2024 Girls Lax WCAC ISL Outlook

[Anonymous]

While on the topic of classless: SR players and family on sidelines cheering on visi’s loss. Many of these girls play club together. Typical SR behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While on the topic of classless: SR players and family on sidelines cheering on visi’s loss. Many of these girls play club together. Typical SR behavior.

Aren’t they each other big rival? When I was in high school. I always cheered with my rival lost.

[Anonymous]

SR has a number of girls that play for Skywalkers and M&D Black and they have club teammates that play for Roland Park and BMS. They have friends on all of these teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Big and much needed with for Potomac over Collegiate.

I assume you mean win, but still, you're just embarrassing yourself at this point. They are not in the same class as IAAM and the big teams around here. Just accept it and move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SR has a number of girls that play for Skywalkers and M&D Black and they have club teammates that play for Roland Park and BMS. They have friends on all of these teams.

What’s the number?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your complaining about 1 call. I was right classless. Both teams played hard and tough.
GC won because they deserved it. For years BI owned GC and never intentionally tried to run the score up on any team. BI lost a lot in 2 years of horrible mean girl coaching. New coach has them back on track and on the way up. They are 10-3 with 2 losses to teams in the top 6 in the country and should be proud.
I would like to say I hope the BI coach would return the favor soon but I believe she has more class then that.

Please, BI apologists, stop your whining and deflecting and accept your humiliating loss and move on.

If BI stinks what’s that say about Potomac and Visitation? I would throw in Stone Ridge, but I am guessing that some of you would say something about play dates and indoor don’t count.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your complaining about 1 call. I was right classless. Both teams played hard and tough.
GC won because they deserved it. For years BI owned GC and never intentionally tried to run the score up on any team. BI lost a lot in 2 years of horrible mean girl coaching. New coach has them back on track and on the way up. They are 10-3 with 2 losses to teams in the top 6 in the country and should be proud.
I would like to say I hope the BI coach would return the favor soon but I believe she has more class then that.

Please, BI apologists, stop your whining and deflecting and accept your humiliating loss and move on.

If BI stinks what’s that say about Potomac and Visitation? I would throw in Stone Ridge, but I am guessing that some of you would say something about play dates and indoor don’t count.

I guess this BI PP (apologist) doesn't know the definition of deflection. Please accept that you got a whuppin' put on you by GC. We don't care what you did vs anyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SR has a number of girls that play for Skywalkers and M&D Black and they have club teammates that play for Roland Park and BMS. They have friends on all of these teams.

What’s the number?

Maybe 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your complaining about 1 call. I was right classless. Both teams played hard and tough.
GC won because they deserved it. For years BI owned GC and never intentionally tried to run the score up on any team. BI lost a lot in 2 years of horrible mean girl coaching. New coach has them back on track and on the way up. They are 10-3 with 2 losses to teams in the top 6 in the country and should be proud.
I would like to say I hope the BI coach would return the favor soon but I believe she has more class then that.

Please, BI apologists, stop your whining and deflecting and accept your humiliating loss and move on.

If BI stinks what’s that say about Potomac and Visitation? I would throw in Stone Ridge, but I am guessing that some of you would say something about play dates and indoor don’t count.

I am not a BI parent but I definitely would not say BI stinks- not Potomac not visi. All the teams have good days and bad. Bi had a bad game against the best team near the dmv.

It is my opinion that the playing field will be more level next year- gc will graduate their top players- their underclass is solid but not the caliber of the ‘24 class. Gc does have the best goalie tho. BI looses many ‘24s and the ‘25 class has only a few good players. Potomac will be about the same. Visi about the same. SR probably the same. SSSA probably about the same. SJC will likely drop in play level with their ‘24 graduates and a weak ‘25 class.

It’s all one big cycle with similar teams showing up each year.

Let’s celebrate the girls’ successes this year, that the girls love the sport, we love to watch them play and be happy that they are healthy and happy!

Saying one of the local competitive team stinks is just not accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your complaining about 1 call. I was right classless. Both teams played hard and tough.
GC won because they deserved it. For years BI owned GC and never intentionally tried to run the score up on any team. BI lost a lot in 2 years of horrible mean girl coaching. New coach has them back on track and on the way up. They are 10-3 with 2 losses to teams in the top 6 in the country and should be proud.
I would like to say I hope the BI coach would return the favor soon but I believe she has more class then that.

Please, BI apologists, stop your whining and deflecting and accept your humiliating loss and move on.

If BI stinks what’s that say about Potomac and Visitation? I would throw in Stone Ridge, but I am guessing that some of you would say something about play dates and indoor don’t count.

I am not a BI parent but I definitely would not say BI stinks- not Potomac not visi. All the teams have good days and bad. Bi had a bad game against the best team near the dmv.

It is my opinion that the playing field will be more level next year- gc will graduate their top players- their underclass is solid but not the caliber of the ‘24 class. Gc does have the best goalie tho. BI looses many ‘24s and the ‘25 class has only a few good players. Potomac will be about the same. Visi about the same. SR probably the same. SSSA probably about the same. SJC will likely drop in play level with their ‘24 graduates and a weak ‘25 class.

It’s all one big cycle with similar teams showing up each year.

Let’s celebrate the girls’ successes this year, that the girls love the sport, we love to watch them play and be happy that they are healthy and happy!

Saying one of the local competitive team stinks is just not accurate.

I’m going to take wild a$$ guess you are a…GC parent of an underclassmen.

Next year SR and Potomac will both have committed Senior Cap Blue goalies, PVI will have a junior goalie who will be starting in her third year, Saints will have 2 junior goalies who both are on Capital, and Visi will have 2 Capital goalies.

Your goalie is good but she’s one of many very good goalies in the area. This year she is the goalie of the best team, not the best goalie. I’m sure she’ll be great - when she is an upperclassman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Big and much needed with for Potomac over Collegiate.

They didn’t play collegiate they played st Catherine’s which is not a good team

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big and much needed with for Potomac over Collegiate.

They didn’t play collegiate they played st Catherine’s which is not a good team

Well, they played Collegiate the day before. No scores are posted anywhere, and Collegiate doesn't even have that game on the schedule (so maybe they didn't play--it's on Potomac's schedule). With that said, St. Catherine's beat Collegiate, so I don't think either team are that great. Both athletic schools, so certainly not bad, but still, not IAAM A level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big and much needed with for Potomac over Collegiate.

They didn’t play collegiate they played st Catherine’s which is not a good team

They played both Collegiate and St. Catherine's

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big and much needed with for Potomac over Collegiate.

They didn’t play collegiate they played st Catherine’s which is not a good team

They played both Collegiate and St. Catherine's

They BEAT both Collegiate and St. Catherine's

[Anonymous]

Scores - Records

This is a pretty good source for scores and records.

https://www.laxnumbers.com/ratings.php?y=2024&v=4086