The worlds first “AI” (artificial intelligence) celebrity model, social media influencer

[Anonymous]

This “woman” is stunning. Milla it’s the first artificial celebrity. Literally perfect. However, she is not real. She has hundreds of thousands of followers. Do you think this trend will continue? Will there be fewer human movie stars and actors down the road?

Read more here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12336293/Stunning-blonde-19-100-000-social-media-followers-taking-internet-storm-scantily-clad-portraits-tell-whats-wrong-photos.html

[Anonymous]

You lost me at "first artificial celebrity".

[Anonymous]

35k followers on Instagram is nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You lost me at "first artificial celebrity".

“ artificial intelligence” created this person. “AI” means artificial intelligence. To simplify it, this woman is 100% computer generated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:35k followers on Instagram is nothing.

Does that mean you don’t think that we will see more of this in the future? Ultimately Actor is being replaced?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:35k followers on Instagram is nothing.

Does that mean you don’t think that we will see more of this in the future? Ultimately Actor is being replaced?

*actors being replaced…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:35k followers on Instagram is nothing.

did you even read the article?
“A stunning blonde, 19, with over 100,000 social media followers”

[Anonymous]

I could see this technology being used to help actors. For example, instead of using stand-ins, they can use artificial intelligence beings.

Supermodels good have AI doppelgängers that they use to save their time obviously they would insist on being be paid.

So many things really

[Anonymous]

How many people follow Donald Duck or Wolverine?

[Anonymous]

We are likely a generation away from AI actors, I’m sure they will fall in uncanny valley

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:35k followers on Instagram is nothing.

did you even read the article?
“A stunning blonde, 19, with over 100,000 social media followers”

Why would they give her an age, “19”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many people follow Donald Duck or Wolverine?

Yes, but this looks like an actual human being and a supermodel at that. She possesses every perfect human feature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:35k followers on Instagram is nothing.

did you even read the article?
“A stunning blonde, 19, with over 100,000 social media followers”

Sure did, then went to specific platforms to see what the numbers were. 35k on Instagram, 10k on twitter etc. If total reach was over a million, maybe I’d be impressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:35k followers on Instagram is nothing.

did you even read the article?
“A stunning blonde, 19, with over 100,000 social media followers”

Why would they give her an age, “19”?

I think initially they wanted people to think she was actually a human.

[Anonymous]

This doesn’t surprise me at all given how lacking in real substance most social media is—it would be pretty easy to AI a vapid influencer or a knee-jerk a-hole SM presence (like a joe organ).
People with actual creatively, insight and humor will not be as easily replaced. The question is whether consumers or SM value those things, or just want the vapidity.

I am constantly reminded of the talking walls in Fahrenheit 451 (the fireman’s wife was addicted to her interaction with “people” in her electronic walls — I can’t remember if it was explicitly stated but I think they were basically AI “people” that she purchased access to. She valued them over her relationship with her husband. We are basically there already.