or sexual gratification.

This

+1 to all of this.

[Anonymous]

Poor woman. Her life must have been a nightmare with this monster. May she rest in peace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like they found the dismemberment tools near mom's house:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11619131/Massachusetts-cops-blood-hatchet-hack-saw-rug-basement-missing-mom-three.html

A person who can murder another human being is horrific in the first place, but to hack that dead body into pieces takes a true monster. It makes me nauseous to think about it.

Awful. Just say man instead of person. As a woman, I am tired of calling them a term that also applies to me.

[Anonymous]

OMG this guy should get an extra sentence for being a moron:

It comes after it was revealed Walshe had searched the internet for 'how to dispose of a 115-pound woman's body'.

[Anonymous]

Can they arrest him for murder without a body?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can they arrest him for murder without a body?

Yes, absolutely. It’s a harder case to make but there have been murder convictions absent the body being available to ‘prove’ the death. Circumstantial evidence can be very powerful especially if you have a mountain of it. - former prosecutor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like they found the dismemberment tools near mom's house:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11619131/Massachusetts-cops-blood-hatchet-hack-saw-rug-basement-missing-mom-three.html

I wonder if his Mom was in on this? He was supposed to be close to her and she helped him financially in the past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like they found the dismemberment tools near mom's house:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11619131/Massachusetts-cops-blood-hatchet-hack-saw-rug-basement-missing-mom-three.html

I wonder if his Mom was in on this? He was supposed to be close to her and she helped him financially in the past.

That is what I am thinking. Mom is supplying the money (what happened to the $10m from the Beacon St. sale of mom's house??) - and they were currently renting. Trying not to speculate here, trying to just derive from facts that are public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can they arrest him for murder without a body?

Yes, absolutely. It’s a harder case to make but there have been murder convictions absent the body being available to ‘prove’ the death. Circumstantial evidence can be very powerful especially if you have a mountain of it. - former prosecutor

+ DNA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Drop cloths. BOOM. He did it.

What’s more significant about drop cloths than a bloody knife or a mop?

What normal family owns those? I mean, the workmen bring those with them when doing their work, but they always clean up once they have completed the job.

Clearly, NORMAL families never do their own home improvement projects.

lol right? I’ve bought drop clothes to do big painting projects and while I don’t own a mop, it’s obviously a normal thing to have at home. This is definitely a totality situation but a drop cloth is not a smoking gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can they arrest him for murder without a body?

Yes, absolutely. It’s a harder case to make but there have been murder convictions absent the body being available to ‘prove’ the death. Circumstantial evidence can be very powerful especially if you have a mountain of it. - former prosecutor

+1

It used to be the case that you needed the body, and it seems like some entertainment media still perpetuate that idea. But the rule in criminal law changed long ago. prosecutors often can build a case completely on circumstantial evidence for many kinds of crimes.

[Anonymous]

Do criminals not realize that literally every inch of society (outside of rural America) is now on camera in the year 2023? Sometimes I play a mental game of how I would get away with a crime and it's really impossible to these days with GPS in phone and vehicles and surveillance cameras on every block and in every store.

I can imagine people get especially careless if a crime is not premeditated: they snap and kill a person and then have to dispose of a body. If this guy was planing on something he should have bought the supplies 6 months ago and from several different stores (add some bleach to your grocery order, etc). He is pure evil and a moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Drop cloths. BOOM. He did it.

What’s more significant about drop cloths than a bloody knife or a mop?

What normal family owns those? I mean, the workmen bring those with them when doing their work, but they always clean up once they have completed the job.

Clearly, NORMAL families never do their own home improvement projects.

lol right? I’ve bought drop clothes to do big painting projects and while I don’t own a mop, it’s obviously a normal thing to have at home. This is definitely a totality situation but a drop cloth is not a smoking gun.

It's the timing of the purchases, as well as the fact he lied to investigators about his whereabouts when he was making them.

I own several drop cloths, but I bought them along with a few gallons of paint, a new roller cover, and some painter's tape. This was just before I took a few days off work to paint my living room, not a few days after my spouse went missing. My internet searches the day before were about whether I needed to use primer if I'm covering a lighter paint color with a darker one. And I didn't tell police officers I was getting ice cream for my kid when I was really at Home Depot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can they arrest him for murder without a body?

He already violated his parole, he can be held in custody for that alone.