Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Call the police. |
This is DC.... what police? |
|
Let's see if Bibi complies with the UN Security Council resolution.
And what a punk move by the US. #shame |
+1. I keep thinking that the way that Israel is treating Gaza is like an abusive husband who beats his wife to a pulp because of some infraction she committed. Israel, the husband, is saying, well, this is all her fault. I wouldn't have beaten her nearly to death if only she had been better behaved. |
So sorry. We are giving money away here to recent migrants. |
How completely idiotic - that's a totally wrong analogy. Hamas has launched thousands of rockets at Israel over the last several years, which would have killed many thousands, were it not for the Iron Dome. And then Hamas launched a violent assault, massacring or kidnapping civilians right and left. When you punch someone in the face and break their nose, and then that person whose nose you broke comes back with a group of friends to break your nose in return, it's NOT EVEN REMOTELY a "she asked for it because of how she was dressed" situation. |
A ceasefire won't happen if Hamas doesn't honor it. Completely insane to demand that only one side stop. |
Except there are not "thousands of 'Christian' nations" (and not even "thousands" of nations as there are 195). Most first-world countries are secular. Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden technically have a Christian state religion, but in practice, they are about as secular as you can get. The argument that Jews have to have their own country because everyone else gets one is false. It is one of many spurious claims Zionists offer to justify their theft of Palestinian land and their ethnic cleansing and dehumanization of Palestinians. These claims include, "We're the true indigenous people," "We can only be safe if Israel exists," "Nobody lived there (it was a 'land without a people'), so we didn't hurt anyone moving in," "Palestinians are primitive, dangerous, and dirty," "God gave us the land," "We're more technologically advanced," "We're acting as a bulwark for the West against Islamic terror," and so forth. These arguments are all easily defeated, but arguing against them is like playing whack-a-mole with a climate denier. You can destroy one claim, but then your interlocutor simply slides on to the next and will eventually come full circle back to the first one and repeat the process. |
Well, isn't Israel the party that is invading Gaza and dropping bombs on innocent civilians? At this point Hamas is just defending itself. |
The irony of what you said is probably lost on you - this is exactly the scenario that cause Hamas to attack Israel. |
|
Let's hope this helps the hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza who are desperate for food, clean water, shelter, and healthcare. Good to see the international community coming together. Israel is pouting because the U.S. abstained. Perhaps this is the start of greater justice in the region. |
So , then you agree Hamas is justified then due to settler infractions and West Bank’s increasing death toll from 2020-2023? Retribution for me but not for them makes no sense |
Bibi has a choice to make. He can stop the massacre, or he can continue to show the world that Israel under his control is content to be a pariah state. |
There’s already talk about the valuable beach front real estate. The bodies aren’t even cold yet. |