Middle school magnets - criteria-based

Anonymous
Copying some info that was mistakenly put in MSMC thread:

- Results should be out on the 21st
- Q&A can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CD-zDANEJAR5X-...x9sCd4JS1IGPEB1VL-0-9Y/preview
- Presuming straight As, biggest challenge for getting into the lottery pool is getting a locally normed 85th percentile MAP score. Here is the info that MCCPTA Gifted Education Committee released from their public-records request on what local normed were used for middle-school magnets last year. The actual RIT/percentile cutoffs coud be different this year, but certainly they will still vary greatly by the percent FARMs at school. Those in high-FARMs schools will need lower MAP scores to be placed in the lottery than those in low FARMs scools.

2022 criteria-based middle-school magnet lottery
Minimum MAP score/national percentile to be placed in the criteria-based magnets, by percentage of students receiving FARMs at the school:

Math/science magnets: MAP-M
FARMS %, raw MAP score, national perentile
Low FARMs, 232 RIT, 93th percentile
Low-moderate FARMs, 230 RIT, 92nd percentile
Moderate FARMs, 224 RIT, 84th percentile
Moderate-high FARMs, 215 RIT, 65th percentile
High FARMs, 213 RIT, 60th percentile

Communicaitons magnets: MAP-R
FARMS %, raw MAP score, national perentile
Low FARMs, 228 RIT, 92nd percentile
Low-moderate FARMs, 228 RIT, 92nd percentile
Moderate FARMs, 224 RIT, 88th percentile
Moderate-high FARMs, 216 RIT, 76th percentile
High FARMs, 213 RIT, 70th percentile

And here are how the ES are grouped by FARMs rate, also from the public-records request results released by MCCPTA GEC:

Low FARMS:
ASHBURTON ES
BANNOCKBURN ES
BELLS MILL ES
BELMONT ES
BETHESDA ES
BEVERLY FARMS ES
BRADLEY HILLS ES
BURNING TREE ES
CARDEROCK SPRINGS ES
CEDAR GROVE ES
COLD SPRING ES
DARNESTOWN ES
DIAMOND ES
DUFIEF ES
FALLSMEAD ES
FARMLAND ES
GARRETT PARK ES
GREENWOOD ES
KENSINGTON PARKWOOD ES
LAKEWOOD ES
MONOCACY ES
OLNEY ES
POOLESVILLE ES
POTOMAC ES
RITCHIE PARK ES
SEVEN LOCKS ES
SHERWOOD ES
SLIGO CREEK ES
Snowden Farm ES
SOMERSET ES
STONE MILL ES
TRAVILAH ES
WAYSIDE ES
WESTBROOK ES
WIMS ES
WOOD ACRES ES
WOODFIELD ES
WYNGATE ES

Low Moderate FARMS:
BARNSLEY ES
Bayard Rustin ES
BEALL ES
BROOKE GROVE ES
CANDLEWOOD ES
CARSON ES
CASHELL ES
CHEVY CHASE ES
CLARKSBURG ES
CLEARSPRING ES
CLOVERLY ES
COLLEGE GARDENS ES
DAMASCUS ES
FLOWER VALLEY ES
FOREST KNOLLS ES
GERMANTOWN ES
GIBBS ES
HIGHLAND VIEW ES
JONES LANE ES
LAYTONSVILLE ES
LITTLE BENNETT ES
LONGVIEW SCHOOL
LUXMANOR ES
MARSHALL ES
MATSUNAGA ES
MCNAIR ES
NORTH CHEVY CHASE ES
OAKLAND TERRACE ES
PAGE ES
PINEY BRANCH ES
ROCK CREEK FOREST ES
ROCK CREEK VALLEY ES
ROCKWELL ES
STEPHEN KNOLLS
STONEGATE ES
WESTOVER ES
WOODLIN ES

Moderate FARMS
BURTONSVILLE ES
DREW ES
EAST SILVER SPRING ES
FIELDS ROAD ES
FOX CHAPEL ES
GLEN HAVEN ES
GLENALLAN ES
GOSHEN ES
GREAT SENECA CREEK ES
MARYVALE ES
MCAULIFFE ES
MEADOW HALL ES
MILL CREEK TOWNE ES
PINE CREST ES
RESNIK ES
RIDE ES
ROCK VIEW ES
SEQUOYAH ES
SINGER ES
STRAWBERRY KNOLL ES
WATERS LANDING ES

Moderate High FARMS:
ARCOLA ES
BROOKHAVEN ES
BROWN STATION ES
BURNT MILLS ES
CANNON ROAD ES
CARL SANDBURG LC
CLOPPER MILL ES
CRESTHAVEN ES
DALY ES
FAIRLAND ES
FLOWER HILL ES
GALWAY ES
GEORGIAN FOREST ES
GREENCASTLE ES
HARMONY HILLS ES
HIGHLAND ES
JACKSON ROAD ES
LAKE SENECA ES
OAK VIEW ES
ROSEMONT ES
SHRIVER ES
STEDWICK ES
STRATHMORE ES
TWINBROOK ES
VIERS MILL ES
WASHINGTON GROVE ES
WELLER ROAD ES
WHETSTONE ES

High FARMS:
GAITHERSBURG ES
KEMP MILL ES
LELECK ES
ROLLING TERRACE ES
SOUTH LAKE ES
SUMMIT HALL ES
WATKINS MILL ES
WHEATON WOODS ES
Anonymous
The drive was removed. My child had much higher scores and was never even considered for the magnet programs.
Anonymous
Thanks for starting this thread, OP. My DD has straight As and is 95th percentile in MAP-M/96th percentile for MAP-R in a low-moderate FARMS elementary. It would take an act of god for us to consider one of the programs, were she to get in, mostly because she’d have to get up so much earlier to get there. We’ll see, I guess.
Anonymous
Wow, STEM magnet with a 60th percentile score. I can see giving some boost for higher FARM rates, but this seems excessive. 60th national percentile might actually be below average in MCPS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow, STEM magnet with a 60th percentile score. I can see giving some boost for higher FARM rates, but this seems excessive. 60th national percentile might actually be below average in MCPS.


I'm going to ask a dumb question. If a child is in 60th percentile and another child is in the 92% percentile, aren't' the 2 children at different levels? How does attending the magnet program help either student?
Anonymous
Don't be petty. The high FARM schools are just 8 schools, and I guarantee the kids there are not up against your kids for the magnet spots.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow, STEM magnet with a 60th percentile score. I can see giving some boost for higher FARM rates, but this seems excessive. 60th national percentile might actually be below average in MCPS.


I'm going to ask a dumb question. If a child is in 60th percentile and another child is in the 92% percentile, aren't' the 2 children at different levels? How does attending the magnet program help either student?


They are, but the theory MCPS is working with here is that the MS magnets aren't just for kids who are already high achievers, but also for those who have the potential to excel and would not have a peer group at their home MS. The eight elementary schools with that low threshold are also *incredibly* high needs. Unlike some of the moderate FARMS schools, there really are very few MS kids in those eight schools. They exist, but these are schools with 90+ percent of kids receiving FARMS. So, there's a good chance that any random kid you pull out of that pool is experiencing real poverty, may be an English Language Learner, and has parents who may not speak English and may not have the resources to push in extensive prep.

So, the MCPS theory is that a kid hitting 60% with those disadvantages might have the same potential as a kid hitting 95% with every advantage in the world.

Of course, it's not a perfect system because it's based on averages. Not every single kid at Arcola is poor, and not every single kid at Bethesda is getting test prep on the weekends, but MCPS is looking at averages.
Anonymous
Funny thing is that they had abilities-related testing, dropped it during remote learning, used a flexible wide-net paradigm on achievement scores to make up for that, but then dropped the flexibility.but didn't add back the ability measure, relying on the one FARMS adjustment and still requiring the As and reading levels that those in those difficult circumstances might not achieve in the first place, despite some having high potential. They need to go back to using ability scores with a flexible heuristic or some other means that better identifies that potential, lottery (due to roo few spots) or no.
Anonymous
It seems like the magnets have been watered down, as have the CES programs. It would be better to have enriched courses in English and Science (not just math and social studies) avaialble at all schools, with magnets reserved for the highest-achieving kids.
Anonymous
I am new to school system. My kid is in kindergarten.
What should I look for. I have no idea about lottery system or magnate program. Where do I find these out. I want to give my kids the best opportunity but I don’t understand anything in the system. Can u please guide me
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I am new to school system. My kid is in kindergarten.
What should I look for. I have no idea about lottery system or magnate program. Where do I find these out. I want to give my kids the best opportunity but I don’t understand anything in the system. Can u please guide me


The first time your child will be considered for a magnet program is in 3rd grade to receive a slot in the 4th/5th grade centers for enriched studies. The selection process may look very different by then, so hang tight for now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow, STEM magnet with a 60th percentile score. I can see giving some boost for higher FARM rates, but this seems excessive. 60th national percentile might actually be below average in MCPS.


I'm going to ask a dumb question. If a child is in 60th percentile and another child is in the 92% percentile, aren't' the 2 children at different levels? How does attending the magnet program help either student?


They are, but the theory MCPS is working with here is that the MS magnets aren't just for kids who are already high achievers, but also for those who have the potential to excel and would not have a peer group at their home MS. The eight elementary schools with that low threshold are also *incredibly* high needs. Unlike some of the moderate FARMS schools, there really are very few MS kids in those eight schools. They exist, but these are schools with 90+ percent of kids receiving FARMS. So, there's a good chance that any random kid you pull out of that pool is experiencing real poverty, may be an English Language Learner, and has parents who may not speak English and may not have the resources to push in extensive prep.

So, the MCPS theory is that a kid hitting 60% with those disadvantages might have the same potential as a kid hitting 95% with every advantage in the world.

Of course, it's not a perfect system because it's based on averages. Not every single kid at Arcola is poor, and not every single kid at Bethesda is getting test prep on the weekends, but MCPS is looking at averages.

What I am curious about are three things. First, whether MCPS has any data on the educational impact of FARMS students moving from high FARMS to low FARMS schools? Second, I would like to understand how they consider this scenario: a non-FARMS student in a high FARMs school receiving advantage in selection than a FARMS student in a low FARMS school. Perhaps that is the goal? Third, what is the appropriate level of education to meet the needs of the high performing kids that are not selected?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It seems like the magnets have been watered down, as have the CES programs. It would be better to have enriched courses in English and Science (not just math and social studies) avaialble at all schools, with magnets reserved for the highest-achieving kids.

+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It seems like the magnets have been watered down, as have the CES programs. It would be better to have enriched courses in English and Science (not just math and social studies) avaialble at all schools, with magnets reserved for the highest-achieving kids.

+1


Currently they have advanced social studies at my local middle school. It’s ridiculous, my child is in the 6 th grade HIGH social studies class and they meet only once a week or sometimes even once every 2 weeks for “enrichment studies.” In theory having enrichment courses at the local school would have been great but of course mcps has to f*** that up to.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow, STEM magnet with a 60th percentile score. I can see giving some boost for higher FARM rates, but this seems excessive. 60th national percentile might actually be below average in MCPS.


I'm going to ask a dumb question. If a child is in 60th percentile and another child is in the 92% percentile, aren't' the 2 children at different levels? How does attending the magnet program help either student?


They are, but the theory MCPS is working with here is that the MS magnets aren't just for kids who are already high achievers, but also for those who have the potential to excel and would not have a peer group at their home MS. The eight elementary schools with that low threshold are also *incredibly* high needs. Unlike some of the moderate FARMS schools, there really are very few MS kids in those eight schools. They exist, but these are schools with 90+ percent of kids receiving FARMS. So, there's a good chance that any random kid you pull out of that pool is experiencing real poverty, may be an English Language Learner, and has parents who may not speak English and may not have the resources to push in extensive prep.

So, the MCPS theory is that a kid hitting 60% with those disadvantages might have the same potential as a kid hitting 95% with every advantage in the world.

Of course, it's not a perfect system because it's based on averages. Not every single kid at Arcola is poor, and not every single kid at Bethesda is getting test prep on the weekends, but MCPS is looking at averages.

What I am curious about are three things. First, whether MCPS has any data on the educational impact of FARMS students moving from high FARMS to low FARMS schools? Second, I would like to understand how they consider this scenario: a non-FARMS student in a high FARMs school receiving advantage in selection than a FARMS student in a low FARMS school. Perhaps that is the goal? Third, what is the appropriate level of education to meet the needs of the high performing kids that are not selected?



I think right now they're just letting in more mediocre non-farm students from high farm schools into the programs. It's a penalty for farm students living in non-farm school neighborhood. It would be interesting to see current 6th and 7th grade magnet program MAP profile side by side comparison with all other individual MS MAP profile. I suspect some schools in low farm area may even outperform magnet programs. MCPS need to address the needs for high performing students that are not selected through lottery.
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: