Russians Compromising Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't really about the election hacking, but it is about Putin and Trump, in The Economist:

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21716609-it-terrible-idea-donald-trump-seeks-grand-bargain-vladimir-putin

"The art of the deal meets the tsar of the steal"

This article has a date of "Feb 11th 2017". What's up?

?? The issue probably comes out in print on that date.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't really about the election hacking, but it is about Putin and Trump, in The Economist:

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21716609-it-terrible-idea-donald-trump-seeks-grand-bargain-vladimir-putin

"The art of the deal meets the tsar of the steal"

This article has a date of "Feb 11th 2017". What's up?

?? The issue probably comes out in print on that date.

Yes, next week's issue. The Economist still goes by the print edition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't really about the election hacking, but it is about Putin and Trump, in The Economist:

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21716609-it-terrible-idea-donald-trump-seeks-grand-bargain-vladimir-putin

"The art of the deal meets the tsar of the steal"

This article has a date of "Feb 11th 2017". What's up?

?? The issue probably comes out in print on that date.

Ha, thanks for the response. I checked my PC, and phone dates. I even checked the date in Russia!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't really about the election hacking, but it is about Putin and Trump, in The Economist:

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21716609-it-terrible-idea-donald-trump-seeks-grand-bargain-vladimir-putin

"The art of the deal meets the tsar of the steal"

This article has a date of "Feb 11th 2017". What's up?

?? The issue probably comes out in print on that date.

Ha, thanks for the response. I checked my PC, and phone dates. I even checked the date in Russia!

Did you think they still use the Julian Calendar?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't really about the election hacking, but it is about Putin and Trump, in The Economist:

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21716609-it-terrible-idea-donald-trump-seeks-grand-bargain-vladimir-putin

"The art of the deal meets the tsar of the steal"

This article has a date of "Feb 11th 2017". What's up?

?? The issue probably comes out in print on that date.

The article treats Trump as if he has some sort of rational plan or reason for aligning himself with Putin.

Obviously, from what we know of Trump, he is motivated by greed and self-aggrandizement and nothing else. Putin has some sort of hold over Trump, whether it's embarrassing videos or a financial carrot in the form of Rosneft shares.

It's impossible that Trump admires Putin. He admires no one except himself. He has no friends, and he likely doesn't even love his own children.

Why hasn't the Economist or a group of investigative journalists dug out the truth behind the Putin-Trump bromance? Where there's smoke, there's fire....

[Anonymous]

If we're going to build up the "Russia Controls Trump" conspiracy AGAIN, would you please provide some evidence this time? Russia/Trump is proving to be birtherism 2.0!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:


If we're going to build up the "Russia Controls Trump" conspiracy AGAIN, would you please provide some evidence this time? Russia/Trump is proving to be birtherism 2.0!

If this is a serious question then why not start with, Why does Donald deny knowing Putin, ever having met him today, and yet on video over the past several years, there are clips of him talking about their relationship?

Then from there, ask about the business relationships between Trump and the various banks and oligarchs in Russia. His son was quoted as saying they had a disproportionate amount of money coming in from Russia. A lot of this through investments and condo sales at inflated prices. One theory is that Trump was laundering money, but either way, we need an understanding of what Trump owes these people.

Then, ask about the so-called Russian hacking and the relationship with Manafort, Stone and Page; and to a similar degree the relationship Tillerson and Flynn have with Russia given their highly placed status in the Administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If we're going to build up the "Russia Controls Trump" conspiracy AGAIN, would you please provide some evidence this time? Russia/Trump is proving to be birtherism 2.0!

How many people were killed or charged with crimes in Kenia a month after the search for "the real birth certificate" began? Or years since?

[Anonymous]

Kenya, of course

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


If we're going to build up the "Russia Controls Trump" conspiracy AGAIN, would you please provide some evidence this time? Russia/Trump is proving to be birtherism 2.0!

If this is a serious question then why not start with, Why does Donald deny knowing Putin, ever having met him today, and yet on video over the past several years, there are clips of him talking about their relationship?

Then from there, ask about the business relationships between Trump and the various banks and oligarchs in Russia. His son was quoted as saying they had a disproportionate amount of money coming in from Russia. A lot of this through investments and condo sales at inflated prices. One theory is that Trump was laundering money, but either way, we need an understanding of what Trump owes these people.

Then, ask about the so-called Russian hacking and the relationship with Manafort, Stone and Page; and to a similar degree the relationship Tillerson and Flynn have with Russia given their highly placed status in the Administration.

Also ask why trump has advocated pro-Russia policies Ukraine, sanctions.

Ask why Putin rubbed out a whole bunch of people associated with putting trump into office. Ask why trump insists on moral parity between Putin's murders and actions of US leaders.

[Anonymous]

Tip of the iceberg

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_usrussia-%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.fc6bb0c33677

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tip of the iceberg

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_usrussia-%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.fc6bb0c33677

WOW!

The Russia - Trump connection needs to come back to front pages. You know there's something seedy going on there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tip of the iceberg

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_usrussia-%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.fc6bb0c33677

Will this be considered treasonous...

[Anonymous]

" Um I forgot we discussed the sanctions."

If so, this man should not be anywhere near any national security issue.

He just has been busted with a surveillance audio or such.

And Pence should go down with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tip of the iceberg

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_usrussia-%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.fc6bb0c33677

WOW!

The Russia - Trump connection needs to come back to front pages. You know there's something seedy going on there.

Country over party. This looks like treason.