|
“The tone of the administration’s 27-page filing—particularly its first five pages—depart from the usual style for federal appellate briefs, which typically focus on legal arguments. Instead, the language closely resembles Trump’s charged remarks and social media posts about the ballroom, which the president has identified as a personal priority. The appeal invokes the ‘American Patriots’ who have made donations for the project, lists various materials being used to construct it and repeats Trump’s frequent boasts that the project is under budget and ahead of schedule.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/04/trump-ballroom-appeal-emergency/ |
| That’s bribery right? Can the executives from the steel company be prosecuted for this after the current administration is gone? |
| Wait, I thought they raised 400 million of private funds for this...why do they need gifts of materials? |
|
It sounds like, based on this court filig, the "bunker" was already built
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645.69.0.pdf so whatever trump did to destroy the east wing was totally unnecessary. |
It's so maddening to read these self-serving arguments because the implication is that Trump can claim anything is important to his own or someone else's "security", undertake that thing, and never be subject to review. It's yet another claim of unfettered control by a unitary executive over the country's assets. Very kingly. |
| It's the underground stuff he really wants anyway, isn't it? |
Correct. The broligarchs are obsessed with bunkers. |
Why doesn't he just build the ballroom underground? |
| He's desperate to create a lasting legacy. Usually that's done with legislation (since executive orders can be easily reversed) but nothing that can be passed via reconciliation is good enough for His Orangeness. So he's just going to build a ballroom and dare his successor to demolish it. |