Please share! MAGA who FAFO

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of these farmers are republicans

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/jun/18/washington-cherry-growers-struggle-to-find-pickers/

The rest of MAGA won't care. They don't eat fruit.

Sure they do. Iceberg lettuce, pale red tomatoes and waxy cucumbers with ranch, French, or 1000 island dressing; sold room temperature.

I will never understand the impulse to post things like this. You think this helps somehow?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of these farmers are republicans

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/jun/18/washington-cherry-growers-struggle-to-find-pickers/

The rest of MAGA won't care. They don't eat fruit.

That’s right, only liberals eat strawberries.

I'm sure Melania and Ivanka feed their kids the cheaper pesticides infused strawberries from Mexico.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/

This is your position?

The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?

[Anonymous]

The perspective of a white construction worker…

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKbKeVLRq2H/?igsh=ZnlyZmc5YXg3cmpl

[Anonymous]

Did anyone post the article about the CFPB case about the subprime auto lender?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/

This is your position?

The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?

Taxpayers are paying farmers not to grow soybeans.

[Anonymous]

One of the most delicious FAFOs…Arab Americans for Trump.

“We support President Trump because he promised to end war in the Middle East and Ukraine” LOL

[twitter]https://bsky.app/profile/lucagalletti.bsky.social/post/3lrvyoar3xk2p[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/

This is your position?

The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?

Taxpayers are paying farmers not to grow soybeans.

Why is that OK either?

Your only answer is to cite wrong with another wrong? WTAF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the most delicious FAFOs…Arab Americans for Trump.

“We support President Trump because he promised to end war in the Middle East and Ukraine” LOL

[twitter]https://bsky.app/profile/lucagalletti.bsky.social/post/3lrvyoar3xk2p[/twitter]

The only reason these Arab-Americans voted for Trump is because they're so socially conservative and misogynist as a group, that they could not bring themselves to believe any woman has the capabilities for the top job.

The rest of the Arab and/or Muslim community does not forget Trump's Muslim ban, which he has reinstated now, in ways that are much more difficult to fight in court.

But these people? They disgust me. Blinded by their disrespect for women. Gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/

This is your position?

The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?

Taxpayers are paying farmers not to grow soybeans.

Why is that OK either?

Your only answer is to cite wrong with another wrong? WTAF?

NP- I think that this person is saying that there's a lot to unravel in where all our tax money goes. So their examples of farmer subsidies belongs here because farmers voted against their own interest, but a lot of people who did not like seeing USAID cuts, for example, (or NIH for that matter) may be pleased that there's more light being shed on these grants if there actually is waste, abuse, or in the case of farmers, probably lots of lobbyists and senators in cahoots for their home states at the expense of the taxpayers.

And we can't just post one-liners and say 'seee'? There's good reasons we want to grow food in our country and support our farmers. Blue states can't live without that. But somehow blue states are subsidizing it without a lot of say (taxation without representation), and it could be done in a better manner than everyone getting their slice while we foot the bill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/

This is your position?

The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?

MAGA can’t read. He’s hiring a legal immigrant from another country after proving he can’t find an American to do the work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/

This is your position?

The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?

Taxpayers are paying farmers not to grow soybeans.

Why is that OK either?

Your only answer is to cite wrong with another wrong? WTAF?

NP- I think that this person is saying that there's a lot to unravel in where all our tax money goes. So their examples of farmer subsidies belongs here because farmers voted against their own interest, but a lot of people who did not like seeing USAID cuts, for example, (or NIH for that matter) may be pleased that there's more light being shed on these grants if there actually is waste, abuse, or in the case of farmers, probably lots of lobbyists and senators in cahoots for their home states at the expense of the taxpayers.

And we can't just post one-liners and say 'seee'? There's good reasons we want to grow food in our country and support our farmers. Blue states can't live without that. But somehow blue states are subsidizing it without a lot of say (taxation without representation), and it could be done in a better manner than everyone getting their slice while we foot the bill.

CA farms produce 70% of this country's produce. The red states farm products that are mostly exported or used in prepackaged foods, like soybeans. A PP is correct, taxpayers subsidize soybean farmers, some in the form of USAID subsidies.

So, yes, soybean farmers, in particular those who voted for Trump again, even after experiencing the hurt from Trump's tariffs during his first term, are FAFO. Really, they are just plain dumb.

[Anonymous]

Texas farms shutting down, crops not able to be tended to, livestock not able to be tended to, because of a lack of labor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Texas farms shutting down, crops not able to be tended to, livestock not able to be tended to, because of a lack of labor.

Womp womp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My massage therapist voted for Trump because of low taxes, I went there the other day and the place was practically empty on a Sunday ( which has NEVER happened before). She said people are cutting back and she has no customers, I thought to myself that well this takes care of the income tax problem, no income so no tax.

I can’t believe the stupidity of small businesses and non fed people, they didn’t bother to think that if their clients lose jobs then they lose business, but here we are. I have a couple of relatives in Baltimore who voted for Trump and their business sales are in the dump. I have zero sympathy.

Btw, I am not a Fed but I have 2 brain cells to figure out that pretty much everything in DC is tied to the Federal government.

You seem to be suggesting that people in America should vote for what's best for the people in the DC metro area? Why would someone in Illinois vote so that DC area workers are employed by the government?

What a dumba$$, thinking that Feds only exist in DC.

The point of voting is to choose the candidate who will do the most good for the greatest number of U.S. citizens and, because of America's status, for the greatest number of people outside its borders. Only selfish, stupid people vote only on behalf of their individual self-interests. A case in point: doesn't matter how much money you have in your bank account if you literally can't breathe which may very well be the case now that so many EPA protections are no longer in place.