The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Exoneration parade round 2. Coming to a special committee near you!

https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/25/mueller-to-testify-before-congress/

Olc said he could charge the pres but he didn’t? Why?

When did he know the president was innocent? Why did he keep soaking the taxpayers for his 400 page exoneration.

answers coming soon!

Be interesting to see if gonadler and pencilneck ask even remotely intelligent questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exoneration parade round 2. Coming to a special committee near you!

https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/25/mueller-to-testify-before-congress/

Olc said he could charge the pres but he didn’t? Why?

When did he know the president was innocent? Why did he keep soaking the taxpayers for his 400 page exoneration.

answers coming soon!

Be interesting to see if gonadler and pencilneck ask even remotely intelligent questions.

Does this make sense to you?

[Anonymous]

the WHAT report?

[Anonymous]

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318


The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318


The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.

It shouldn’t have, but it did. Those who are saying that the FBI was spying or targeting the GOP in 2016 don’t have America’s interests in mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318


The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.

Oh, look..... Steele's attorneys spoke off the record.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318


The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.

Oh, look..... Steele's attorneys spoke off the record.

lol

That's what you think is happening?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318


The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.

Oh, look..... Steele's attorneys spoke off the record.

Read the article. It specifically says that this will likely take the wind out of the sails of the Trump supporters who think the IG s going to come out with a blistering report against Mueller.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318


The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.

Oh, look..... Steele's attorneys spoke off the record.

Read the article. It specifically says that this will likely take the wind out of the sails of the Trump supporters who think the IG s going to come out with a blistering report against Mueller.

Don’t think you can convince Cult45 of anything other than the “libtards” are behind everything.

[Anonymous]

More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.

As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.

As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/ig-russia-investigation-steele.html

I forgot the link

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.

As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?

No, they’ll just pivot and hope for something, anything from the investigation by the Connecticut US Attorney.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.

As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/ig-russia-investigation-steele.html

I forgot the link

We’ll see. The nyt hasn’t been reliable for quite some time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.

As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/ig-russia-investigation-steele.html

I forgot the link

We’ll see. The nyt hasn’t been reliable for quite some time.

Here’s Politico, then:
“The interview was contentious at first ... but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible."

Some US officials interviewed said "it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly."
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318

[Anonymous]

This is how Russia is seeding the nationalist movement in Europe (and the US)

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/albertonardelli/salvini-russia-oil-deal-secret-recording

Read that then recall the Roseneft deal. Recall also, that Carter Page went to Moscow and the details of that trip were hidden from Mueller.