Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now (PART TWO)

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anyone see a poster named 'alevelasi' on danni's instagram? (the picture where she announced her separation). i imagine she's been blocked by now haha but her comments are still there.



There were a couple people going in on her. I liked Claudia comment, she told Danni she is full of herself and no one disagreed. Lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Y'all she admitted on Facebook 11 minutes ago that she read all this


Just saw it, yikes. She even used our lingo "trolling" lol.

FYI Danni, no one started a blog about you, it's called a thread



I was thinking the same. It's not a damn blog, you'd think a hard working mama that pumps would know that
Anonymous
Oh FFS..get over yourself, Danni.
Anonymous
Newsflash: you have been on several reality TV shows and are now the most outspoken person on a radio show in a major market. Not everyone is going to like you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why did the Moderator block us from posting on the original thread? Whats the point of blocking it and creating a new one?
Danni is ALWASY late, and she was late today and Kane seemed to be mad at her today.
Im guessing she's on her way out.


Go back to the beginning of this, Jeff clearly states why he did it.


No...he doesn't. Hence why I asked the question troll. It simply says someone mentioned we should start a Danni thread for no good reason. My question is regarding that reason.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:

I made the suggestion for a second thread. There are two reasons that I thought a "part 2" was a good idea:

1) A 200 page thread has over 3,000 posts. So, to view the thread, the forum software has to make a query to the database to retrieve 3,000 some posts. That is a much more intensive database operation then querying for a small number of posts. It takes additional resources to paginate the messages and so on. Individually, those process don't amount to a lot, but spread over lots of users, plus everyone else using DCUM, that is a load on our servers that I'd prefer to avoid if possible (and it is possible by having a second thread).

2) A second thread is easier for people who want to get caught up. Instead of posting "I haven't read the previous 200 pages, but [question that has been asked and answered 100 times already]" users can just read the shorter thread from the beginning. There will still be some covering of old ground, but hopefully less.




Here is why a new thread was started.
I wish it would've remained the one original thread As that second point makes no sense. Now if someone wants to find something discussed they have to jump from thread to thread. Kinda a pain in the ass, but oh well, clearly it wasn't up to us.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Y'all she admitted on Facebook 11 minutes ago that she read all this



I just looked. Funny, she failed to comment on the fact that several on this thread have stopped listening....and she didn't speak on all the fake bits of the show. If she felt the need to post about it she could hav touched on the things at were brought up the most.


This and she needs to take several seats.


She conveniently didn't mention how many listeners actually dislike her and her attitude, and would love love love to see her get fired. Care to address that Danni?
Anonymous
Also, all the comments anti-Danni have been deleted on her post. This woman is truly delusional.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why did the Moderator block us from posting on the original thread? Whats the point of blocking it and creating a new one?
Danni is ALWASY late, and she was late today and Kane seemed to be mad at her today.
Im guessing she's on her way out.


Go back to the beginning of this, Jeff clearly states why he did it.


No...he doesn't. Hence why I asked the question troll. It simply says someone mentioned we should start a Danni thread for no good reason. My question is regarding that reason.


And someone else proved you wrong, nice try.
Anonymous
If I came across a thread dedicated to my employment that included a general consensus on negative things about me I would try to change my ways. It has been mentioned several times that people have stopped listening to the Kane show because of it being fake and Danni being annoying. so hey Danni since you admit you read this how about you work on your personality? Lord knows you take enough time off to "find yourself". How about finding a less aggravating side of your personality? ?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If I came across a thread dedicated to my employment that included a general consensus on negative things about me I would try to change my ways. It has been mentioned several times that people have stopped listening to the Kane show because of it being fake and Danni being annoying. so hey Danni since you admit you read this how about you work on your personality? Lord knows you take enough time off to "find yourself". How about finding a less aggravating side of your personality? ?


I think I love you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why did the mod close the original thread?


Go to page 1, the answer is there.


No it isn't. I checked.
Anonymous
Kane's probably secretly thinking whew, glad they calmed down on my ass!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why did the mod close the original thread?


Go to page 1, the answer is there.


No it isn't. I checked.


Page 2 - oops. The fact remains, you should have read all the pages before asking a question like this.
Anonymous
I don't have Facebook can someone post what she posted??
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: