Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
What kind of pot are you smoking that you think Israel wasn't going to retaliate against Hamas and relentlessly hunt them down and use every means available, even to the point of not letting them hide behind civilians and use them as human shields? Was it your dippy expectation that somehow Israel was going to do nothing, maybe even just capitulate to Hamas and say "ahh okay, you killed a thousand of our people, we give up, we're packing up and moving to Europe and you can have the whole country...." Talk about mental gymnastics. You seem to have some unrealistic and delusional beliefs. |
What was the legal standing of the Palestinians/Arabs? Remember, the Palestinians/Arabs weren't in charge and hadn't been for a very very long time. Remember that they had lost sovereignty and control to the Turks hundreds of years prior, and then to the Allies in WWI who captured Palestine from the Ottomans. They lacked a sovereign mandate for dictating the terms. Just because you didn't sign doesn't mean it doesn't apply to you or that you aren't beholden to it. Claiming otherwise would be like that stupid "Sovereign Citizen" crap that people try pulling. |
DP Our expectation is that they don't deliberately starve civilians. I don't think that's an unrealistic or delusional belief and I find it very odd that you pretend to think that it is. |
I see we’re now in the “making the desert bloom” part of our regular programming. How do you make peace with someone who keeps taking your land? It’s a question for finer minds than yours, I’m sure. |
Maybe you should look up the uniquely Israeli feat of legal cruelty called Present Absentees. |
Hamas could return all hostages, living or dead. Yes, they are sadistic to prolong this. |
+1 Frankly, it's more than "odd" to believe that retaliation requires the deliberate starvation of thousands of babies. It's sociopathic. |
Starving 2 million people, including 1 million children, to punish 20,000 is to you an ironic phrase, beyond the pale. |
They owned less than 7% of the land at the time Israel declared independence. They "acquired" the rest by ethnically cleansing Palestinians whose ancestors had lived there for centuries. The Zionist method of ethnic cleansing was actually genocide. They massacred, tortured, and raped to drive people out of their villages and then burned and bulldozed their homes so they couldn't return. They drove the Palestinians across borders into neighboring states and then murdered them if they tried to return home. Why would Palestinians simply accept this? Why did the rest of the world accept this? Would you expect Israelis to accept the same treatment today? |
? I don't understand your point. Hamas has the option to end this. You are reaffirming that they are sadists. Do you deny that they are holding Israeli hostages, many women, and extending this conflict? They had apparently had detente before. Why not now? |
It's not a very difficult concept. |
I am amazed by your unwillingness or inability to comprehend that the IDF and Israel had various strategic options for how to retaliate. After all, doesn't Israel have one of the most advanced armies in the world? Hamas does not dictate how Israel chooses to respond to this conflict. The tacit approval and thinly veiled encouragement of the deliberate and sadistic starvation of tens of thousands of babies and children--who are innocents in this conflict--shocks the conscience of people around the world. And we are not all antisemites. There are Israelis and Jews who also believe that the stunningly inhumane strategy taken by Israel under Netanyahu is ultimately disastrous for Israel and fueled by a crazed, racist bloodlust. Israel has become a pariah. Even its closest ally, the US, realizes this. |
Moving the goalposts. Absolutely nobody here said that it was unrealistic or delusional to think that people shouldn't be starved and it's dishonest of you to suggest that this was the premise. You completely glossed over Hamas's role, and THAT is the unrealistic and delusional part of your worldview. Who is standing in the way of the civilians getting fed? At the end of the day it's Hamas. Hamas needs to surrender or capitulate and stand down in order for the people to be safely be reached and be fed. I find it very odd that you pretend to think it's purely the IDF acting in a complete vacuum with nothing but pure genocidal malice. |
DP. All I needed was the bit above:
When you don't own the land, you don't own the land. In just about ever country in the world including the Arab world, if the building you live in changes hands, the new owners very much have the right to evict you. Not sure how or why Palestine should somehow be a unique special snowflake kind of place where the legal land owners have no rights over the lands they purchased. If that's the case then what's even the point of deeds? I will say the same should apply to Israeli settlers too. If they do not have legal ownership or a legal landlord-tenant agreement with the current landowners then they are illegal squatters and are subject to be evicted at the landowner's request. |
It's not a difficult concept to understand that Hamas could end the starvation tomorrow by capitulating and standing down. Hamas has nothing to gain by continuing its fight and is only doing more and more damage to the Palestinian people for every hour that they cling to their delusional positions. |