5th grade -Capitol Hill

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ok people here is what you do

1. Go from 3 to 2 middle schools (Elliot Hine should close it's tiny)
2. Give both of the middle schools all the extra programming and honors/tracking that current Stuart Hobson
3. Have the dividing line be East or West of say Sixth Street whatever is the midpoint of Ward 6 (enough of the weird attendance zones)

Done

+1,000.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are a year away from the possible 5th grade move to middle, but I at this point I can't imagine putting my kid on a city bus every day to get to/from school. I would personally be able to swing the drive, but is it out of the question for DC to provide school busses? I think our kids deserve that. They are exposed to A LOT on mass transit, not to mention the safety issues of not being guaranteed a seat, etc. Especially in situations like Brent where the IB elementary and IB middle schools are so far apart. Not to offer school busses for the DCPS kids is really unacceptable.

How do you think kids got to school EVERY day across DC? When Rhee closed all of the schools were you banging on the table wondering how these kids will get to school each day? But your precious child who lives on Cap Hill deserves a school bus? Look around and see how the rest of DC lives.

Is there a reason to be so nasty? I think EVERYONES precious child should have a school bus if they are not in walking distance from school. I walk my kids to my neighborhood school and have been doing that since my rising 4th grader was 3. When we need to go to a school further away, they will not be on a city bus. I have the flexibility to make this happen since it bothers me (fine if it does not bother you). Not everyone has a choice, which is my point. Everyone should be able to choose not to send their 9 year old to school on dc public transit. No clue why you would think I thought this should be for my child only. Good lord.

Brent and Jefferson are 1.4 miles apart. Honestly, for healthy middle schoolers that IS walking distance. Kids with disabilities, of course, should have transportation built into their IEPs as needed. The other kids can walk, take the circulator directly between the schools, or use the metro for free.

1.4 miles equals a 30 minute walk (for an adult) you think it's cool for a 10 year old to walk 30 minutes to school twice a a day in the middle of a not so safe city? Get a grip.

UM, the farthest a kid should need to walk would actually be 0.7 miles, which is halfway between the two schools. And yes, a 10 year old should be expected to able to do a 15 minute walk twice a day.

What? People zoned for Brent don't live halfway between Brent and JA. Halfway between Brent and JA is mostly zoned for Van Ness... Kids who live at 7th and Independence, however, are zoned for JA. So they're more than 2 miles from JA. I don't think you understand how zoning works.

I don’t think that person understands how distance works.

Yes, they don't understand distance. I am in bound for Brent and if I let my kids walk it would be a 35 minute walk. Absurd.

Most kids can walk 35 minutes. Kids who play soccer, or dance, or do any other kind of sport/physical activity could handle that. When factoring in the walk to the station and the wait for the train, it's probably the same door-to-door whether you walk or metro. Some days the weather is gross and it's more pleasant to take transit, and maybe your kid can't handle finding his or her way for a mile and a half walk or would dawdle or misbehave or something, but it is not absurd for a middle schooler to walk that far.

Providence and Syracuse schools only give bus passes to kids who live 1.5 miles or more from their middle schools. Minnesota law is districts must provide transportation (school bus, bus pass) for kids who live more than 2 miles away. Lots of school districts expect middle schoolers to walk the equivalent of the Brent zone to Jefferson. Here in DC we're lucky that metro, circulator, and bike lanes provide other options.

Totally over you and your lack of COMMON sense and safety. If you want to compare SE DC to Syracuse and Minnesota Godspeed.

Just ask the mom of the kid who was run over walking to Maury what she thinks about Marylanders running stop signs, racing through the Hill, and ignoring traffic signs. At least once a month I spot a Marylander going the wrong way on a one-way. My kids are thin and athletic, but I will drive them safely to a charter middle school, since it seems DCPS doesn’t care about my kids.

go for it. of course, there are plenty of people injured in car accidents too...and there is a circulator going right from Eastern Market to the Wharf starting this fall...

Feel free to experiment with JA. I have standards for my kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ok people here is what you do

1. Go from 3 to 2 middle schools (Elliot Hine should close it's tiny)
2. Give both of the middle schools all the extra programming and honors/tracking that current Stuart Hobson
3. Have the dividing line be East or West of say Sixth Street whatever is the midpoint of Ward 6 (enough of the weird attendance zones)

Done

Give Stuart Hobson to a charter school- DCI south?

Redo Eliot-Hine as the Capitol Hill Middle School.

Done.

[Anonymous]

These are good ideas. Too bad that they have enjoyed, and will enjoy, precisely zero political support at every level of the city government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These are good ideas. Too bad that they have enjoyed, and will enjoy, precisely zero political support at every level of the city government.

Somehow if you live in Ward 6 you’re responsible for Wards 7 and 8.

Ward 3 residents do whatever the f they want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Brent, Maury and Watkins each lose at least half of their kids in 5th grade, one idea is to move to two middle schools, one for 5th and 6th, the other 7th and 8th and have all Hill schools feed into the two schools (yes, I know, there are more than those three schools), but it strikes me that there is a serious feeder problem with those schools in particular, and also SWS.

But it's an idea with no chance of seeing the light of day ever, mainly due to the political clout Cluster supporters enjoy, and have for decades. That's it, that's all.

This is an idea only bandied about by Hill parents who lack familiarity with the political landscape on the subject.

This is the weirdest myth, or maybe just out of date since SWS spun off. Watkins loses all of its inbound kids by 5th just like the rest of the Hill schools. Not sure why you think we’re running the table.

Come on, it's no secret that the politically connected Cluster leadership has fought every middle school solution that would have worked for the entire Hill community tooth and nail for decades. Individual UMC, IB parents like yourselves may not have done this, but Cluster admins, parent leaders and the Cluster dominated CHPSO as an organization certainly have.

Watkins' student body remains mostly OOB, as does its parent leadership. During the 2013-2014 DCPS boundary and feeder review, the well-organized and resourced Cluster PTA and CHPSO pulled strings on the city council and with Rhee and Henderson to keep Brent, Maury and SWS (in the early stages of the process of breaking off from the Cluster) from gaining by-right access to SH or a new pan Ward 6 middle school entity from being created. They also ensured that Tommy Wells was onboard with a 45 million dollar SH renovation, while Eliot-Hine and Jefferson got zip.

The Cluster's small-minded and selfish advocacy worked like a charm. Weirdest myth, hardly. Huge problem for Hill parents of elementary school age children, absolutely.

This is a false narrative. Watkins was 30% IB last year and continued to trend higher this year (exact figures not yet released). This shows continuing progress. Watkins also doesn't have the IB benefit of ECE where schools like Brent, Maury and Ludlow Taylor's IB % gets inflated. Peabody is by far the largest ECE program and has 75% IB. Combined with Watkins, Peabody serves nearly 700 students (ie Maury and SWS combined). Brent is 2/3 OOB, they don't take new students (OOB or IB) in 5th grade when the class shrinks and its ECE is 100% IB

Huh? Math clearly isn't your strong suit. Brent was 82% in-boundary this past school year - check the DCPS school profile page after it's been updated in the fall for confirmation. PP is correct in nothing that 30% in-boundary means mostly OOB!

so let me get this straight -- your anecdotal report of Brent IB is gospel but anything about Watkins/Cluster's 17-18 numbers are irrelevant and their 16-17 numbers are gospel? Got it

Again -- ECE impact is driving your IB numbers ... or maybe reading isn't your thing either. I'll elaborate. In SY 16-17 Brent had 129 ECE students out of 404 -- virtually all of whom were IB but let's conservatively consider Brent's 2016 K as 80% IB -- at 65% IB for the school that means just slightly more than 1/2 of grades 1-5 were IB. Brent had 139 ECE students in SY 17-18 out of 424 total. Even at "82%" (I'll humor you) that's 3/5 IB for grades 1-5.

As of SY 17-18 Watkins served 428 1st through 5th graders vs. 286 at Brent. The total number of IB students served for 1-5 is slightly higher at Brent but not dissimilar when comparing same grade ranges. Watkins IB % isn't propped up by its ECE, which is counted as an entirely separate school in DCPS data.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will DCPS final tackle it’s middle school problem? So many Hill families are leaving their elementary schools for Latin and Basis in 5th grade, the ones that stay are sort of the left behinds, and the kids are now old enough to get that they didn’t win the lottery. All because there isn’t a middle school plan for DC. Is DCPS at all concerned about what this is doing to their middle schools?

1) We do need a middle school plan but I'd happily send my child to Stuart-Hobson. The other middle schools need a lot more TLC than they're getting.

2) Consider that Latin and BASIS are providing high school as well and that may be the real issue.

3) I don't know when they'll tackle it. Do you have a plan for some activism that you would like to share?

It's interesting to see the parents for whom 10% white seems to be a threshold and they feel good about SH but not Jefferson. The schools have pretty equal math scores, with JA outperforming SH with several subgroups, including 6th graders. At SH, only about a third of the NON economically disadvantaged kids are on grade level in math. SH has a median growth percentile below the district average for math too. Clearly both schools have room to improve but it's not clear to me that one is substantially better than the other. Teachers are more likely to leave SH than JA.

I don’t disagree that there’s no racial element to the JA v SH debate, but I do genuinely think part of it is that JA isn’t on the Hill. Parents are Moreno inclined to give SH a chance because it’s convenient and in the part of the neighborhood they walk around. For a Brent kid that lives in the central “old” Hill — say near Seward Square? JA is nowhere near them or near anywhere they’d ever go or near anything they’d ever identify as their neighborhood.

So the neighborhood that is getting Billions of dollars in investment (The Wharf Phase I & II) over the next 5 years isn't a real neighborhood, and isn't a place that people on the hill want to go to?

I mean, I think the Wharf is fun... I would hop on the metro and go there once in awhile. But is it even sort of a little bit part of the Hill? Or anything like the Hill in terms of feel or housing stock or who lives there or anything else? Do they call themselves the Hill or claim they are part of the Hill? Would you walk there from the Hill as part of a normal walk around your neighborhood? No. That's not putting them down or belittling them, it's just the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Brent, Maury and Watkins each lose at least half of their kids in 5th grade, one idea is to move to two middle schools, one for 5th and 6th, the other 7th and 8th and have all Hill schools feed into the two schools (yes, I know, there are more than those three schools), but it strikes me that there is a serious feeder problem with those schools in particular, and also SWS.

But it's an idea with no chance of seeing the light of day ever, mainly due to the political clout Cluster supporters enjoy, and have for decades. That's it, that's all.

This is an idea only bandied about by Hill parents who lack familiarity with the political landscape on the subject.

This is the weirdest myth, or maybe just out of date since SWS spun off. Watkins loses all of its inbound kids by 5th just like the rest of the Hill schools. Not sure why you think we’re running the table.

Come on, it's no secret that the politically connected Cluster leadership has fought every middle school solution that would have worked for the entire Hill community tooth and nail for decades. Individual UMC, IB parents like yourselves may not have done this, but Cluster admins, parent leaders and the Cluster dominated CHPSO as an organization certainly have.

Watkins' student body remains mostly OOB, as does its parent leadership. During the 2013-2014 DCPS boundary and feeder review, the well-organized and resourced Cluster PTA and CHPSO pulled strings on the city council and with Rhee and Henderson to keep Brent, Maury and SWS (in the early stages of the process of breaking off from the Cluster) from gaining by-right access to SH or a new pan Ward 6 middle school entity from being created. They also ensured that Tommy Wells was onboard with a 45 million dollar SH renovation, while Eliot-Hine and Jefferson got zip.

The Cluster's small-minded and selfish advocacy worked like a charm. Weirdest myth, hardly. Huge problem for Hill parents of elementary school age children, absolutely.

This is a false narrative. Watkins was 30% IB last year and continued to trend higher this year (exact figures not yet released). This shows continuing progress. Watkins also doesn't have the IB benefit of ECE where schools like Brent, Maury and Ludlow Taylor's IB % gets inflated. Peabody is by far the largest ECE program and has 75% IB. Combined with Watkins, Peabody serves nearly 700 students (ie Maury and SWS combined). Brent is 2/3 OOB, they don't take new students (OOB or IB) in 5th grade when the class shrinks and its ECE is 100% IB

Huh? Math clearly isn't your strong suit. Brent was 82% in-boundary this past school year - check the DCPS school profile page after it's been updated in the fall for confirmation. PP is correct in nothing that 30% in-boundary means mostly OOB!

so let me get this straight -- your anecdotal report of Brent IB is gospel but anything about Watkins/Cluster's 17-18 numbers are irrelevant and their 16-17 numbers are gospel? Got it

Again -- ECE impact is driving your IB numbers ... or maybe reading isn't your thing either. I'll elaborate. In SY 16-17 Brent had 129 ECE students out of 404 -- virtually all of whom were IB but let's conservatively consider Brent's 2016 K as 80% IB -- at 65% IB for the school that means just slightly more than 1/2 of grades 1-5 were IB. Brent had 139 ECE students in SY 17-18 out of 424 total. Even at "82%" (I'll humor you) that's 3/5 IB for grades 1-5.

As of SY 17-18 Watkins served 428 1st through 5th graders vs. 286 at Brent. The total number of IB students served for 1-5 is slightly higher at Brent but not dissimilar when comparing same grade ranges. Watkins IB % isn't propped up by its ECE, which is counted as an entirely separate school in DCPS data.

I'm not even sure what the point is here anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Brent, Maury and Watkins each lose at least half of their kids in 5th grade, one idea is to move to two middle schools, one for 5th and 6th, the other 7th and 8th and have all Hill schools feed into the two schools (yes, I know, there are more than those three schools), but it strikes me that there is a serious feeder problem with those schools in particular, and also SWS.

But it's an idea with no chance of seeing the light of day ever, mainly due to the political clout Cluster supporters enjoy, and have for decades. That's it, that's all.

This is an idea only bandied about by Hill parents who lack familiarity with the political landscape on the subject.

This is the weirdest myth, or maybe just out of date since SWS spun off. Watkins loses all of its inbound kids by 5th just like the rest of the Hill schools. Not sure why you think we’re running the table.

Come on, it's no secret that the politically connected Cluster leadership has fought every middle school solution that would have worked for the entire Hill community tooth and nail for decades. Individual UMC, IB parents like yourselves may not have done this, but Cluster admins, parent leaders and the Cluster dominated CHPSO as an organization certainly have.

Watkins' student body remains mostly OOB, as does its parent leadership. During the 2013-2014 DCPS boundary and feeder review, the well-organized and resourced Cluster PTA and CHPSO pulled strings on the city council and with Rhee and Henderson to keep Brent, Maury and SWS (in the early stages of the process of breaking off from the Cluster) from gaining by-right access to SH or a new pan Ward 6 middle school entity from being created. They also ensured that Tommy Wells was onboard with a 45 million dollar SH renovation, while Eliot-Hine and Jefferson got zip.

The Cluster's small-minded and selfish advocacy worked like a charm. Weirdest myth, hardly. Huge problem for Hill parents of elementary school age children, absolutely.

This is a false narrative. Watkins was 30% IB last year and continued to trend higher this year (exact figures not yet released). This shows continuing progress. Watkins also doesn't have the IB benefit of ECE where schools like Brent, Maury and Ludlow Taylor's IB % gets inflated. Peabody is by far the largest ECE program and has 75% IB. Combined with Watkins, Peabody serves nearly 700 students (ie Maury and SWS combined). Brent is 2/3 OOB, they don't take new students (OOB or IB) in 5th grade when the class shrinks and its ECE is 100% IB

Huh? Math clearly isn't your strong suit. Brent was 82% in-boundary this past school year - check the DCPS school profile page after it's been updated in the fall for confirmation. PP is correct in nothing that 30% in-boundary means mostly OOB!

so let me get this straight -- your anecdotal report of Brent IB is gospel but anything about Watkins/Cluster's 17-18 numbers are irrelevant and their 16-17 numbers are gospel? Got it

Again -- ECE impact is driving your IB numbers ... or maybe reading isn't your thing either. I'll elaborate. In SY 16-17 Brent had 129 ECE students out of 404 -- virtually all of whom were IB but let's conservatively consider Brent's 2016 K as 80% IB -- at 65% IB for the school that means just slightly more than 1/2 of grades 1-5 were IB. Brent had 139 ECE students in SY 17-18 out of 424 total. Even at "82%" (I'll humor you) that's 3/5 IB for grades 1-5.

As of SY 17-18 Watkins served 428 1st through 5th graders vs. 286 at Brent. The total number of IB students served for 1-5 is slightly higher at Brent but not dissimilar when comparing same grade ranges. Watkins IB % isn't propped up by its ECE, which is counted as an entirely separate school in DCPS data.

And Watkins IB % is still pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Brent, Maury and Watkins each lose at least half of their kids in 5th grade, one idea is to move to two middle schools, one for 5th and 6th, the other 7th and 8th and have all Hill schools feed into the two schools (yes, I know, there are more than those three schools), but it strikes me that there is a serious feeder problem with those schools in particular, and also SWS.

But it's an idea with no chance of seeing the light of day ever, mainly due to the political clout Cluster supporters enjoy, and have for decades. That's it, that's all.

This is an idea only bandied about by Hill parents who lack familiarity with the political landscape on the subject.

This is the weirdest myth, or maybe just out of date since SWS spun off. Watkins loses all of its inbound kids by 5th just like the rest of the Hill schools. Not sure why you think we’re running the table.

Come on, it's no secret that the politically connected Cluster leadership has fought every middle school solution that would have worked for the entire Hill community tooth and nail for decades. Individual UMC, IB parents like yourselves may not have done this, but Cluster admins, parent leaders and the Cluster dominated CHPSO as an organization certainly have.

Watkins' student body remains mostly OOB, as does its parent leadership. During the 2013-2014 DCPS boundary and feeder review, the well-organized and resourced Cluster PTA and CHPSO pulled strings on the city council and with Rhee and Henderson to keep Brent, Maury and SWS (in the early stages of the process of breaking off from the Cluster) from gaining by-right access to SH or a new pan Ward 6 middle school entity from being created. They also ensured that Tommy Wells was onboard with a 45 million dollar SH renovation, while Eliot-Hine and Jefferson got zip.

The Cluster's small-minded and selfish advocacy worked like a charm. Weirdest myth, hardly. Huge problem for Hill parents of elementary school age children, absolutely.

This is a false narrative. Watkins was 30% IB last year and continued to trend higher this year (exact figures not yet released). This shows continuing progress. Watkins also doesn't have the IB benefit of ECE where schools like Brent, Maury and Ludlow Taylor's IB % gets inflated. Peabody is by far the largest ECE program and has 75% IB. Combined with Watkins, Peabody serves nearly 700 students (ie Maury and SWS combined). Brent is 2/3 OOB, they don't take new students (OOB or IB) in 5th grade when the class shrinks and its ECE is 100% IB

Huh? Math clearly isn't your strong suit. Brent was 82% in-boundary this past school year - check the DCPS school profile page after it's been updated in the fall for confirmation. PP is correct in nothing that 30% in-boundary means mostly OOB!

so let me get this straight -- your anecdotal report of Brent IB is gospel but anything about Watkins/Cluster's 17-18 numbers are irrelevant and their 16-17 numbers are gospel? Got it

Again -- ECE impact is driving your IB numbers ... or maybe reading isn't your thing either. I'll elaborate. In SY 16-17 Brent had 129 ECE students out of 404 -- virtually all of whom were IB but let's conservatively consider Brent's 2016 K as 80% IB -- at 65% IB for the school that means just slightly more than 1/2 of grades 1-5 were IB. Brent had 139 ECE students in SY 17-18 out of 424 total. Even at "82%" (I'll humor you) that's 3/5 IB for grades 1-5.

As of SY 17-18 Watkins served 428 1st through 5th graders vs. 286 at Brent. The total number of IB students served for 1-5 is slightly higher at Brent but not dissimilar when comparing same grade ranges. Watkins IB % isn't propped up by its ECE, which is counted as an entirely separate school in DCPS data.

I'm not even sure what the point is here anymore.

Wait, you are claiming you don't see the difference between Watkins being 30% IB and to use your numbers, Brent being 60% IB over the same grades? Not that any of this really matters.

[Anonymous]

The Brent OOB population includes a lot of Hill families.

The Watkins OOB population has relatively fewer Hill families.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Brent OOB population includes a lot of Hill families.

The Watkins OOB population has relatively fewer Hill families.

Yup. I’m sure it doesn’t matter in terms of DCPS policy, but Brent is close to 100% Hill IB.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Brent, Maury and Watkins each lose at least half of their kids in 5th grade, one idea is to move to two middle schools, one for 5th and 6th, the other 7th and 8th and have all Hill schools feed into the two schools (yes, I know, there are more than those three schools), but it strikes me that there is a serious feeder problem with those schools in particular, and also SWS.

But it's an idea with no chance of seeing the light of day ever, mainly due to the political clout Cluster supporters enjoy, and have for decades. That's it, that's all.

This is an idea only bandied about by Hill parents who lack familiarity with the political landscape on the subject.

This is the weirdest myth, or maybe just out of date since SWS spun off. Watkins loses all of its inbound kids by 5th just like the rest of the Hill schools. Not sure why you think we’re running the table.

Come on, it's no secret that the politically connected Cluster leadership has fought every middle school solution that would have worked for the entire Hill community tooth and nail for decades. Individual UMC, IB parents like yourselves may not have done this, but Cluster admins, parent leaders and the Cluster dominated CHPSO as an organization certainly have.

Watkins' student body remains mostly OOB, as does its parent leadership. During the 2013-2014 DCPS boundary and feeder review, the well-organized and resourced Cluster PTA and CHPSO pulled strings on the city council and with Rhee and Henderson to keep Brent, Maury and SWS (in the early stages of the process of breaking off from the Cluster) from gaining by-right access to SH or a new pan Ward 6 middle school entity from being created. They also ensured that Tommy Wells was onboard with a 45 million dollar SH renovation, while Eliot-Hine and Jefferson got zip.

The Cluster's small-minded and selfish advocacy worked like a charm. Weirdest myth, hardly. Huge problem for Hill parents of elementary school age children, absolutely.

This is a false narrative. Watkins was 30% IB last year and continued to trend higher this year (exact figures not yet released). This shows continuing progress. Watkins also doesn't have the IB benefit of ECE where schools like Brent, Maury and Ludlow Taylor's IB % gets inflated. Peabody is by far the largest ECE program and has 75% IB. Combined with Watkins, Peabody serves nearly 700 students (ie Maury and SWS combined). Brent is 2/3 OOB, they don't take new students (OOB or IB) in 5th grade when the class shrinks and its ECE is 100% IB

Huh? Math clearly isn't your strong suit. Brent was 82% in-boundary this past school year - check the DCPS school profile page after it's been updated in the fall for confirmation. PP is correct in nothing that 30% in-boundary means mostly OOB!

so let me get this straight -- your anecdotal report of Brent IB is gospel but anything about Watkins/Cluster's 17-18 numbers are irrelevant and their 16-17 numbers are gospel? Got it

Again -- ECE impact is driving your IB numbers ... or maybe reading isn't your thing either. I'll elaborate. In SY 16-17 Brent had 129 ECE students out of 404 -- virtually all of whom were IB but let's conservatively consider Brent's 2016 K as 80% IB -- at 65% IB for the school that means just slightly more than 1/2 of grades 1-5 were IB. Brent had 139 ECE students in SY 17-18 out of 424 total. Even at "82%" (I'll humor you) that's 3/5 IB for grades 1-5.

As of SY 17-18 Watkins served 428 1st through 5th graders vs. 286 at Brent. The total number of IB students served for 1-5 is slightly higher at Brent but not dissimilar when comparing same grade ranges. Watkins IB % isn't propped up by its ECE, which is counted as an entirely separate school in DCPS data.

You've got me. I'm curious what your angle is that you are so persistent in re-framing and spinning the data to try to pull Watkins even with Brent. (I'm also curious about your tone and why you didn't own swapping the Brent OOB & IB %s, but we're anonymous so it'll probably remain a mystery)

I don't say it to disparage Watkins -- I do believe it's better than many other schools -- but I haven't met anyone else who considers Watkins and Brent equivalent. (I don't have kids at either)

[Anonymous]

I think this thread has strayed a lot from the subject of 5th grade Capitol Hill.

Back to that subject, a decent number of the departing SWS rising 5th graders are actually inbound for the Cluster—they’re choosing Latin and Basis over SH (not everyone, but quite a lot). So even the most desirable Hill middle school is having trouble attracting families.

While I love SWS, I’m not sure I want my child there for 5th, only because the cohort will be too small (or packed with new kids, many of whom may struggle academically, etc.)

5th grade on the Hill just does not seem viable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this thread has strayed a lot from the subject of 5th grade Capitol Hill.

Back to that subject, a decent number of the departing SWS rising 5th graders are actually inbound for the Cluster—they’re choosing Latin and Basis over SH (not everyone, but quite a lot). So even the most desirable Hill middle school is having trouble attracting families.

While I love SWS, I’m not sure I want my child there for 5th, only because the cohort will be too small (or packed with new kids, many of whom may struggle academically, etc.)

5th grade on the Hill just does not seem viable.

Then do what so many of my neighbors did and cash out and move to Bethesda