Bill Barr shut down 7 side investigations started by Mueller.
In plain sight. |
Believable. Although if that’s the case, why don’t they move on the high pitched little crook? |
Wait what? What did I miss? |
DNC and Steele are not in the report. |
Which should be telling on the lies and spin Hannity and others have been spouting to try to confuse and cover their own arses. |
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/ag-bill-barr-killed-7-robert-mueller-investigations-10-days-after-he-submitted-his-report/
|
I don't think that means what you think it means. |
No, it's not really believable. You think that Mueller, with his 19 high-paid attorneys and 40 FBI agents couldn't uncover "treasonous" activity from Kushner but some Twitter warrior could? LOL. |
The Mueller report? Such a thorough investigation! Such closure! A lion of the justice department. What a soft fart into the wind. At least we got our exoneration. Thanks Bobby? |
Mueller to testify July 17.
|
Given Mueller's obvious discomfort in front of the camera last time, and his statement that he would not provide more information than what was in the report, I have doubts as to the political impact of this open session. Ethically, it's the right thing to do. Politically, I wish that a live Mueller asnwering questions on TV would out impeachment numbers over Pelosi's threshold. Sadly, I fear it won't move the needle. Will Republicans actually listen when Mueller tells them: "While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."? Unless he can avoid the double negative and clarify that statement, it won't make any difference. |
^Politically, I wish that Mueller answering questions on live TV would put impeachment numbers over Pelosi's threshold.
- Sorry for the typos. |
Loser Muelller fell too far down the news cycle so he will reluctantly appear!!! What a jerk. |
What an odd statement. |
Signifying nothing. |