EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.


It would be fascinating if both spilled everything they have on each other. Not sure why he’s holding back at this point. What has his restraint gotten him?


A lot of it is out there, people just choose to ignore it I guess. It’s well known that he had a raging alcohol problem for years and she also was addicted to drugs for many years. They had an open relationship since about 2009.

For some reason, everybody wants to believe they were this amazing couple until all of a sudden Monday in 2016 it all exploded.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


He has many fans, far more than Jolie.


"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.



What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.


What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him


Angelina's "fans" are bonkers for supporting a parent who alienated the kids against the other parent. No emotionally and mentally healthy person thinks that is in the best interest of the children and applauding this is gross.


You're just side stepping the "fans" attacking the kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


He has many fans, far more than Jolie.


"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.



What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.


What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him


Angelina's "fans" are bonkers for supporting a parent who alienated the kids against the other parent. No emotionally and mentally healthy person thinks that is in the best interest of the children and applauding this is gross.


You're just side stepping the "fans" attacking the kids.


What should I do? Send them to timeout? Regardless that doesn't change that Angelina doesn't seem to be doing the right thing by the kids, half of whom are adults anyway and those seem to be the ones being discussed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.


Because she hasn’t fabricated the details yet. And revealing all would defeat the purpose of her allegations. She wants to make vague allegations and insinuate there is more to the story in order to have her allegations hanging over his head and have everyone guessing over what terrible “abuse” she suffered.



She knows full well she'll be the next Amber Heard if she comes forward with a mix of truth, embellishments, and lies. Agree the insinuations are far more helpful to her. Everyone knows he was a full-on drunk since sometime before their marriage and during it. Everyone also knows they had toxic fights. She herself said he was abusive to the kids *once.* So, what else is there? I believe he has plenty of embarrassing info on her, including affairs, drug use, and, especially, mental health problems. But his kids would never forgive him if he dragged her publicly. I think he still thinks there's a chance of reconnecting at some point, and doesn't want to permanently destroy that chance. She has him over a barrel where they're concerned, but, as I read somewhere recently, he won Hollywood in the divorce. I'm sure that stings for her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


He has many fans, far more than Jolie.


"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.



What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.


What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him


Angelina's "fans" are bonkers for supporting a parent who alienated the kids against the other parent. No emotionally and mentally healthy person thinks that is in the best interest of the children and applauding this is gross.


You're just side stepping the "fans" attacking the kids.


What should I do? Send them to timeout? Regardless that doesn't change that Angelina doesn't seem to be doing the right thing by the kids, half of whom are adults anyway and those seem to be the ones being discussed.



+1 Any posts attacking the kids (and there aren't many) are being ignored.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


He has many fans, far more than Jolie.


"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.


No. Jolie filed for the legal name change in retaliation for Brad winning his recent motion in court. It’s a perfect example of her vindictiveness.


This is just delusional. Shiloh filed it because she turned 18. She hasn't used his name in years.



The timing with her NDA loss in the winery lawsuit is purely coincidental? And that exact pattern recurring over the years, also coincidental?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


It seems like one person has made the last two pages worth of posts..
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


He has many fans, far more than Jolie.


"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.



What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.


What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him


Angelina's "fans" are bonkers for supporting a parent who alienated the kids against the other parent. No emotionally and mentally healthy person thinks that is in the best interest of the children and applauding this is gross.


You're just side stepping the "fans" attacking the kids.


What should I do? Send them to timeout? Regardless that doesn't change that Angelina doesn't seem to be doing the right thing by the kids, half of whom are adults anyway and those seem to be the ones being discussed.


No one has to do anything. Don't be blind and pretend those "fans" care anything about them. I don't care if they're adults. They're only being talked down because they're lying for Pitt.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


It seems like one person has made the last two pages worth of posts..


Definitely 😂They keep saying the same thing so its easy to tell. Angelina has no friends. Angelina has no man. Angelina has no career. The kids are feral and freaks. The kids are uneducated. I am not surprised they didn't take this well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


He has many fans, far more than Jolie.


"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.


No. Jolie filed for the legal name change in retaliation for Brad winning his recent motion in court. It’s a perfect example of her vindictiveness.


This is just delusional. Shiloh filed it because she turned 18. She hasn't used his name in years.



The timing with her NDA loss in the winery lawsuit is purely coincidental? And that exact pattern recurring over the years, also coincidental?


Again shiloh hasn't used his name in years. Her 18th birthday was Monday and she wanted to sign the papers asap. Was she supposed to wait to satisfy your schedule
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


It seems like one person has made the last two pages worth of posts..


Definitely 😂They keep saying the same thing so its easy to tell. Angelina has no friends. Angelina has no man. Angelina has no career. The kids are feral and freaks. The kids are uneducated. I am not surprised they didn't take this well.



Stop sock-puppeting. There are many on this thread who believe Pitt was a crap partner and parent while alcoholic but who hasn't done anything since rehab to deserve alienation from his kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.


Because she hasn’t fabricated the details yet. And revealing all would defeat the purpose of her allegations. She wants to make vague allegations and insinuate there is more to the story in order to have her allegations hanging over his head and have everyone guessing over what terrible “abuse” she suffered.



She knows full well she'll be the next Amber Heard if she comes forward with a mix of truth, embellishments, and lies. Agree the insinuations are far more helpful to her. Everyone knows he was a full-on drunk since sometime before their marriage and during it. Everyone also knows they had toxic fights. She herself said he was abusive to the kids *once.* So, what else is there? I believe he has plenty of embarrassing info on her, including affairs, drug use, and, especially, mental health problems. But his kids would never forgive him if he dragged her publicly. I think he still thinks there's a chance of reconnecting at some point, and doesn't want to permanently destroy that chance. She has him over a barrel where they're concerned, but, as I read somewhere recently, he won Hollywood in the divorce. I'm sure that stings for her.


He will never reconcile with the children as long as they are under Jolie’s influence. His only chance of reconciling with them is when they build their own lives as adults separately from Jolie.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.


Because she hasn’t fabricated the details yet. And revealing all would defeat the purpose of her allegations. She wants to make vague allegations and insinuate there is more to the story in order to have her allegations hanging over his head and have everyone guessing over what terrible “abuse” she suffered.



She knows full well she'll be the next Amber Heard if she comes forward with a mix of truth, embellishments, and lies. Agree the insinuations are far more helpful to her. Everyone knows he was a full-on drunk since sometime before their marriage and during it. Everyone also knows they had toxic fights. She herself said he was abusive to the kids *once.* So, what else is there? I believe he has plenty of embarrassing info on her, including affairs, drug use, and, especially, mental health problems. But his kids would never forgive him if he dragged her publicly. I think he still thinks there's a chance of reconnecting at some point, and doesn't want to permanently destroy that chance. She has him over a barrel where they're concerned, but, as I read somewhere recently, he won Hollywood in the divorce. I'm sure that stings for her.


He will never reconcile with the children as long as they are under Jolie’s influence. His only chance of reconciling with them is when they build their own lives as adults separately from Jolie.



The two older boys don't seem to be at all independent, and two of the girls seem completely enmeshed with Jolie as well. The only one who might develop her own perspective outside of her family unit bubble is the one in college. But the older ones well remember his alcoholism and absenteeism prior to the split. They've also lived with their mom's perpetual victim status for many years now, so probably don't care that he's made genuine efforts since he got sober.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change


It seems like one person has made the last two pages worth of posts..


Definitely 😂They keep saying the same thing so its easy to tell. Angelina has no friends. Angelina has no man. Angelina has no career. The kids are feral and freaks. The kids are uneducated. I am not surprised they didn't take this well.



Stop sock-puppeting. There are many on this thread who believe Pitt was a crap partner and parent while alcoholic but who hasn't done anything since rehab to deserve alienation from his kids.


Uh huh. he’s been using her name for years to imply that he isn’t abusive or a deadbeat dad. That right there would be enough for me to change my name.
Anonymous
I'd be shocked if any of her children were emotionally healthy.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: