EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

No. Jolie filed for the legal name change in retaliation for Brad winning his recent motion in court. It’s a perfect example of her vindictiveness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

No. Jolie filed for the legal name change in retaliation for Brad winning his recent motion in court. It’s a perfect example of her vindictiveness.

This is just delusional. Shiloh filed it because she turned 18. She hasn't used his name in years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

Standing up from what exactly? An isolated incident of abuse from 8 years ago, by an alcoholic parent who’s since recovered?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him

They’ve been deliberately and systematically alienated from him. They are pawns in her toxic game. Name one thing he did since the plane incident to deserve this. Spending millions to try to secure shared custody?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him

They’ve been deliberately and systematically alienated from him. They are pawns in her toxic game. Name one thing he did since the plane incident to deserve this. Spending millions to try to secure shared custody?

Then once again why are "fans" attacking the kids? All BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him

They’ve been deliberately and systematically alienated from him. They are pawns in her toxic game. Name one thing he did since the plane incident to deserve this. Spending millions to try to secure shared custody?

Then once again why are "fans" attacking the kids? All BS.

Don’t see anyone attacking the kids, only mom. There is one money-fixated poster no one agrees with, and that’s it. Most of us think the kids are being terribly harmed by this and feel sorry that they live in such a sad mom-controlled bubble.

[Anonymous]

Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.

It would be fascinating if both spilled everything they have on each other. Not sure why he’s holding back at this point. What has his restraint gotten him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him

They’ve been deliberately and systematically alienated from him. They are pawns in her toxic game. Name one thing he did since the plane incident to deserve this. Spending millions to try to secure shared custody?

Then once again why are "fans" attacking the kids? All BS.

Don’t see anyone attacking the kids, only mom. There is one money-fixated poster no one agrees with, and that’s it. Most of us think the kids are being terribly harmed by this and feel sorry that they live in such a sad mom-controlled bubble.

You're joking right? Cut the BS. This just one of the many comments attacking the kids.

"Jolie’s kids are a mess. Don’t forget: Shiloh went by John for years and still looks uncomfortable and likely medicated in photos."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him

They’ve been deliberately and systematically alienated from him. They are pawns in her toxic game. Name one thing he did since the plane incident to deserve this. Spending millions to try to secure shared custody?

Then once again why are "fans" attacking the kids? All BS.

Don’t see anyone attacking the kids, only mom. There is one money-fixated poster no one agrees with, and that’s it. Most of us think the kids are being terribly harmed by this and feel sorry that they live in such a sad mom-controlled bubble.

You're joking right? Cut the BS. This just one of the many comments attacking the kids.

"Jolie’s kids are a mess. Don’t forget: Shiloh went by John for years and still looks uncomfortable and likely medicated in photos."

Don’t see anyone agreeing with this dumb post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.

Because she hasn’t fabricated the details yet. And revealing all would defeat the purpose of her allegations. She wants to make vague allegations and insinuate there is more to the story in order to have her allegations hanging over his head and have everyone guessing over what terrible “abuse” she suffered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol I see the Pitt fan is losing it over shilohs name change

He has many fans, far more than Jolie.

"Fans" wouldn't be attacking his kids and having a meltdown just because they're standing up for themselves and each other.

What type of "fans" would support a mother using her kids as pawns in her never-ending divorce saga? It's borderline child abuse.

What does have to do with "fans" attacking the kids? They aren't Angelina and by your scenario victims. All BS. The "fans" are just mad they're standing up for themselves as I said and will not pretend everything is fine with him

Angelina's "fans" are bonkers for supporting a parent who alienated the kids against the other parent. No emotionally and mentally healthy person thinks that is in the best interest of the children and applauding this is gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since she made it clear she wouldn’t sign an NDA tyen why doesn’t she do a sit down interview and spill every detail of his purported abuse? I’d listen, if there is anything real to discuss there.

It would be fascinating if both spilled everything they have on each other. Not sure why he’s holding back at this point. What has his restraint gotten him?

He comes out looking sane and looking out for the kids in the long run, sacrificing some blows to his reputation, as any decent parent would. The majority of the public can see who is likely right and who is wrong which is why his career and reputation are still in tact and hers? Eh....