"God Doesn't Give You More Than You Can Handle"

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Very insulting. As if Judaism is just "Christianity Lite."

You really have a very superficial understanding of the Hebrew Scriptures if you think this, and you sound very stupid when you repeat crap like this. It's exactly why educated people find Christians so eye-rollingly condescending.

And please stop talking about "the curse." No religious context for that whatsoever.

Ancient Judaism came before Christianity.
Modern day Judaism is no ancient Judaism. In a sense both religions have the same mother and are sibling religions. The first persecutors of Christians were Jews who wanted to get rid of the sect. Paul took it to the masses and condemned the practice of converts being made to keep jewish law


Any foundation or citations to this?
In ancient Judaism you had animal sacrifices and priests had to prove they were of the tribe of Levi, you could even have multiple wives. Witches were killed and blasphemy gave you a death sentence
Nobody practices that religion anymore.
Peter was a jewish apostle and he preached to jews only. Saul was a jewish zealot who persecuted Christians and had a reawakening when travelling and was blind for 3 days and then took the gospel to the heathen nations. This was not the only sect that practiced converting the heathen. Paul changed the religion by removing circumsicion and the requirement to follow jewish law. Only later did the non-jews start to run the religion.


I guess I should have been more specific. I'm talking about citations/foundation for your suggestion that Judaism and Christianity "have the same mother and are sibling religions" and that "the first persecutors of Christians were Jews who wanted to get rid of the sect."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Read the New Testament, pp.


Awe the New Testament. It's funny how Christians say refer to the NT when there is something in the original gospels they don't like. Except for that whole gay thing, then they quote Leviticus all day.

The NT is filled with just as much crap as the OT


There is a difference between the Old Testament and the New Testament so it is not a matter of stuff 'they don't like'.
It is a progression -- a lot of the Old Testament is a foreshadowing and foretelling of the coming of Christ.
Christ changed our relationship with God.
He bore our sins, we are no longer under the curse.
And not all Christians think homosexuality is a sin


The next book in the series is the Koran.


Then comes the Book of Mormon....
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Read the New Testament, pp.


Awe the New Testament. It's funny how Christians say refer to the NT when there is something in the original gospels they don't like. Except for that whole gay thing, then they quote Leviticus all day.

The NT is filled with just as much crap as the OT


There is a difference between the Old Testament and the New Testament so it is not a matter of stuff 'they don't like'.
It is a progression -- a lot of the Old Testament is a foreshadowing and foretelling of the coming of Christ.
Christ changed our relationship with God.
He bore our sins, we are no longer under the curse.
And not all Christians think homosexuality is a sin


The next book in the series is the Koran.


Then comes the Book of Mormon....


And after that, "Dianetics".
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it. (New Testament, 1 Corinthians, 1 Corinthians 10)

I think this is a biblical basis for this saying. The idea that struggles imply anything about the sufferer's own inherent strength or weakness is a misinterpretation. Instead, suffering offers a chance to rely on the grace of God. As we draw nearer to Christ, we can be strengthened in Him and borrow His strength to endure our trials with patience and love.

As to the greater discussion, my sect believes that God is NOT omnipotent in the sense of just making up a world and rules for us to follow. He loves us and wants us to be purified and refined that we may dwell with Him and learn about Him, but no unclean thing may dwell with God--we believe that isn't a rule He made up but an irrefutable law inherent in the concept of "goodness" and "God." It is a conundrum any parent can relate to. What He HAS (freedom from sin and misery and sickness and death) He can give us, but what He IS (perfect light and truth) cannot be given, but must be earned. The Garden of Eden offered no sickness or death, no mortal weakness nor temptation. It also offered no freedom to choose. If there is no evil or sin, then there can be no goodness nor righteousness. When Eve partook ofthe Tree of Knowledge, she wasn't punished because God wanted her to suffer for her choice, she was given the inherent consequence of that choice. She introduced into the world the ability to choose, and that means that along with a true understanding of good, we also get evil. The world is no longer static, but mortal. Mortality includes the natural world and all of the sickness, death and decay that are so inherent in that natural order. We are born with a propensity to live as the natural man--selfish, weak, seeking our own gratification and pleasure, but also with The Light of Christ inside each of us and we are given the ability to choose what we become. We can follow Christ and His teachings and our suffering will be sanctified as we are perfected in Him, or we can follow the weakness of men and our suffering will be for nothing.
You don't have to answer but are you Quaker?


No, I belong to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. I am glad that others found the post helpful. I am sorry to hear those who bring such animosity to this discussion. Ultimately, you either believe that there is a path to knowledge and knowing outside of sensory input or rationalization, or you do not.
1 John 4:1
"Believe not every spirit, but try the spirits if they are of God."
The difference between madness and spirituality is in the path trod by a true believer. God does not ask that we follow Him blindly. He asks that we trust and try His word. Each day is an experiment. As I excersize faith (meaning act as though a doctrine were true), I will see that it brings me inner peace and happiness and a deeper spiritual knowledge, or it brings me inner turmoil and fear and a sense of confusion. As we try His word, we either see the result, or we seek after new knowledge. I like the analogy of consuming the dross. It is HARD work to seek His path, but each step draws us more closely until him that we may know Him and in the proccess our sin and weakness is burned away and we are made pure, like unto Him.

Very well put
Anonymous
New testament was completed year 300 ad
koran year 500
Mormon book is less than 200 years old, dianetics secrets are available in wiki leaks.
kama sutra is next in the series
Anonymous
takoma wrote:The Torah, the Gospels, the Koran, they all exist to answer our questions about life.

Early versions of Wikipedia.

So does every other religion.
Belief in mythical deities isn't required to find the answers about your questions in life.
post reply Forum Index » Religion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: