DCSC and now mclean fleeing NCSL?

[Anonymous]

First, most DCSC top teams, and now McLean teams are showing up in EDP scheduling brackets for the first time ever. Is NCSL done?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First, most DCSC top teams, and now McLean teams are showing up in EDP scheduling brackets for the first time ever. Is NCSL done?

https://system.gotsport.com/org_event/events/27462/clubs/4341


Maybe they are dual rostering? Other clubs have done this playing their kids up a year in EDP.

[Anonymous]

This is a horrible post, white teams do NCSL

[Anonymous]

Other clubs need to follow this (dual rostering/playing up).

SYC does this and now McLean for the younger ages....hope the other clubs are watching.

[Anonymous]

Teams playing up is awful for the team playing their age. It's lose lose, either you beat the little kids and yay, you beat up on a bunch of little kids or you lose and then you lost to little kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Teams playing up is awful for the team playing their age. It's lose lose, either you beat the little kids and yay, you beat up on a bunch of little kids or you lose and then you lost to little kids.

Yeah, I’m not a fan, especially at younger ages. I teach my kids to play physical soccer (but clean), and that’s hard to turn on and off (and I don’t want them turning it off). But inevitably parents freak out when older kids are knocking junior off the ball. You shouldn’t have played up, then…

At older ages (11v11) it’s not as big of a deal.

[Anonymous]

Perhaps they will eventually get enough u10s wanting to play 9v9 in the spring and for a division just for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps they will eventually get enough u10s wanting to play 9v9 in the spring and for a division just for them.

Yes. Jeff Cup has this, for example.

Tons of teams are doing this. Playing up (11v11 at U12 or 9v9 at U10) gives the kids experience with what’s coming next, relieves some of the pressure of playing time with bigger rosters, and lets the coach preview some lower team players or guest players in the spring.

Also part of the reason is that the tournament experience is pretty bad now. If parents are given the choice, they would rather play an extra league season (on Sunday if their regular games are on Saturday, or the reverse), instead of playing an extra tournament for basically the same cost. They get 8-9 games instead of 3-4, with no stress about travel or using up yet another weekend.

One tournament can cost more than a league season. The only question is field availability, but top teams should have no problem asking their club for 4-5 extra home game fields in a season.

[Anonymous]

NCSL schedules and divisions should be released next week... I am sure they are fine as a league. Almost 100 clubs with 15-30 teams each are paid members.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Other clubs need to follow this (dual rostering/playing up).

SYC does this and now McLean for the younger ages....hope the other clubs are watching.

These clubs are just now doing this

[Anonymous]

DCSC just announced they are joining ECNL Regional League for the 2024-2025 Season

https://www.dcsoccerclub.org/news_article/show/1301620

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCSC just announced they are joining ECNL Regional League for the 2024-2025 Season

https://www.dcsoccerclub.org/news_article/show/1301620

For both genders? There are a couple strong teams in the boys program. Girls over 11 not so much

[Anonymous]

NCSL club rep. They said they have the most teams in NCSL that they have ever had at the meeting last week. About 1300 as I recall- they gave a number. This did not include the SFL (fka SFL I guess) teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps they will eventually get enough u10s wanting to play 9v9 in the spring and for a division just for them.

Yes. Jeff Cup has this, for example.

Tons of teams are doing this. Playing up (11v11 at U12 or 9v9 at U10) gives the kids experience with what’s coming next, relieves some of the pressure of playing time with bigger rosters, and lets the coach preview some lower team players or guest players in the spring.

Also part of the reason is that the tournament experience is pretty bad now. If parents are given the choice, they would rather play an extra league season (on Sunday if their regular games are on Saturday, or the reverse), instead of playing an extra tournament for basically the same cost. They get 8-9 games instead of 3-4, with no stress about travel or using up yet another weekend.

One tournament can cost more than a league season. The only question is field availability, but top teams should have no problem asking their club for 4-5 extra home game fields in a season.

If a club has multiple teams do this, that is a LOT Of extra game field space. Game fields are scheduled 8 am-8 pm Sat and Sun for almost all clubs. When SFL had all the rainouts in the fall, multiple orgs simply refused to reschedule the rained out rec games, saying they had no field space. You can't magic up extra field space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NCSL club rep. They said they have the most teams in NCSL that they have ever had at the meeting last week. About 1300 as I recall- they gave a number. This did not include the SFL (fka SFL I guess) teams.

They need to stop adding obscure clubs in far flung locations. No one wants to drive two hours. Its national CAPITAL region, not West Va or Fredericksburg.