Anonymous wrote:I’m realizing this is a futile exercise. It’s impossible to know what you would have done in the same situation because as clearly as I try to describe it, you were not there. So I’m asking you to just assume you felt what I felt, and ask what you have done given that. But again, you’re getting stuck on the fact that you think you wouldn’t have felt what I felt. I get it- I could be some quack who is suspicious of every stranger, you don’t know me. You don’t know my DH. Or I could be a normal mom who has always had pretty good instincts, and decided to follow her gut in this case. Point is, you guys don’t know either way, so you are just getting stuck on that instead of offering feedback that I can actually use.
I do appreciate some of the earlier responses which were actually helpful. So thank you to those Pp’s.
Oh my goodness OP. It's not that we don't understand the scenario. It's that the nearly unanimous decision is that we all would have GONE WITH ALL THREE KIDS. The first time. The second time. The third time. If we thought it was suspicious - go with the kids. If we didn't think it was suspicious - still go with the kids. It's not complicated. Stay with the kids, go see the new things. And kept going with the kids unless it was time to leave or the big kid tried to take your kids to a waiting van or a busy highway or something.
|