Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Virtual learning with a sick teacher is a better alternative? Really? They should be resting. |
Certainly not. What would the difference between red and yellow be then? |
This makes no sense. Most parents don’t want the school year extended by 2 weeks. Also, only a few schools are affected at the moment. They can’t just shut down 9 schools and extend the school year for them. Why are you saying moronic things. |
if the numbers are high enough they turn red, then go virtual. |
Well, that is a fair point. Except that a large number of kids sick in a neighborhood does indicate some level of local community transmission, I suppose. |
| Has MCPS actually shared the yellow list? |
|
I'm trying to get clear on the rationale here.
Is it due to staff shortages? If so, I get it. Is it an effort to slow the spread? If so, I don't get it. |
Because the yellow schools are all on the cusp of turning red, and there’s a lot more of those. And there are tons of staffing shortages even at yellow/green schools. Just not enough staff to safely open most of these. That’s why parking lots aren’t being plowed, to have an excuse to close again tomorrow due to “weather” and not Covid. |
| They should have just all gone virtual for two weeks and let the surge pass, staff get healthy, and return to "normal." |
Ok but I’d prefer it “work it’s way through” with the idiots who won’t take precautions or vaccinate. I’m tired of always being careful and then having no option but to send my kids to school with kids whose parents aren’t being careful. I’m tired of hearing people say we need to just accept this. I’ve done virtual funerals for family members (front line workers) who died from Covid and I have a close family member who never recovered a year after getting Covid the one time she had to leave lockdown. Letting this “run through” will overwhelm hospitals. It may also allow more mutations. Hogan is not exactly a good guy - he’s not going to close certain businesses but it doesn’t mean MCPS can’t do the right thing and close for 2 weeks to protect kids and teachers. Just because salons and restaurants are open doesn’t mean we have to go in. |
That’s ridiculous. Why shut down the whole system against prior assurances, needlessly punishing all 157,000 students? I might be Ok with it if they said 2 weeks and then ending quarantining of students until/unless they test positive, and a real assurance that no schools would ever close again. But in reality, we’d find ourselves in exactly the same place 2 weeks from now. If staffing really becomes a problem, they should simply close for a week and add those days back with the makeup days in the calendar. 2 weeks would be too long to do that, but 5 days could be done fairly easily. |
And staff. Teacher/staff positives are a huge reason for the switch to virtual. This only works if the teachers and families work to protect themselves during the closure. Many families will not have the luxury of keeping everyone home, and others won't think it is necessary. |
Doesn’t matter how you choose to close, they are all making their way to closing. Wait until school testing numbers return in the next two weeks, it will be almost everyone at this rate. |
Your post would make a lot more sense if it wasn’t for the fact that we can’t actually stop the spread of covid. All we can do is slightly slow it down, but it will still hit everyone that isn’t continuing to go to extreme measures to isolate themselves. Reducing the rate of transmissions could help hospitals, but only if they're successful at reducing transmissions to the elderly, unvaccinated, and medically frail. Stopping low-risk kids from going to school, while keeping all adult-oriented activities and facilities "business as usual" isn't going to do that. |
Perhaps parents will wise up that opting-in to testing only hurts the kids in the school. Or perhaps the next week of incredibly high covid numbers will drive people to accept the reality that covid is neither avoidable nor terrifying. |