Now we understand the concern about a “domestic supply of infants.”

[Anonymous]

Conservatives don’t want to run out of school children targets.

[Anonymous]

Pretty much.

[Anonymous]

Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

[Anonymous]

I guess we need a "domestic supply" to replace all the kids who are shot all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

+100
Disgusting. Hard to believe this thread is allowed to remain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Your party has decided that sacrificing children to your gun lust is acceptable. You are sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Putting more energy into whining about someone's sarcasm than doing anything about the actual death of the children in order to shield Republican, NRA and industry enablers from sarcastic criticism is far more sick than the sarcasm itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Republicans have blood on their hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Putting more energy into whining about someone's sarcasm than doing anything about the actual death of the children in order to shield Republican, NRA and industry enablers from sarcastic criticism is far more sick than the sarcasm itself.

Making a sarcastic post is so much worse than being anti choice, and at the same time, allowing the assault weapon gun down of children, teachers, shoppers, country music fans, all going about their regular lives?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Republicans have blood on their hands.

I doubt the killer in this case was a Republican.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Republicans have blood on their hands.

I doubt the killer in this case was a Republican.

Are you stupid or something? That doesn’t matter. The point is that this kid had easy access to guns. That is the issue here. Other countries have the same problems we do but not all the shootings. The easy access is the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Republicans have blood on their hands.

I doubt the killer in this case was a Republican.

The gun slinger had plenty of help useless republican gun laws.

And the next one will have the same amount of help if we don't replace these slugs in charge with people that will step up and get serious about removing these weapons from our lives

[Anonymous]

The killer in this case was all Republicans:
An untreated low income kid with mental health issues waiting until his 18 birthday to go out and buy weapons that Republicans don't want to have a waiting period for or evaluation to own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using the death of children to make sarcastic posts and earn internet points. You are sick.

Republicans have blood on their hands.

I doubt the killer in this case was a Republican.

Any 2A nut job preventing gun control has blood on their hands. Primarily Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The killer in this case was all Republicans:
An untreated low income kid with mental health issues waiting until his 18 birthday to go out and buy weapons that Republicans don't want to have a waiting period for or evaluation to own.

Yup. Put it right in his hands.

Nice job, chumps.