Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
There is zero justification for this slaughter!
20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.
NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.
1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?
2. I agree re Congressional approval.
How did 20,000 people get saved?
How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?
Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.
For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.
For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.
I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.