How likely for save act to pass senate?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
It shows that their goals are really 1) using unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud as a wedge issue to stir up their base and/or 2) voter suppression. They know voter fraud isn’t costing them elections, but the will of the majority of Americans would. |
Anonymous
won't believe this. Trump will make a call. and enough will cave. |
Anonymous
I don't know if you're paying attention. Being maga Trump aligned is not the electoral flex it was. |
Anonymous
|
It’s a safeguarding, from a standpoint of voter eligibility.
And we’re taking a look at some of the elegies. Voter legibility needs to be safeguarded. And safeguarded very strongly. Nobotty has more integrity than Trump, Nobotty. |
Anonymous
If the filibuster goes away, it will damage GOP senators who use it to shield themselves from MAGA. Also, count on a pro-choice law, DC statehood and a whole host of other reforms the minute the dems get control. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
Thillis, Murkowski, Collins, and McConnell equals no chance. It doesn't even matter who the other three are. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
|
As I understand it, under the SAVE act, a birth certificate would be accepted as valid proof of citizenship, but an expired passport would not. I am not particularly woke, and think that the left is so focused on looking for offense, that sometimes it overestimates the actual fault. However, it is hard to see how an administration can claim to be acting in good faith when it prioritizes birth certificates that are older documents that lack any sort of picture, over an expired passport which was almost certainly issued more recently and more current document and comes with a photo. I’m sure the fact that men are more likely to retain their name as listed on their birth certificate and thus be eligible to use it is merely a coincidence. 🙄
Moreover, why aren’t people linking the fact that the president who is pushing to ensure that only citizens can vote is also trying to redefine citizenship in violation of the Constitution, an attempt which the Supreme Court has yet to rule on? Not to mention, he has frequently accused political opponents of treason, especially those whom he blames for stealing an election (with any election he loses being identified as “stolen”). It does not seem to require much imagination to conceive of a future where political opponents have their citizenship revoked. |
Anonymous
|
I’m 52 years old and have no idea where my birth certificate is. I’ve been married divorced once and remarried so three different names as record. I’m not an exception.
|
Anonymous
Anonymous
|
That person didn’t vote because the human error that allowed him to register was caught before he left the building. Also Tim DeFoer, the Pennsylvania Auditor General who conducted this review, is a Republican. 
|