Maine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I find it ironic the Democrats spent years accusing the Republicans of being Nazis and warning of far right MAGA fascists and yet there's Platner! With a genuine Nazi tattoo! And they're going to make him their senate candidate!The hypocrisy is staggering.

ARE YOU SERIOUS WITH THIS SH*T WHEN PETE HEGSETH IS THE SoD?!

You're such disgusting ppl knowing full-well that you can't find any actual "Nazi" thoughts from Platner while Hegseth's, his tattoos and his entire existence is based on being one!

You need to tell us about Pete Hegseth's Nazi tattoos.
Please elaborate.

+1
Pete Hegseth has no Nazi tattoos, as much as these idiots keep claiming otherwise. From a few pages back:

-Since U.S. President Donald Trump initially nominated Pete Hegseth as defense secretary, social media posts have claimed Hegseth wears white supremacist, Christian nationalist or Nazi tattoos.
-Hegseth has about 12 tattoos on his right arm and chest, all of which are references to his military service and patriotism, and to his Christian faith.
-None of the tattoos is a swastika, despite online claims to the contrary.
-While some have theorized that one of Hegseth's tattoos contains a covert reference to a neo-Nazi symbol, that theory is questionable at best. ----It's important to note that neo-Nazis often rely on plausible deniability to hide their symbolism. With that caveat, there is no clear evidence that any of Hegseth's tattoos represent a sympathy for or commitment to white supremacist or Nazi views.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/10/05/hegseth-nazi-tattoos/

Honest question. Are Jews the only people important to you people. So, no anti-Jewish aka Nazi, but anti-everything else is okay. Yall give a pass to Hegsbreath because he is not a Nazi towards Jewish people. However, he is a Nazi or shows Naziesque actions towards other groups, but that's okay for many of you people. Hegsbreath is anti-Black, anti-women, anti-Islam, anti-gay, anti-non-evangelical Christian, anti-anti, anti. MFrackers caping for this POS and thinking he is any different or better than Platner are FOS, and probably think Hegsbreath is okay in his hatred.

Are you speaking English? And it’s Kegsbreath. At least get the joke right.

Is this supposed to be a crack? You failed.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

I just wrote a blog post about this. Lyndsey Fifield herself started an organization aimed at discrediting Christine Blasey Ford. This was just a couple of years after Fifield says that she had been in an abusive relationship. If her relationship with Platner was as abusive as she says, she doesn't appear to have gained much empathy from it. Regardless, as I wrote in my blog, it is reasonable to have the same doubts about Fifield as Fifield clearly had about Blasey Ford.

Except that anyone who "had doubts" about CBF was called all sorts of names for not "believing all women." Remember that?
DP

That’s what is happening to those who have doubts about Fifield, including by you.

You seem to be deliberately ignoring the point - which is why were so many Democrats, including you, so utterly outraged over an allegation of teenaged groping, yet now so completely willing to chalk up Platner's bad behavior and comments as "he was young and stupid, all is forgiven"?

Not to mention, why did you believe CBF without reservation (even with zero substantiation) but now call Fifield a liar - when she actually does have evidence in the form of old text messages? Don't you find this just a wee bit hypocritical?

You are a liar and presenting false information. I have never called Fifield a liar. In my blog post, I explicitly said that I am not calling her a liar. I have never said that Platner is forgiven for his alleged behavior.

You need to take a good look in the mirror and reconsider which of us is a hypocrite. You are not treating Blasey Ford's and Fifield's allegations equally. You are allowing political motivations to determine your opinion. Moreover, you are behaving exactly like you claim Kavanaugh's opponents were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you compare base facts between Kavanaugh and Platner, Platner comes off worse. I personally do not see how anyone who believed Ford and opposed Kavanaugh can support Platner. Kavanaugh was a high schooler at the time of the alleged assault and there was no contemporaneous evidence of the alleged assault, whereas Platner was an adult and there is some contemporaneous evidence, albeit imperfect. Ford went first to Anna Eshoo and then Feinstein, Platner’s accuser is a conservative activist (but this happened in the days before DC was so polarized; that sort of dating wasn’t rare); that washes out. There are more women allegedly in the wings with more than there were with Kavanaugh. And, there weren’t any adult accusations of Kavanaugh, it was from when he was a teen.

I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

Probably because the other five women had an entirely different experience, and they are also not attached to a political agenda as this one woman obviously is. Also, why is everyone calling it sexual assault? Where was the sexual assault allegation, or is it simply that her gender makes it sexual?

So again, all of the other women who had relationships with Platner and said he was a decent guy and was not at all abusive are all a bunch of lying scumbags to be ignored?

Did you ignore the 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school at the time of the alleged assault and signed a letter of support for him?

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/04/654303304/longtime-friend-defends-kavanaugh-against-sexual-assault-allegations

Yeah right, I doubt Kavanaugh even had 65 female friends in high school to begin with, let alone them remembering who the hell he was back then.

DP. You're completely proving the PPs point. You don't want to believe any support of Kavanaugh because you don't like him. And yet, he has/had tons of female friends, both in high school, and as an adult. RBG praised him for being the justice who hired the most female clerks. But I'm sure you've totally dismissed those facts.

Not at all. It's not credible in the first place. That "letter" was released within FOUR HOURS of Ford's allegations becoming public. You couldn't possibly reach out to 65 different women who you hadn't been in contact with for decades and get them to sign on to a letter that quickly. Clearly there is something very fishy about that "letter" - if anything the letter would have had to have been organized months in advance of allegations, if it was even real at all. That's not my opinion, either - numerous reporters and commentators believed the letter was fishy. First of all, they weren't high school classmates, as Georgetown Prep where Kavanaugh attended was an all-boys school. The women whose names appeared attended totally different schools or were friends of friends who didn't even know Kavanaugh well. Additionally, numerous women who allegedly signed the letter were either unable to be reached for followup by reporters, or when contacted said thy felt misled, they signed before knowing any of the details, or that they never would have signed, knowing what they later found out about the allegations.

Spin, spin, spin. Some of the women didn't want to speak out publicly, but they absolutely signed their name to the letter vouching for Kavanaugh. And of course they attended different schools - the Catholic boys and girls schools do plenty of things together socially and run in the same circles. You're just making up nonsense that never even happened.

"How did it come together so quickly? The women who organized and signed the letter said it was thanks to social networks that had endured decades after they graduated. They say it was easy to mobilize support: a chain of friends calling, texting and emailing other friends. It helped that they were from a Washington-area world where many still live and see each other."
https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/best-of-the-states/2018/how-65-women-came-to-kavanaughs-defense/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you compare base facts between Kavanaugh and Platner, Platner comes off worse. I personally do not see how anyone who believed Ford and opposed Kavanaugh can support Platner. Kavanaugh was a high schooler at the time of the alleged assault and there was no contemporaneous evidence of the alleged assault, whereas Platner was an adult and there is some contemporaneous evidence, albeit imperfect. Ford went first to Anna Eshoo and then Feinstein, Platner’s accuser is a conservative activist (but this happened in the days before DC was so polarized; that sort of dating wasn’t rare); that washes out. There are more women allegedly in the wings with more than there were with Kavanaugh. And, there weren’t any adult accusations of Kavanaugh, it was from when he was a teen.

I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

Probably because the other five women had an entirely different experience, and they are also not attached to a political agenda as this one woman obviously is. Also, why is everyone calling it sexual assault? Where was the sexual assault allegation, or is it simply that her gender makes it sexual?

So again, all of the other women who had relationships with Platner and said he was a decent guy and was not at all abusive are all a bunch of lying scumbags to be ignored?

Did you ignore the 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school at the time of the alleged assault and signed a letter of support for him?

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/04/654303304/longtime-friend-defends-kavanaugh-against-sexual-assault-allegations

Yeah right, I doubt Kavanaugh even had 65 female friends in high school to begin with, let alone them remembering who the hell he was back then.

DP. You're completely proving the PPs point. You don't want to believe any support of Kavanaugh because you don't like him. And yet, he has/had tons of female friends, both in high school, and as an adult. RBG praised him for being the justice who hired the most female clerks. But I'm sure you've totally dismissed those facts.

Not at all. It's not credible in the first place. That "letter" was released within FOUR HOURS of Ford's allegations becoming public. You couldn't possibly reach out to 65 different women who you hadn't been in contact with for decades and get them to sign on to a letter that quickly. Clearly there is something very fishy about that "letter" - if anything the letter would have had to have been organized months in advance of allegations, if it was even real at all. That's not my opinion, either - numerous reporters and commentators believed the letter was fishy. First of all, they weren't high school classmates, as Georgetown Prep where Kavanaugh attended was an all-boys school. The women whose names appeared attended totally different schools or were friends of friends who didn't even know Kavanaugh well. Additionally, numerous women who allegedly signed the letter were either unable to be reached for followup by reporters, or when contacted said thy felt misled, they signed before knowing any of the details, or that they never would have signed, knowing what they later found out about the allegations.

I could go on the class year insta page for my high school and get probably 150 signatures for something important within an hour. Have you ever used social media.

+1
Same with FB - we have a page for graduates of our year, as does every other high school. I was just included on a letter for our reunion this fall, along with 400 other people. Getting 65 people to sign that letter would have been very easy, especially since they all knew him and were happy to vouch for his character.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you compare base facts between Kavanaugh and Platner, Platner comes off worse. I personally do not see how anyone who believed Ford and opposed Kavanaugh can support Platner. Kavanaugh was a high schooler at the time of the alleged assault and there was no contemporaneous evidence of the alleged assault, whereas Platner was an adult and there is some contemporaneous evidence, albeit imperfect. Ford went first to Anna Eshoo and then Feinstein, Platner’s accuser is a conservative activist (but this happened in the days before DC was so polarized; that sort of dating wasn’t rare); that washes out. There are more women allegedly in the wings with more than there were with Kavanaugh. And, there weren’t any adult accusations of Kavanaugh, it was from when he was a teen.

I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

Probably because the other five women had an entirely different experience, and they are also not attached to a political agenda as this one woman obviously is. Also, why is everyone calling it sexual assault? Where was the sexual assault allegation, or is it simply that her gender makes it sexual?

So again, all of the other women who had relationships with Platner and said he was a decent guy and was not at all abusive are all a bunch of lying scumbags to be ignored?

Did you ignore the 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school at the time of the alleged assault and signed a letter of support for him?

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/04/654303304/longtime-friend-defends-kavanaugh-against-sexual-assault-allegations

Yeah right, I doubt Kavanaugh even had 65 female friends in high school to begin with, let alone them remembering who the hell he was back then.

DP. You're completely proving the PPs point. You don't want to believe any support of Kavanaugh because you don't like him. And yet, he has/had tons of female friends, both in high school, and as an adult. RBG praised him for being the justice who hired the most female clerks. But I'm sure you've totally dismissed those facts.

Not at all. It's not credible in the first place. That "letter" was released within FOUR HOURS of Ford's allegations becoming public. You couldn't possibly reach out to 65 different women who you hadn't been in contact with for decades and get them to sign on to a letter that quickly. Clearly there is something very fishy about that "letter" - if anything the letter would have had to have been organized months in advance of allegations, if it was even real at all. That's not my opinion, either - numerous reporters and commentators believed the letter was fishy. First of all, they weren't high school classmates, as Georgetown Prep where Kavanaugh attended was an all-boys school. The women whose names appeared attended totally different schools or were friends of friends who didn't even know Kavanaugh well. Additionally, numerous women who allegedly signed the letter were either unable to be reached for followup by reporters, or when contacted said thy felt misled, they signed before knowing any of the details, or that they never would have signed, knowing what they later found out about the allegations.

I could go on the class year insta page for my high school and get probably 150 signatures for something important within an hour. Have you ever used social media.

Sure, kid. Except, Kavanaugh isn't from the Instagram generation, genius. He wouldn't even have 150 high school classmates on that platform to begin with.

OMG. Are you really this obtuse? I'm the same age as Kavanaugh and everyone we know is on FB, if not also IG. Do you live under a rock?
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you compare base facts between Kavanaugh and Platner, Platner comes off worse. I personally do not see how anyone who believed Ford and opposed Kavanaugh can support Platner. Kavanaugh was a high schooler at the time of the alleged assault and there was no contemporaneous evidence of the alleged assault, whereas Platner was an adult and there is some contemporaneous evidence, albeit imperfect. Ford went first to Anna Eshoo and then Feinstein, Platner’s accuser is a conservative activist (but this happened in the days before DC was so polarized; that sort of dating wasn’t rare); that washes out. There are more women allegedly in the wings with more than there were with Kavanaugh. And, there weren’t any adult accusations of Kavanaugh, it was from when he was a teen.

I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

Probably because the other five women had an entirely different experience, and they are also not attached to a political agenda as this one woman obviously is. Also, why is everyone calling it sexual assault? Where was the sexual assault allegation, or is it simply that her gender makes it sexual?

So again, all of the other women who had relationships with Platner and said he was a decent guy and was not at all abusive are all a bunch of lying scumbags to be ignored?

Did you ignore the 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school at the time of the alleged assault and signed a letter of support for him?

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/04/654303304/longtime-friend-defends-kavanaugh-against-sexual-assault-allegations

Yeah right, I doubt Kavanaugh even had 65 female friends in high school to begin with, let alone them remembering who the hell he was back then.

DP. You're completely proving the PPs point. You don't want to believe any support of Kavanaugh because you don't like him. And yet, he has/had tons of female friends, both in high school, and as an adult. RBG praised him for being the justice who hired the most female clerks. But I'm sure you've totally dismissed those facts.

Not at all. It's not credible in the first place. That "letter" was released within FOUR HOURS of Ford's allegations becoming public. You couldn't possibly reach out to 65 different women who you hadn't been in contact with for decades and get them to sign on to a letter that quickly. Clearly there is something very fishy about that "letter" - if anything the letter would have had to have been organized months in advance of allegations, if it was even real at all. That's not my opinion, either - numerous reporters and commentators believed the letter was fishy. First of all, they weren't high school classmates, as Georgetown Prep where Kavanaugh attended was an all-boys school. The women whose names appeared attended totally different schools or were friends of friends who didn't even know Kavanaugh well. Additionally, numerous women who allegedly signed the letter were either unable to be reached for followup by reporters, or when contacted said thy felt misled, they signed before knowing any of the details, or that they never would have signed, knowing what they later found out about the allegations.

I could go on the class year insta page for my high school and get probably 150 signatures for something important within an hour. Have you ever used social media.

Sure, kid. Except, Kavanaugh isn't from the Instagram generation, genius. He wouldn't even have 150 high school classmates on that platform to begin with.

And he didn’t have any high school classmates who were women.

All of those women went to the Catholic sister schools of Gtown Prep and they all knew and socialized together. The fact that you're pretending otherwise is pretty comical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a prize, but eyes on the prize

He's a real prize! Looks like a Will Forte character.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, look...more dirt on the scumbag Republican woman quoted in the article. You have to be a moron not to see the agenda of those trying to destroy Platner:

She started the group "Ladies for (Brett)Kavanaugh"

But but but you told us we had to believe Kavanaugh’s accuser without question even if there was far less contemporaneous evidence than there is here. Hm, it’s almost as if you have no morals.

TBH I'm not following this closely, but why would a woman who was abused by Platner, stand against Kavanaugh's accuser? If she wants people to believe her, why wouldn't she believe CBF?

Either it's insane cognitive dissonance or pure political ploy -- both times!

Because she was being paid to attack CBF.

Plattner's mistake is that he didn't put these women on his campaign payroll.

It’s only one woman.

There were three women who described their relationships with Platner, in addition to interviews with over two dozen people.
DP

There were six women who described their relationship with Platner. Three gave him a good boyfriend review. Two gave him a not-so-good boyfriend review. And one, the person who worked for Susan Collins, Nikki Haley, and The Heritage Foundation, said he was abusive because he grabbed her arm, locked her in the bedroom and told her to calm down.

And told her he wanted to rape any home intruder. If someone said something like that to me, I'd be out of there so fast. But YDY.

And yet she didn't. She stayed in the relationship and even posted online how good-looking and nice he was. Hmm. Well, I can't trust her judgment or her ability to tell the truth, for her truth was that Platner was good-looking. What else is she wrong about.

Interesting take. So I guess you think P. Diddy was an ok dude because the girlfriend he abused stayed with him. Listen to you! Such a "believer of women." You are just disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main subject thinks she was set up by the NYT to help Platner:

In the end, I don’t think she’s any different than any other woman who has tried to stand up to tell the truth about a man. It’s just a question of which side savages the whistleblower.

Wow, that was powerful. I don't blame her for feeling used. She provided them with everything they asked for, and more - which they didn't even use. Now they've painted her as some kind of political operative when she was simply recounting her experiences with Platner. Pretty gross behavior for the NYT to have so blatantly portrayed her in this way instead of, you know, "believing all women".

They totally softened the description of her political activism.

So? He also dated a Democrat who said he was "reckless and unsettling." Face it, you don't actually "believe all women."

Reckless and unsettling in what way? Did she describe what she meant by that? What was the context of this recklessness, spending, actions, driving, promiscuity, what exactly? When did they date? Was it fifteen years ago in his twenties, or three years ago? Are you the same person at 21, at 31, at 41 years of age? Timing is everything.

Great point! Did you believe the allegation of groping against a TEENAGED Kavanaugh? If you did believe it, did you also believe he had grown into a respectable man who is a pillar of his community? I mean, timing is everything, right? Or does that expansively forgiving attitude only apply to *checks notes* Democrats?

If you were not so entrenched in your own BS and biases and imbued with the ability to comprehend, you already know the answer to your silly question. Now go back and read with understanding instead of reading to counterpunch and respond.

It's funny how you refuse to answer straightforward questions but so very telling. You're more than willing to forgive mistakes made by young men - IF THEY'RE DEMOCRATS - but happy to join in a witchhunt against teenaged boys - IF THEY'RE REPUBLICANS. Glad we cleared that up, you tremendous hypocrite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you compare base facts between Kavanaugh and Platner, Platner comes off worse. I personally do not see how anyone who believed Ford and opposed Kavanaugh can support Platner. Kavanaugh was a high schooler at the time of the alleged assault and there was no contemporaneous evidence of the alleged assault, whereas Platner was an adult and there is some contemporaneous evidence, albeit imperfect. Ford went first to Anna Eshoo and then Feinstein, Platner’s accuser is a conservative activist (but this happened in the days before DC was so polarized; that sort of dating wasn’t rare); that washes out. There are more women allegedly in the wings with more than there were with Kavanaugh. And, there weren’t any adult accusations of Kavanaugh, it was from when he was a teen.

I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

Probably because the other five women had an entirely different experience, and they are also not attached to a political agenda as this one woman obviously is. Also, why is everyone calling it sexual assault? Where was the sexual assault allegation, or is it simply that her gender makes it sexual?

So again, all of the other women who had relationships with Platner and said he was a decent guy and was not at all abusive are all a bunch of lying scumbags to be ignored?

Did you ignore the 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school at the time of the alleged assault and signed a letter of support for him?

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/04/654303304/longtime-friend-defends-kavanaugh-against-sexual-assault-allegations

Yeah right, I doubt Kavanaugh even had 65 female friends in high school to begin with, let alone them remembering who the hell he was back then.

DP. You're completely proving the PPs point. You don't want to believe any support of Kavanaugh because you don't like him. And yet, he has/had tons of female friends, both in high school, and as an adult. RBG praised him for being the justice who hired the most female clerks. But I'm sure you've totally dismissed those facts.

Not at all. It's not credible in the first place. That "letter" was released within FOUR HOURS of Ford's allegations becoming public. You couldn't possibly reach out to 65 different women who you hadn't been in contact with for decades and get them to sign on to a letter that quickly. Clearly there is something very fishy about that "letter" - if anything the letter would have had to have been organized months in advance of allegations, if it was even real at all. That's not my opinion, either - numerous reporters and commentators believed the letter was fishy. First of all, they weren't high school classmates, as Georgetown Prep where Kavanaugh attended was an all-boys school. The women whose names appeared attended totally different schools or were friends of friends who didn't even know Kavanaugh well. Additionally, numerous women who allegedly signed the letter were either unable to be reached for followup by reporters, or when contacted said thy felt misled, they signed before knowing any of the details, or that they never would have signed, knowing what they later found out about the allegations.

I could go on the class year insta page for my high school and get probably 150 signatures for something important within an hour. Have you ever used social media.

When did you graduate from HS? Who in the heck is keeping up with HS forty-years out? LOSERS!

DP. My high school 40th reunion is this fall and there has been lots of communication via social media about it. I can see why you wouldn't know about this phenomenon - no doubt the organizers of your reunions have been leaving you off the list, for good reason. Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As we sit here arguing about Platner online, it is only one year ONE YEAR since his wife caught him cheating on their marriage with a half dozen sexting partners and just a couple of months after that he announces a Senate campaign.

Anyone who can’t grasp the impulsive madness that dictates Platner’s existence is very naive and in for a rude awakening.

+1
It's cute how he thought none of his grotesque behaviors would be discovered during a campaign. That shows how unremarkable he considers this kind of behavior. Just a big nothingburger to him. Honestly, I've got very little sympathy for his wife at this point. WTH would she stay with this creep?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

I just wrote a blog post about this. Lyndsey Fifield herself started an organization aimed at discrediting Christine Blasey Ford. This was just a couple of years after Fifield says that she had been in an abusive relationship. If her relationship with Platner was as abusive as she says, she doesn't appear to have gained much empathy from it. Regardless, as I wrote in my blog, it is reasonable to have the same doubts about Fifield as Fifield clearly had about Blasey Ford.

Except that anyone who "had doubts" about CBF was called all sorts of names for not "believing all women." Remember that?
DP

That’s what is happening to those who have doubts about Fifield, including by you.

You seem to be deliberately ignoring the point - which is why were so many Democrats, including you, so utterly outraged over an allegation of teenaged groping, yet now so completely willing to chalk up Platner's bad behavior and comments as "he was young and stupid, all is forgiven"?

Not to mention, why did you believe CBF without reservation (even with zero substantiation) but now call Fifield a liar - when she actually does have evidence in the form of old text messages? Don't you find this just a wee bit hypocritical?

You are a liar and presenting false information. I have never called Fifield a liar. In my blog post, I explicitly said that I am not calling her a liar. I have never said that Platner is forgiven for his alleged behavior.

You need to take a good look in the mirror and reconsider which of us is a hypocrite. You are not treating Blasey Ford's and Fifield's allegations equally. You are allowing political motivations to determine your opinion. Moreover, you are behaving exactly like you claim Kavanaugh's opponents were.

Remember when Democrats believed CBF without question - and screamed at anyone who had their doubts? Remember Democrats protesting during the Kavanaugh hearings?

You personally may not be calling Fifield a liar, but plenty of the same people who believed CBF certainly are. And you don't see anything hypocritical about that? Talk about 'political motivations'... THOSE are the people who are not treating the two allegations equally - and I am calling out THAT hypocrisy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main subject thinks she was set up by the NYT to help Platner:

In the end, I don’t think she’s any different than any other woman who has tried to stand up to tell the truth about a man. It’s just a question of which side savages the whistleblower.

Wow, that was powerful. I don't blame her for feeling used. She provided them with everything they asked for, and more - which they didn't even use. Now they've painted her as some kind of political operative when she was simply recounting her experiences with Platner. Pretty gross behavior for the NYT to have so blatantly portrayed her in this way instead of, you know, "believing all women".

They totally softened the description of her political activism.

So? He also dated a Democrat who said he was "reckless and unsettling." Face it, you don't actually "believe all women."

Reckless and unsettling in what way? Did she describe what she meant by that? What was the context of this recklessness, spending, actions, driving, promiscuity, what exactly? When did they date? Was it fifteen years ago in his twenties, or three years ago? Are you the same person at 21, at 31, at 41 years of age? Timing is everything.

Great point! Did you believe the allegation of groping against a TEENAGED Kavanaugh? If you did believe it, did you also believe he had grown into a respectable man who is a pillar of his community? I mean, timing is everything, right? Or does that expansively forgiving attitude only apply to *checks notes* Democrats?

If you were not so entrenched in your own BS and biases and imbued with the ability to comprehend, you already know the answer to your silly question. Now go back and read with understanding instead of reading to counterpunch and respond.

It's funny how you refuse to answer straightforward questions but so very telling. You're more than willing to forgive mistakes made by young men - IF THEY'RE DEMOCRATS - but happy to join in a witchhunt against teenaged boys - IF THEY'RE REPUBLICANS. Glad we cleared that up, you tremendous hypocrite.

Was Platner accused of attempted rape and sexual assault like Justice Rapey? Because the allegations against one are not the same as the other. Further, one was an overprivileged dbag of the type all of us know. Used to getting away with everything and everyone making excuses for his entitled a--. The other served our country and suffered terrible PTSD that he admits contributed to some very bad behavior, including the the most recent allegations.

Both are bad. They are not both equal.

I'm not a Mainer. And if he was running in my state as a resident, I honestly don't know what I would do. But, at this point, you are comparing the two like they're the same. They're not.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

I just wrote a blog post about this. Lyndsey Fifield herself started an organization aimed at discrediting Christine Blasey Ford. This was just a couple of years after Fifield says that she had been in an abusive relationship. If her relationship with Platner was as abusive as she says, she doesn't appear to have gained much empathy from it. Regardless, as I wrote in my blog, it is reasonable to have the same doubts about Fifield as Fifield clearly had about Blasey Ford.

Except that anyone who "had doubts" about CBF was called all sorts of names for not "believing all women." Remember that?
DP

That’s what is happening to those who have doubts about Fifield, including by you.

You seem to be deliberately ignoring the point - which is why were so many Democrats, including you, so utterly outraged over an allegation of teenaged groping, yet now so completely willing to chalk up Platner's bad behavior and comments as "he was young and stupid, all is forgiven"?

Not to mention, why did you believe CBF without reservation (even with zero substantiation) but now call Fifield a liar - when she actually does have evidence in the form of old text messages? Don't you find this just a wee bit hypocritical?

You are a liar and presenting false information. I have never called Fifield a liar. In my blog post, I explicitly said that I am not calling her a liar. I have never said that Platner is forgiven for his alleged behavior.

You need to take a good look in the mirror and reconsider which of us is a hypocrite. You are not treating Blasey Ford's and Fifield's allegations equally. You are allowing political motivations to determine your opinion. Moreover, you are behaving exactly like you claim Kavanaugh's opponents were.

Remember when Democrats believed CBF without question - and screamed at anyone who had their doubts? Remember Democrats protesting during the Kavanaugh hearings?

You personally may not be calling Fifield a liar, but plenty of the same people who believed CBF certainly are. And you don't see anything hypocritical about that? Talk about 'political motivations'... THOSE are the people who are not treating the two allegations equally - and I am calling out THAT hypocrisy.

You are not treating the allegations equally so you are just as much of a hypocrite as those you making accusations against. You are now the one screaming at anyone who has doubts.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am genuinely trying to understand how Democrats that wholeheartedly supported Ford can continue to support Platner and even worse, attack the woman who came forward so viciously. It seems completely hypocritical.

I just wrote a blog post about this. Lyndsey Fifield herself started an organization aimed at discrediting Christine Blasey Ford. This was just a couple of years after Fifield says that she had been in an abusive relationship. If her relationship with Platner was as abusive as she says, she doesn't appear to have gained much empathy from it. Regardless, as I wrote in my blog, it is reasonable to have the same doubts about Fifield as Fifield clearly had about Blasey Ford.

Except that anyone who "had doubts" about CBF was called all sorts of names for not "believing all women." Remember that?
DP

That’s what is happening to those who have doubts about Fifield, including by you.

You seem to be deliberately ignoring the point - which is why were so many Democrats, including you, so utterly outraged over an allegation of teenaged groping, yet now so completely willing to chalk up Platner's bad behavior and comments as "he was young and stupid, all is forgiven"?

Not to mention, why did you believe CBF without reservation (even with zero substantiation) but now call Fifield a liar - when she actually does have evidence in the form of old text messages? Don't you find this just a wee bit hypocritical?

You are a liar and presenting false information. I have never called Fifield a liar. In my blog post, I explicitly said that I am not calling her a liar. I have never said that Platner is forgiven for his alleged behavior.

You need to take a good look in the mirror and reconsider which of us is a hypocrite. You are not treating Blasey Ford's and Fifield's allegations equally. You are allowing political motivations to determine your opinion. Moreover, you are behaving exactly like you claim Kavanaugh's opponents were.

Remember when Democrats believed CBF without question - and screamed at anyone who had their doubts? Remember Democrats protesting during the Kavanaugh hearings?

You personally may not be calling Fifield a liar, but plenty of the same people who believed CBF certainly are. And you don't see anything hypocritical about that? Talk about 'political motivations'... THOSE are the people who are not treating the two allegations equally - and I am calling out THAT hypocrisy.

You are not treating the allegations equally so you are just as much of a hypocrite as those you making accusations against. You are now the one screaming at anyone who has doubts.

Pointing out their obvious hypocrisy is not "screaming" at them.