War with Iran

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

I’m going to check and see if there were threads complaining about a lack of Congressional approval in bombing Libya, Syria, Pakistan, and Yemen. I’m sure there was Congressional approval given before we killed Bin Laden too.

There are seriously not enough eye rolls in the world for you partisan hack clowns. I remember everyone was called a Putin stooge and an Assad apologist on here for literally not wanting to do what Trump’s doing now in Iran, but in Syria.

I just can’t with you hypocritical partisan fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

OMG we just took out the leadership of the biggest stare supporter of terrorists in the world but we were supposed to do it with zero casualties. We were just supposed to ask nicely for the Ayatollah to not give nuclear suitcase bombs to Hamas and Hezbollah and they would have totes done it!!!

[Anonymous]

LOL, of course the Nazis ran to the Nazis.

ICC is garbage with no teeth:

Israeli government plane parked in Berlin for safety:

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/israeli-government-plane-parked-berlin-safety-2026-03-01/

Gee, if only the despicable Germans "loved" these ppl back then and were actually forced to give their own land 80 years ago for what they did, instead of make the Middle East pay for European Christianity's sins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

It’s borderline insane to talk about this in terms of “saving” people when its the same regime that killed the VA and USAID and god knows that, resulting in how many deaths? The same regime that invades its own cities and murders its own citizens. The same regime covering for pedophiles. The same regime threatening to steal elections. The same regime that started a war IN THE MIDDLE OF NEGOTIATIONS to appease our local Middle East welfare states while we live without healthcare and so many safety nets.

The only agenda now should be trying to keep it together long enough to remove Trump from office.

[Anonymous]

3 U.S. troops KIA.

America First amirite??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

is it possible to book mark a thread? want to see how this ages. really hope for women's liberation in Iran but not convinced this will follow with these strikes.

Exactly! For some reason, talking about the oppression of women and gays by Islam is not politically correct among progressives. Why??

Oh come on. You people are peddling the same BS you peddled in 2001. Oh, the poor Afghan women are oppressed. The gays are treated horribly. The USA needs to bomb them out of the caves to save the women and gays. How that work out for ya. How did it work out for the Afghan women and gays. Twenty-one years later after all the bombing, lost American lives, amputated men and women, brain damaged soldiers and millions and trillions, that's trillions with an S wasted, gone, depleted and the Afghan women and gays are worse off. Same story you continue to peddle and you will get the same result.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

OMG we just took out the leadership of the biggest stare supporter of terrorists in the world but we were supposed to do it with zero casualties. We were just supposed to ask nicely for the Ayatollah to not give nuclear suitcase bombs to Hamas and Hezbollah and they would have totes done it!!!

Why are you so stupid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:3 U.S. troops KIA.

America First amirite??

OMG! Some soldiers died killing Bin Laden too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

So you can't handle the truth. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

OMG we just took out the leadership of the biggest stare supporter of terrorists in the world but we were supposed to do it with zero casualties. We were just supposed to ask nicely for the Ayatollah to not give nuclear suitcase bombs to Hamas and Hezbollah and they would have totes done it!!!

Why are you so stupid?

Why are you reciting Putin propaganda? Are you a Russian asset Vlad?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

How many protesters have been executed in the US by ICE? How many innocent fishman have been killed by republicans. 85 girls were killed in a precision bombing of an all girls school by the Israelis or US. Israel has killed over 100,000 in Gaza plus thousands more in neighboring countries.

How many Palestinians are being held and tortured in Gestapo style prisons in Israel? How many will Israel rape, torture and kill in the next year? When will Israel annex the West Bank?

How many people are killed in death camp in North Korea? How many people have the Russian killed in Ukrainians?


Spare me your concern about the Iranian people when you and your republican brothers cheer the execution of US citizens by masked gunmen, the killing of 100,000 plus Palestinians.

If you want to make the world a better place have regime change in Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

So you can't handle the truth. Got it.

So boring. Wanna try again with something substantive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

OMG we just took out the leadership of the biggest stare supporter of terrorists in the world but we were supposed to do it with zero casualties. We were just supposed to ask nicely for the Ayatollah to not give nuclear suitcase bombs to Hamas and Hezbollah and they would have totes done it!!!

And this is you going full crazy and mentally slow. The Ayatollah did not have any nukes to give to Hamas and Hezbollah. You know who has provided financial and military aid to Hamas, you already know. Say it out loud. You can do it. Benjamin Netanyahu has provided such assistance to Hamas, not once but consistently over the years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

It’s borderline insane to talk about this in terms of “saving” people when its the same regime that killed the VA and USAID and god knows that, resulting in how many deaths? The same regime that invades its own cities and murders its own citizens. The same regime covering for pedophiles. The same regime threatening to steal elections. The same regime that started a war IN THE MIDDLE OF NEGOTIATIONS to appease our local Middle East welfare states while we live without healthcare and so many safety nets.

The only agenda now should be trying to keep it together long enough to remove Trump from office.

FWIW, I agree with you about USAID, getting rid of Trump, etc.

None of that has any relevance to assessing whether the attack on Iran is prudent.