FCV finds its way into ECNL. Loudoun’s days coming to an end

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

No, they will not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

No other way to give 20+ A team players enough game time.

There are no 20+ FCV teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

DA doesn’t exist. Better to play the top ECNLr teams right down the street than away games in Delaware. The different in competition isn’t nearly enough to justify the drive - although maybe we will get used to when we start driving to Springfield and Annandale for practices all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

DA doesn’t exist. Better to play the top ECNLr teams right down the street than away games in Delaware. The different in competition isn’t nearly enough to justify the drive - although maybe we will get used to when we start driving to Springfield and Annandale for practices all the time.

B teams are not “top teams” lol!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

No other way to give 20+ A team players enough game time.

There are no 20+ FCV teams.

Sure there are. 07s, for example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

No other way to give 20+ A team players enough game time.

There are no 20+ FCV teams.

Sure there are. 07s, for example.

And kids get dialed and play in EDP or whatever trash FCVs trash B teams play in. ECNL-R is a B team League by design and would be a step down for any A team player at FCV.

[Anonymous]

Guarantee you FCV plays its GA players in ECNL-R games. Will be told it’s about their “development.”

Probably only in their matches against LS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guarantee you FCV plays its GA players in ECNL-R games. Will be told it’s about their “development.”

Probably only in their matches against LS

I guarantee you it will not happen on a large scale because they don’t care about their B teams. They never have and they never will. You’ve created quite a fantasy.

Why don’t you just take your kid to a current ECNL team and cut out the middleman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

No other way to give 20+ A team players enough game time.

There are no 20+ FCV teams.

I read 20+ FCV A team players not teams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^And that is exactly what FCV is positioning itself to do. VIVA is in Annandale near the St. James. Get rid of underperforming BRYC and it’s a done deal.

Bryc leaving doesn’t give ECNL to FCV….do you understand?

It’s a geographical think. FCV must leave Loudoun and move to BRYC territory to get it. Hopefully you understand the reason…..

And that’s a big IF….I see Skyline FC taking over any new spots.

You heard it here first.

Sad little person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ecnl-r > GAL

GA is not as good as ECNL but stop with this silliness of ECNL-R being a top league in any way shape or form. As ECNL and GA both continue to expand it is simply a race to the bottom.

I disagree. The mid Atlantic ecnl-r teams would do well in the GAL mid Atlantic.

Well arlington was average to above average in GA but you think their 2nd team would do well in Ga? Does not make sense unless you think there is little difference between their teams?

No. I think ecnl-r teams would do well in the GAL. Nothing about 2nd teams

You people are missing the point of ECNL-r. It doesn’t matter which league has better teams. They serve different purposes. ECNL and GAL are national leagues for players interested in getting maximum college exposure, showcases, etc. ECNL-r players are generally done playing after high school. Just because a player is in ECNL-R doesn’t mean they are inferior. Just that they are not likely to play in college.

I’m just saying that the GAL clubs are weak and on the same level as ECNL-R clubs. GAL may be a national league but everyone knows how weak most of the clubs are in GAL. The local ECNL-R clubs are just as good or better than most GAL clubs. Top ECNL-R girls will be recruited at the same level as GAL players. Don’t be naive to thinking this is a pathway to ECNL for FCV, which frankly these days is a glorified CCL club looking for a way to transition to Springfield

This is a pathway. Jealousy is unbecoming.

LOL ECNLr is for the second teams. It is not a pathway to anything. You really think ECNL will spend any time or resources pushing ECNLr to colleges?I got a bridge to sell you. ECNL’s path way in ECNL. GA will be better vs ECNLr any day of the week for anyone interested in college.

One jealous mom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^And that is exactly what FCV is positioning itself to do. VIVA is in Annandale near the St. James. Get rid of underperforming BRYC and it’s a done deal.

Bryc leaving doesn’t give ECNL to FCV….do you understand?

It’s a geographical think. FCV must leave Loudoun and move to BRYC territory to get it. Hopefully you understand the reason…..

And that’s a big IF….I see Skyline FC taking over any new spots.

You heard it here first.

Sad little person.

I’m curious if you are a delusional FCV parent who wants ECNL or a Villarreal parent who thinks the FCV name is gonna ride in like a white horse and get your girl into ECNL.

Why don’t you just take your kid to a ECNL team/club now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ecnl-r > GAL

GA is not as good as ECNL but stop with this silliness of ECNL-R being a top league in any way shape or form. As ECNL and GA both continue to expand it is simply a race to the bottom.

I disagree. The mid Atlantic ecnl-r teams would do well in the GAL mid Atlantic.

Well arlington was average to above average in GA but you think their 2nd team would do well in Ga? Does not make sense unless you think there is little difference between their teams?

No. I think ecnl-r teams would do well in the GAL. Nothing about 2nd teams

You people are missing the point of ECNL-r. It doesn’t matter which league has better teams. They serve different purposes. ECNL and GAL are national leagues for players interested in getting maximum college exposure, showcases, etc. ECNL-r players are generally done playing after high school. Just because a player is in ECNL-R doesn’t mean they are inferior. Just that they are not likely to play in college.

I’m just saying that the GAL clubs are weak and on the same level as ECNL-R clubs. GAL may be a national league but everyone knows how weak most of the clubs are in GAL. The local ECNL-R clubs are just as good or better than most GAL clubs. Top ECNL-R girls will be recruited at the same level as GAL players. Don’t be naive to thinking this is a pathway to ECNL for FCV, which frankly these days is a glorified CCL club looking for a way to transition to Springfield

This is a pathway. Jealousy is unbecoming.

LOL ECNLr is for the second teams. It is not a pathway to anything. You really think ECNL will spend any time or resources pushing ECNLr to colleges?I got a bridge to sell you. ECNL’s path way in ECNL. GA will be better vs ECNLr any day of the week for anyone interested in college.

One jealous mom.

Seriously, what is there to be jealous of? Making a ECNL clubs B team or some small clubs A team? Are we all supposed to be jealous of ECNL’s B league?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

DA doesn’t exist. Better to play the top ECNLr teams right down the street than away games in Delaware. The different in competition isn’t nearly enough to justify the drive - although maybe we will get used to when we start driving to Springfield and Annandale for practices all the time.

B teams are not “top teams” lol!!!!

Keep on slurping that rosé!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pathing that wasn't working when FCV and BRYC attempted a back door partnership. Starting in ECNL - R is requisite to show readiness to advance. Similar to the Cleveland Force starting ECNL R and now going ECNL. Give the pathing 2-3 years and they may very well be ECNL

That would require FCVs B teams to dominate ECNL-R.

That’s not going to happen.

Incorrect. A team can play on B - they will have to do this to get their heavy rosters playing time. Some teams have 22+

So the DA-rostered players will be playing games against NPL teams?

DA doesn’t exist. Better to play the top ECNLr teams right down the street than away games in Delaware. The different in competition isn’t nearly enough to justify the drive - although maybe we will get used to when we start driving to Springfield and Annandale for practices all the time.

B teams are not “top teams” lol!!!!

Keep on slurping that rosé!

Your bit is getting stale