Wootton bomb threat.

Anonymous
I guess kids are at it again. There goes the neighborhood! W

https://x.com/mcpnews/status/1729137073603674352?s=46&t=R3AX3c486LFdeZpFtkN_eA
Anonymous
Thankfully, all clear.
Anonymous
It’s too cold for pranks
Anonymous
We desperately need another anti-racism audit.
Anonymous
You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."


He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."


He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.
Ooooooo. He's not going to like pretending to apologize in that restorative justice circle one bit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."


He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.


I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."


He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.


I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?


MCPS is responsible for student discipline and he was supposedly disciplined in accordance to this level of violation in the student Code of Conduct. What that punishment was, we won't know because FERPA.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."


He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.


I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?


Yes the school probably won’t even remove him. My DC was a victim of harassment and was told you should look for a new school. Public education is a right. I kid you not
Anonymous
They will probably celebrate the person who called in the threat at Wootton. All the other threats were at east county schools. So this was an act of education justice.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They will probably celebrate the person who called in the threat at Wootton. All the other threats were at east county schools. So this was an act of education justice.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."


He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.


I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?


MCPS is responsible for student discipline and he was supposedly disciplined in accordance to this level of violation in the student Code of Conduct. What that punishment was, we won't know because FERPA.

Did they commit this act on school grounds even? Don't we have real laws that govern this? MCPS isn't equipped to be doling out justice. Seriously, what if a kid committed a capital crime would they just ask MCPS to dole out punishment? This is nuts especially since it likely didn't even happen at school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You would think these dumb kids would get a new playbook. This hasn't ended well for the other dummies who've pulled this exact same stunt this school year.
What? The 12 yr old who called in the previous bomb threats will no be punished because he's "too young."


He's not in jail or charged, but there were MCPS-imposed consequences, supposedly.


I didn't realize MCPS had its legal system. I thought they were a school system. Isn't this more of a decision for state/county authorities?


Yes the school probably won’t even remove him. My DC was a victim of harassment and was told you should look for a new school. Public education is a right. I kid you not


Same. We did because two ER visits are enough
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: