Forbes top prep schools

Anonymous
Arguably, "qualified" (at least as defined by GPA and standardized test scores) functions as a threshhold test rather than something to be maximized in the admissions process at these schools.

There are an abundance of qualified kids (i.e. kids who can obviously do the work and who could benefit from this kind of education), so they choose among them on other bases. Some of those other factors involve decisions about what makes a good school (diverse student body with a mix of strengths, interests, backgrounds) and what makes an economically viable school (what keeps alumns giving, faculty loyal, the feds from taxing your endowment). And some involve placing bets on which kids are likely to end up powerful, famous, influential, or otherwise likely to sustain and enhance the school's reputation in the future.

A lot of subjectivity goes into making that last batch of decisions, but I suspect that's what's interesting and rewarding about the job for admissions officers in these positions. They're trying to sift through thousands of applications and find kids that they think look really special and promising. SAT scores and GPAs don't help much in that regard.

Again, such indicators work well as a minimum standard (and it's a minimum standard that could be quite high) and maybe a limit on the discretion of admissions officers and their subjective preferences, so they aren't useless. But college admissions at selective private schools is not (and probably shouldn't be) a best numbers wins scenario.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Some legacy are let in with scores that wouldn't get them in if they weren't legacies.


And let's not forget that if Mommy and Daddy went to Princeton, sure, their kid will be a legacy applicant if he chooses to apply to Princeton, but HE ALSO WILL PROBABLY BE PRETTY DAMN SMART ANYWAY and could probably get in on his own.

Based on what?
The assumption that if Mommy and Daddy never attended Princeton, you will PROBABLY NOT BE PRETTY DARN SMART ANYWAY???


You need to take a basic course in logic.
Anonymous
Funny -- triple and quadruple negatives don't make a positive
Anonymous
SAM2 wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Some legacy are let in with scores that wouldn't get them in if they weren't legacies.

And let's not forget that if Mommy and Daddy went to Princeton, sure, their kid will be a legacy applicant if he chooses to apply to Princeton, but HE ALSO WILL PROBABLY BE PRETTY DAMN SMART ANYWAY and could probably get in on his own.

I think this point is true, and people often forget it. For whatever reason (genetics, SES, interest in education, nature/nurture, etc), children of well-educated parents score higher on academic measures than others. When people think of legacy admissions to colleges, they most often think of the offensive example where a marginally qualified (or even completely unqualified) student gets admitted through legacy preference and huge donations. .


Wow, what discrimination, and everyone thinks it is OK
Have you ever lived? I know children of highly educated parents who do not care what their kid does in school. They have reached that level of society, so they do not need the social advantage of a brand name college for their kid.

Brand name college is important for the poorer people, for whom the only way to improve themselves is through education.
Anonymous
You obviously didn't attend a "brand name college" pp -- you don't seem to speak English properly.
Anonymous
I hope all of you end up at the same cocktail party and recognize one another. And then realize there are no mirrors nor exits--
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
SAM2 wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Some legacy are let in with scores that wouldn't get them in if they weren't legacies.

And let's not forget that if Mommy and Daddy went to Princeton, sure, their kid will be a legacy applicant if he chooses to apply to Princeton, but HE ALSO WILL PROBABLY BE PRETTY DAMN SMART ANYWAY and could probably get in on his own.

I think this point is true, and people often forget it. For whatever reason (genetics, SES, interest in education, nature/nurture, etc), children of well-educated parents score higher on academic measures than others. When people think of legacy admissions to colleges, they most often think of the offensive example where a marginally qualified (or even completely unqualified) student gets admitted through legacy preference and huge donations. .


Wow, what discrimination, and everyone thinks it is OK
Have you ever lived? I know children of highly educated parents who do not care what their kid does in school. They have reached that level of society, so they do not need the social advantage of a brand name college for their kid.

Brand name college is important for the poorer people, for whom the only way to improve themselves is through education.



You sound like the proud parent of a dum kid. Nanny, stop looking at life through the lens of your employer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I hope all of you end up at the same cocktail party and recognize one another. And then realize there are no mirrors nor exits--


I like this image!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote: ...

Wow, what discrimination, and everyone thinks it is OK
Have you ever lived? I know children of highly educated parents who do not care what their kid does in school. They have reached that level of society, so they do not need the social advantage of a brand name college for their kid.

Brand name college is important for the poorer people, for whom the only way to improve themselves is through education.


I'll try to stay out of the side discussion going on here and make the following comment:

This may be true if the family is so privileged that the kid will be able to make his/or her way in any field, just by relying on family money and/or connections. Think the kids of famous actors, british nobility and the like. Nobody ever cared whether Princess Di went to college. But if your kid will have to earn his or her own living, a "prestige" education might open the necessary doors.
Anonymous
Academic excellence should be a goal for anyone who is going to have to have to earn a living. A big-name university certainly helps.
Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools
Go to: