Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan has apparently written a children's book. The writing is atrociously bad..

Looking out at My love
And our beautiful boy
Here at the window
I'll cry tears of great joy.

..From here you will rest
See the growth of our boy.

Ok.....

I will say, what little was released shows a great predilection for control and planning. Here you will cry. And here you will rest. See I thought of everything.

Is this excerpt for real? It’s so bad it’s cringeworthy.

They are really living up to their moniker of "Ginge and Cringe" aren't they?

Every breath you take, every move you make, I’ll be watching you

+1

[Anonymous]

If the Queen were smart, she would've allowed the use of the name. What damage would come from granting them their independence and them benefiting vicariously through the philanthropic work? The organization's name would have always brought to mind the UK. Instead, Archewell stands alone as a global independent presence, that is doing great work and forming fantastic partnerships. As usual, the BRF got it wrong.

I mean, if you say so.....,"global independent presence...."

I just think of orthotics. Arch well, my friends!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the BRF is so bad why does Meghan continue to use the royal title? Why is she allowed to? The titles should have ended when their other ties were cut.

Right? No title nothing to trade on. What happened to "Just Harry"? That was the first thing they did was try to trademark "Sussex Royal" until the Queen intervened.

If the Queen were smart, she would've allowed the use of the name. What damage would come from granting them their independence and them benefiting vicariously through the philanthropic work? The organization's name would have always brought to mind the UK. Instead, Archewell stands alone as a global independent presence, that is doing great work and forming fantastic partnerships. As usual, the BRF got it wrong.

Prince "Just Harry" is doing that anyway. So the queen wins.

When he got a standing ovation at the concert, they weren't applauding Megxit and freedom, they were applauding a British prince.

Or a British rebel on American soil. Get real. We think William sucks lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If the Queen were smart, she would've allowed the use of the name. What damage would come from granting them their independence and them benefiting vicariously through the philanthropic work? The organization's name would have always brought to mind the UK. Instead, Archewell stands alone as a global independent presence, that is doing great work and forming fantastic partnerships. As usual, the BRF got it wrong.

I mean, if you say so.....,"global independent presence...."

I just think of orthotics. Arch well, my friends!!

Probably cause you're old. It's okay. Aging is a beautiful thing. May the mind grow and mature, as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan has apparently written a children's book. The writing is atrociously bad..

Looking out at My love
And our beautiful boy
Here at the window
I'll cry tears of great joy.

..From here you will rest
See the growth of our boy.

Ok.....

I will say, what little was released shows a great predilection for control and planning. Here you will cry. And here you will rest. See I thought of everything.

Is this excerpt for real? It’s so bad it’s cringeworthy.

They are really living up to their moniker of "Ginge and Cringe" aren't they?

Every breath you take, every move you make, I’ll be watching you

+1

+2 Not only is the quality dreadful the title screams "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex." Just a humble girl living in a 15mil mansion who wants to do no work for the BRF but sure wants the leverage that title!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If the Queen were smart, she would've allowed the use of the name. What damage would come from granting them their independence and them benefiting vicariously through the philanthropic work? The organization's name would have always brought to mind the UK. Instead, Archewell stands alone as a global independent presence, that is doing great work and forming fantastic partnerships. As usual, the BRF got it wrong.

I mean, if you say so.....,"global independent presence...."

I just think of orthotics. Arch well, my friends!!
HAHAHAHA! That's great! Thanks for the laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If the Queen were smart, she would've allowed the use of the name. What damage would come from granting them their independence and them benefiting vicariously through the philanthropic work? The organization's name would have always brought to mind the UK. Instead, Archewell stands alone as a global independent presence, that is doing great work and forming fantastic partnerships. As usual, the BRF got it wrong.

I mean, if you say so.....,"global independent presence...."

I just think of orthotics. Arch well, my friends!!

The damage would come from them doing questionable things with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If the Queen were smart, she would've allowed the use of the name. What damage would come from granting them their independence and them benefiting vicariously through the philanthropic work? The organization's name would have always brought to mind the UK. Instead, Archewell stands alone as a global independent presence, that is doing great work and forming fantastic partnerships. As usual, the BRF got it wrong.

I mean, if you say so.....,"global independent presence...."

I just think of orthotics. Arch well, my friends!!

The damage would come from them doing questionable things with it.

In January 2020, they promised to always act appropriately on the BRF's behalf as they worked out the details of their leaving.

Then the Oprah interview happened...

[Anonymous]

So this book is going to enrich their bank account? I was wondering how they were paying for all their security/ house / cars/ nannies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry could care less about the applause from all the celebrity hanger-ins (though Megan has stars in her eyes). The soldiers and the British are his true crowd and the only applause that matters. I bet he misses it keenly.

Oh, I bet that getting applause felt a lot nicer than the boos he was getting back in England before he left. Even if the applause is from American health care workers instead of British soldiers and vets.

You think he knows he's in the wrong place? I don't think he's figured that out. For his sake, it might be best if he never does.

Was he getting boos back in England before he left?

And who's to say he's in the wrong place? Why are you the arbiter of that?

There are no incidents of Harry getting booed in England.

However there are hundreds of tabloid stories about the “concern” that if he returns he will get booed from the crowds. The stories are written to make it seem as if it’s something that’s actually happening, but if you read closely it’s all about “the possibility” that it could happen. The royal Rota just can’t let it go.

The other rumor they’re encouraging is that Harry didn’t actually get a standing ovation at the VaxLive concert—despite video evidence to the contrary. There are conspiracy theories that there were no seats so everyone was standing anyways. Photos easily show this is false. Then they’re trying to claim that the audience was paid to stand and cheer. It’s really amazing how far they’re willing to go to try to control the narrative that Harry is not popular.

Sorry that reality isn't as neat as you want it to be. Before H&M left the UK, they were getting booed. Poor Harry. It must have been awful.

Would he be booed if he returned? I have no idea. Nor do I spend a lot of time listening to internet rumors speculating about it.

You literally started a post about those rumors...

Again, I’m sorry if you’re not able to read the articles, they really are written to mislead and it’s working! The only event he attended in England in the past year is his grandfather’s funeral. People were NOT booing, but to be fair the public also wasn’t invited.

Lol, I'm glad people are calling out the delusional Meghan/Harry bashers who apparently can't even keep up with their own illogic and mistruths.

Yes, in 2019 and early 2020, H&M were booed in England

Now Harry got a standing ovation in the US. That's not a mistruth.

What's the source for them getting booed? Is there footage?

And you said yourself that you don't "spend a lot of time listening to internet rumors speculating about it" while doing exactly that. So you come off as a bit of a buffoon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wty_W4YuMNY
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/471822498461533418/?autologin=true
https://www.ibtimes.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-reportedly-booed-event-duchess-blamed-2754574

Mingled in with applause, were noticeable boos at the two above referenced events

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the BRF is so bad why does Meghan continue to use the royal title? Why is she allowed to? The titles should have ended when their other ties were cut.

Right? No title nothing to trade on. What happened to "Just Harry"? That was the first thing they did was try to trademark "Sussex Royal" until the Queen intervened.

If the Queen were smart, she would've allowed the use of the name. What damage would come from granting them their independence and them benefiting vicariously through the philanthropic work? The organization's name would have always brought to mind the UK. Instead, Archewell stands alone as a global independent presence, that is doing great work and forming fantastic partnerships. As usual, the BRF got it wrong.

Prince "Just Harry" is doing that anyway. So the queen wins.

When he got a standing ovation at the concert, they weren't applauding Megxit and freedom, they were applauding a British prince.

Or a British rebel on American soil. Get real. We think William sucks lol

You get real. Without the BRF, there is no Harry. I mean Harry's entire claim to fame is that he survived labor and delivery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry could care less about the applause from all the celebrity hanger-ins (though Megan has stars in her eyes). The soldiers and the British are his true crowd and the only applause that matters. I bet he misses it keenly.

Oh, I bet that getting applause felt a lot nicer than the boos he was getting back in England before he left. Even if the applause is from American health care workers instead of British soldiers and vets.

You think he knows he's in the wrong place? I don't think he's figured that out. For his sake, it might be best if he never does.

Was he getting boos back in England before he left?

And who's to say he's in the wrong place? Why are you the arbiter of that?

There are no incidents of Harry getting booed in England.

However there are hundreds of tabloid stories about the “concern” that if he returns he will get booed from the crowds. The stories are written to make it seem as if it’s something that’s actually happening, but if you read closely it’s all about “the possibility” that it could happen. The royal Rota just can’t let it go.

The other rumor they’re encouraging is that Harry didn’t actually get a standing ovation at the VaxLive concert—despite video evidence to the contrary. There are conspiracy theories that there were no seats so everyone was standing anyways. Photos easily show this is false. Then they’re trying to claim that the audience was paid to stand and cheer. It’s really amazing how far they’re willing to go to try to control the narrative that Harry is not popular.

Sorry that reality isn't as neat as you want it to be. Before H&M left the UK, they were getting booed. Poor Harry. It must have been awful.

Would he be booed if he returned? I have no idea. Nor do I spend a lot of time listening to internet rumors speculating about it.

You literally started a post about those rumors...

Again, I’m sorry if you’re not able to read the articles, they really are written to mislead and it’s working! The only event he attended in England in the past year is his grandfather’s funeral. People were NOT booing, but to be fair the public also wasn’t invited.

Lol, I'm glad people are calling out the delusional Meghan/Harry bashers who apparently can't even keep up with their own illogic and mistruths.

Yes, in 2019 and early 2020, H&M were booed in England

Now Harry got a standing ovation in the US. That's not a mistruth.

What's the source for them getting booed? Is there footage?

And you said yourself that you don't "spend a lot of time listening to internet rumors speculating about it" while doing exactly that. So you come off as a bit of a buffoon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wty_W4YuMNY
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/471822498461533418/?autologin=true
https://www.ibtimes.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-reportedly-booed-event-duchess-blamed-2754574

Mingled in with applause, were noticeable boos at the two above referenced events

Terrible how they've been treated by the British public and press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So this book is going to enrich their bank account? I was wondering how they were paying for all their security/ house / cars/ nannies.

Nah. Funding .. I mean Finding Freedom is already in the bargain .99 bin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So this book is going to enrich their bank account? I was wondering how they were paying for all their security/ house / cars/ nannies.

They’re paying for their lifestyle from Harry’s salary at a tech start-up —yes, he has a real job! They also have a multi-year 200 million deal with Netflix and a 3 year 75 million deal with Spotify.

The book is a vanity project, or rather something she’s doing for fun.

[Anonymous]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9542805/PIERS-MORGAN-Meghan-Markle-preach-father-child-relationships.html

I have no words. Mostly because the author took them right from this thread.