FCPS Boundary Review - New Maps

[Anonymous]

I would hope so if they are showing to BRAC but sounds like they may not make public to October?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would hope so if they are showing to BRAC but sounds like they may not make public to October?

I believe there are two BRAC meetings this month. The first one covers transportation and then the second meeting is a preview of the new maps.

[Anonymous]

If the maps are really going to change based on all the community feedback, will transportation be based on those old maps? The timing and process and lag time between steps is crazy on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the maps are really going to change based on all the community feedback, will transportation be based on those old maps? The timing and process and lag time between steps is crazy on this.

Who knows. It’s all been ass-backwards from the beginning. Why should anything change now?

Reid is totally incompetent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just looked at the pie charts from BRAC presentation about the priorities of each region.

It seems to me that they are meaningless. Just busywork.

https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/media/pdf/SY2025-26SchoolRegions.pdf

One thing that is clear: Keeping neighborhoods together is a priority.

Nah, keeping the demographics the same is the priority for families. Don't lie.

NP.

Ah look everyone, it’s the poster “Nah,” who is one of our hyper-partisan, social-justice warriors.

She always uses “nah.” She is completely incapable of viewing any FCPS issue through any lens, other than her extremist DEI lens.

Her responses are predictable. She rabidly defended the ultimate DEI-takeover known as the VMPI (which sought to eliminate higher math because: equity! that’s why!!).

She also supports FCPS continuing to waste millions on Nardos King’s 50+ full-time person DEI department, and also supports losing millions in federal aid dollars for poor students, just so FCPS can continue to violate students’ civil rights protected under Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

She frequently responds with insults when confronted with facts, or just posts: “lies! ITS ALL LIES, I TELL YOU!!”

You can always spot her ridiculous responses here in the FCPS forum. She is a total nutter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just looked at the pie charts from BRAC presentation about the priorities of each region.

It seems to me that they are meaningless. Just busywork.

https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/media/pdf/SY2025-26SchoolRegions.pdf

One thing that is clear: Keeping neighborhoods together is a priority.

Nah, keeping the demographics the same is the priority for families. Don't lie.

NP.

Ah look everyone, it’s the poster “Nah,” who is one of our hyper-partisan, social-justice warriors.

She always uses “nah.” She is completely incapable of viewing any FCPS issue through any lens, other than her extremist DEI lens.

Her responses are predictable. She rabidly defended the ultimate DEI-takeover known as the VMPI (which sought to eliminate higher math because: equity! that’s why!!).

She also supports FCPS continuing to waste millions on Nardos King’s 50+ full-time person DEI department, and also supports losing millions in federal aid dollars for poor students, just so FCPS can continue to violate students’ civil rights protected under Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

She frequently responds with insults when confronted with facts, or just posts: “lies! ITS ALL LIES, I TELL YOU!!”

You can always spot her ridiculous responses here in the FCPS forum. She is a total nutter.

Is she the one who throws in astericks with the letter f? I've been the brunt of that.

And, I guess I was raised differently. But, I was taught to be considerate of others and using others of lying is not considerate--especially if what you are posting is also an opinion.
It reminds me a little bit of those who defend Overton on the Hayfield football issue. But, I don't think it is the same person. That issue is a little different. I think the "nah" person is a SJW who either works for FCPS or is on BRAC.....I'm thinking of a different person than the one we usually blame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would hope so if they are showing to BRAC but sounds like they may not make public to October?

I believe there are two BRAC meetings this month. The first one covers transportation and then the second meeting is a preview of the new maps.

summary on BRAC meeting from yesterday

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would hope so if they are showing to BRAC but sounds like they may not make public to October?

I believe there are two BRAC meetings this month. The first one covers transportation and then the second meeting is a preview of the new maps.

summary on BRAC meeting from yesterday

Where? It's not on the BRAC website.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would hope so if they are showing to BRAC but sounds like they may not make public to October?

I believe there are two BRAC meetings this month. The first one covers transportation and then the second meeting is a preview of the new maps.

summary on BRAC meeting from yesterday

Where? It's not on the BRAC website.

The slides for the August meeting indicate the next meeting is tonight, not yesterday night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would hope so if they are showing to BRAC but sounds like they may not make public to October?

I believe there are two BRAC meetings this month. The first one covers transportation and then the second meeting is a preview of the new maps.

summary on BRAC meeting from yesterday

Where? It's not on the BRAC website.

The slides for the August meeting indicate the next meeting is tonight, not yesterday night.

When are the slides released?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would hope so if they are showing to BRAC but sounds like they may not make public to October?

I believe there are two BRAC meetings this month. The first one covers transportation and then the second meeting is a preview of the new maps.

summary on BRAC meeting from yesterday

Where? It's not on the BRAC website.

The slides for the August meeting indicate the next meeting is tonight, not yesterday night.

When are the slides released?

Earliest so far has been close of business on the day after the BRAC meeting. I think it’s been a day or two later a few times.

[Anonymous]

When will they release the BRAC priorities given last time by each region?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When will they release the BRAC priorities given last time by each region?

I don’t think they’ve agreed to do that, so don’t hold your breath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When will they release the BRAC priorities given last time by each region?

I don’t think they’ve agreed to do that, so don’t hold your breath.

It should be released

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When will they release the BRAC priorities given last time by each region?

I don’t think they’ve agreed to do that, so don’t hold your breath.

It should be released

They ought to be, and perhaps they will be, but I don’t think FCPS has committed to post the BRAC priorities.

The materials they have been posting have been the slide decks provided to the BRAC, not all the feedback provided by the BRAC.