Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Her location is irrelevant because when she was at the hospital she was not offered proper medical care. Her doctors were blocked by laws pushed by religious people. Religious a-holes are 100% to blame for her big receiving proper care. Religious a-holes are also 100% responsible for this ridiculous persecution. Find a new fetish. Stop judging and persecuting women for your own pleasure. |
Newsflash: for normal people who don’t worship fetuses… A 21w stillborn fetus is no way equivalent to a living breathing woman. |
The doctors recommended a specific treatment, but were not able to provide it for 8 hours because of a committee that hadn't yet made a decision. How is that not "blocked"? That's pretty much the definition of the word blocked. When someone stops you from doing something you want to do, they are blocking you. I didn't make the original comment you claim was debunked. But blocked is an accurate description of what happened. |
She was offered medical treatment twice during two hospitalizations. Can someone show where the New York Times article states that doctors were BLOCKED from giving this woman medical treatment? I’ve read the linked article twice and don’t see the word BLOCKED anywhere. Show us the proof it’s written in the article. |
Laws forcing someone else’s religion on me are unethical and, frankly, unconstitutional. But we have religious extremists in powerful positions now so human rights will continue to be violated. And religious wackos will continue to get off on their sadistic fantasies of hurting women. |
Ohio state law requires issuance of a death certificate and the body of the baby to be buried on the family’s property, or the hospital or coroner to responsibly deal with the baby’s body, whichever the family prefers. It has nothing to do with anyone’s opinion of abortion or unborn babies, it’s public health and safety/ legal requirements . |
Ohio state law requires issuance of a death certificate and the body of the baby to be buried on the family’s property, or the hospital or coroner to responsibly deal with the baby’s body, whichever the family prefers. It has nothing to do with anyone’s opinion of abortion or unborn babies, it’s public health and safety/ legal requirements . Maybe someday you’ll be able to comprehend things exist in the real world beyond your insane political and religious rants. |
Have you found the paragraph from the NYT article that states doctors were BLOCKED from providing this woman medical treatment? Or are you going to slink away like the stinky liar you are? |
You’re being obtuse. They would have treated her immediately if they didn’t have to call the ethics board to review the situation. And they still didn’t treat her on her subsequent visit. Religious a-holes prevented this woman from getting the care she needed. And they get sick pleasure out of judging her every action and persecuting her for all of it. It’s disgusting beyond words. You people are truly vile. |
Dp- The law blocked the law blocked the doctors. The at the time meant she was denied proper care. |
🚨 THE WORD BLOCKED IS NOT PRESENT IN THE NYT ARTICLE. EL STINKO DELUXO POSTED A LIE. Quit lying, liar. THE ETHICS COMMITTEE DID NOT BLOCK DOCTORS FROM TREATING THIS WOMAN. LIARS WHO LIE ARE JUST LYING. |
🚨 BUT YOU HAVE NO SOURCE FOR YOUR POST FROM EITHER THE NYT ARTICLE OR ANY OTHER ARTICLE FROM A LEGITIMATE NEWS SOURCE, RIGHT, STINKY? |
Ok. All of that still could have happened. The law doesn’t say anything about timing. She was still in serious condition. They could have handled the “product of human conception” when she was released from the hospital. She did nothing wrong. Religious a-holes are judging and persecuting her every move because they get off on it. |
🚨SHE LEFT OF HER OWN ACCORD TWICE, STINKY. SHE REFUSED MEDICAL TREATMENT. |
Don’t bother. They can’t answer and will continue to 1) make up their own facts, 2) move the goalposts or 3) an combination of 1 & 2 Call them on their sh¡t and the hand waving and smoke and mirrors start. They can’t handle it. |