Lordy... they released the tapes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this even a surprise or newsworthy in any way? Did anyone really believe that Donald Trump, who is on his third marriage and spent most of the late 1990s and early 2000s on the Howard Stern show, did not engage in this sort of activity? Of course he did! And he paid the women to keep quiet. Who cares where the money came from? He self funded his entire campaign and is working for free.

um, most people care where the money came from if it were obtained fraudulently. and hello, GOP, the party of "family values"

Most true Republicans find Trump morally reprehensible, but see him as a vessel to get conservative Supreme Court justices. He has delivered on that promise, and will continue to do so in the future, so they will support him. It’s that simple.

Never make a deal with the devil.

Why not? It worked.

The irony of all of this is that they care so much about SC appointments but obviously care very little about the rule of law. Here is DJT on tape in the act of committing felonies, yet they nary register a peep.

The law is dead,
and no one cares.
If there is a hell,
I'll you there.

They are actively eroding the power of the law, while simultaneously celebrating SC appointments. Bizarro world.

[Anonymous]

Question from this morning's tweetstorm.

@realDonaldTrump
What kind of a lawyer would tape a client? So sad! Is this a first, never heard of it before? Why was the tape so abruptly terminated (cut) while I was presumably saying positive things? I hear there are other clients and many reporters that are taped - can this be so? Too bad!
Answer: the only kind of lawyer willing to work for a felon who doesn't pay his lawyers.

[Anonymous]

There is a clip of Hannity on Fox looking pretty darn shaken up when discussing Cohen taping his clients...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question from this morning's tweetstorm.

@realDonaldTrump
What kind of a lawyer would tape a client? So sad! Is this a first, never heard of it before? Why was the tape so abruptly terminated (cut) while I was presumably saying positive things? I hear there are other clients and many reporters that are taped - can this be so? Too bad!
Answer: the only kind of lawyer willing to work for a felon who doesn't pay his lawyers.

Trump authorized (or chose not to fight) the release of this tape. Either he's forgotten or he's a really good actor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a clip of Hannity on Fox looking pretty darn shaken up when discussing Cohen taping his clients...

hahahaha

oh, poor hannity. cohen is going to take your fat butt down, too. boo hoo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question from this morning's tweetstorm.

@realDonaldTrump
What kind of a lawyer would tape a client? So sad! Is this a first, never heard of it before? Why was the tape so abruptly terminated (cut) while I was presumably saying positive things? I hear there are other clients and many reporters that are taped - can this be so? Too bad!
Answer: the only kind of lawyer willing to work for a felon who doesn't pay his lawyers.

Trump authorized (or chose not to fight) the release of this tape. Either he's forgotten or he's a really good actor.

i think he is both senile and crazy. he honestly doesn't know minute to minute what he has and hasn't done.

[Anonymous]

Those of you trying to claim that the National Enquirer is not a legitimate newspaper need to just STFU, okay?

It's a legitimate, trustworthy newspaper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question from this morning's tweetstorm.

@realDonaldTrump
What kind of a lawyer would tape a client? So sad! Is this a first, never heard of it before? Why was the tape so abruptly terminated (cut) while I was presumably saying positive things? I hear there are other clients and many reporters that are taped - can this be so? Too bad!
Answer: the only kind of lawyer willing to work for a felon who doesn't pay his lawyers.

sounds like he is admitting it IS him on the tapes, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question from this morning's tweetstorm.

@realDonaldTrump
What kind of a lawyer would tape a client? So sad! Is this a first, never heard of it before? Why was the tape so abruptly terminated (cut) while I was presumably saying positive things? I hear there are other clients and many reporters that are taped - can this be so? Too bad!
Answer: the only kind of lawyer willing to work for a felon who doesn't pay his lawyers.

Trump authorized (or chose not to fight) the release of this tape. Either he's forgotten or he's a really good actor.

How would he fight it? It was already deemed not privileged and in New York you only need the consent of one of the parties to be recorded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trying to claim that the National Enquirer is not a legitimate newspaper need to just STFU, okay?

It's a legitimate, trustworthy newspaper.

Is this trump parody? Did he tweet this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trying to claim that the National Enquirer is not a legitimate newspaper need to just STFU, okay?

It's a legitimate, trustworthy newspaper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pam Bondi, FL AG, received 25K in political donations from Trump Org, as a "charitable donation".

Mere days after that, Pam Bondi decided not to investigate scandal-/scam-plagued Trump University.

Refresh your memory here. Also from September, same timing as the tape.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/15/us/politics/pam-bondi-donald-trump-foundation.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question from this morning's tweetstorm.

@realDonaldTrump
What kind of a lawyer would tape a client? So sad! Is this a first, never heard of it before? Why was the tape so abruptly terminated (cut) while I was presumably saying positive things? I hear there are other clients and many reporters that are taped - can this be so? Too bad!
Answer: the only kind of lawyer willing to work for a felon who doesn't pay his lawyers.

Trump authorized (or chose not to fight) the release of this tape. Either he's forgotten or he's a really good actor.

How would he fight it? It was already deemed not privileged and in New York you only need the consent of one of the parties to be recorded.

Attorney client privilege would prevent the release of the tape, unless the attorney or client is discussing a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those of you trying to claim that the National Enquirer is not a legitimate newspaper need to just STFU, okay?

It's a legitimate, trustworthy newspaper.

Ok " Bat Boy"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question from this morning's tweetstorm.

@realDonaldTrump
What kind of a lawyer would tape a client? So sad! Is this a first, never heard of it before? Why was the tape so abruptly terminated (cut) while I was presumably saying positive things? I hear there are other clients and many reporters that are taped - can this be so? Too bad!
Answer: the only kind of lawyer willing to work for a felon who doesn't pay his lawyers.

Trump authorized (or chose not to fight) the release of this tape. Either he's forgotten or he's a really good actor.

How would he fight it? It was already deemed not privileged and in New York you only need the consent of one of the parties to be recorded.

Attorney client privilege would prevent the release of the tape, unless the attorney or client is discussing a crime.

I don't get why Trump's lawyers would waive privilege to the tapes. What are they trying to do here?

Cohen’s lawyer, Lanny Davis, said in a tweet that Trump and his legal team had waived the privilege to the tapes. One of Trump’s lawyers, Rudy Giuliani, confirmed the waiver in an interview with Reuters.