Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
I'm not the PP you're responding to, but: You pay full freight on $30K, but you only work 3 days a week? And your kid may be smart, but kids with serious LDs generally don't get into big 3s. And you need to get over your obsession with public school parents coming here. Many of us have kids in both. And public school parents are needed to correct the BS from posters like you - if you spout BS, somebody on DCUM will correct you. |
No, the "wannabe elitist asshole" is the person who said, and I quote: "I see absolutely nothing positive about a public school education and many, many negatives." That's you, I presume. Today's lesson: act like a jerk in a public place like DCUM, and people will call you a jerk and generally treat you badly. I'm surprised it took you 40+ years to figure this out. I don't care what race you are, jerk = jerk. |
|
Many of you really need to read! I am the one who questioned public school parents coming on to the private school forums to dog out parents who have made the choice to send thier kids to private school. I have not seen such a thing in the public school forum when I used to go on there. I am not an attorney, I work full time and my child is not LD. So pp I do not know what you are talking about! If you actually read my original post you would see that I mentioned parents may have kids at both. That makes sense. What does not make sense is coming to a forum to start shit and try to make yourself feel better by putting down other parents who have made a choice you do not agree with!
|
You need to read. Nobody, I repeat nobody, has criticized parents who choose private school. They have instead criticized certain attitudes, namely the poster who said that public schools have no redeeming qualities, and all good privates are better than all good publics. How could you have missed this distinction? The other mistake you are making is to assume that anybody who disagrees with the snotty private school parent (again: for her reasons, not for private school per se) must have kids only in public school. Wrong. Several posters here have said they have kids in both public and private. This means that (a) we have every right to be on the private school thread, and (b) we are in a better position to talk about the differences than the snotty parent. |
Actually parents who have done their research have a better position to voice an opinion than those that base their opinions on their limited exposure. I was told by the local public that they could not accomodate my child, that a private school (not every private school) could. Many people are faces with this issue. I have talk to administrator, learning specialists, and psycologist before choosing my school. There are many private schools that can handle serious LDs and many privates that can handle mild LDs. Public can handle serious LDs too - but do not have programs nor are they federally mandated to accomodate kids with milld LD's. There is a federal mandate to accomodate GT kids but not mild LD kids. BTW - I said I would prefer a beach house - not you or anybody else. I don't actually want to spend my money on tuition. I - not you - I would prefer a beach house - but I am forced to spend my money on tuition because public school is not set up to meet my childs needs. There are definitely some privates I would never send my kids to because of their learning needs and there are some public schools I would never send my kids to because of their learning needs. Unfortunatelly, when a child is in a school district and are not GT they are left with few choices. Private often fills the nitch that public can fulfill. The truth is that many kids are better in public and others are better in private and if we got rid of one or the other many more kids would fall through the crack. |
| What's so special about the private school forum that any citizen cannot read or post on here? Does this idiot know anything about civil and constitutional rights? Apparently not. A snotty private school wannabe without enough grey matter to fill a thimble. |
So the question could be if you MoCo school is in the green zone why do you send your kids to private. That is a different questions all together. There are many non green people in private. I am not in the green zone but if I was I may need to send my kids to private because some mild LDs do not get IDP and my kids would fall through the cracks as do many smart non GT kids. |
| btw -- now everybody wants to be in the big 3 |
i meant - not everybody wants to be in the big 3 |
| Be my guest. Little 3 if you prefer. |
Nothing at all. It just seems really odd that those parents who have chosen public school exclusively and and who feel public is a waste of money and inferior to public schools lurk around so often in the private school forum. I do not recall seeing a bunch of private school parents posting on the public school forum questioning their education decisions. Oh and the to the poster who told me I need to read you need to reread my first post...I said unless of course you have kids in both. Do your homework before you decide to check me. Thanks. |
| Interesting how public school parnets get so worked up about private school parents saying they think private school is better/best. Really, what do you expect? Private school parents do not seem to care even slightly that public school parents think public school is better/best. They (private school parents) do not go onto the public school boards and try to start arguments and make inflammatory statements about the qualities (or lack there of) of public schools. It just seems that many public school parents (those who come to this Forum) have a bone to pick/chip on their shoulder about private school folks. It really is peculiar. |
| I am a private school parent (and erstwhile student) not afraid to call a spade a spade. I chose private school due to special needs. This does not make this $35,000/yr choice better than the excellent area public schools for high achieving students. Straight from a private school parent. No public school parent hovering here. It really not so peculiar! |
It makes a certain kind of sense at both extremes. If/where the dominant comparative narrative is "public schools suck; I'm glad I was able to keep my kids out of them," then it follows that private school parents who subscribe to it ignore public schools (they've already dismissed them as not worthy of notice if you can buy your way out) and public school parents who resist it are eager to find cases where publics are better than privates. The vast majority of parents probably aren't interested in the debate at this meaningless level (Public vs. Private). They look at their options and pick the particular school (public or private) that works best of their particular kid. Wrt this particular thread, the inquiry was basically "if you had a good public option and still chose private for your DCs, what did you think the advantage of private was?" It wasn't "which is better: public vs. private?" Which is why the public boosterism seems off-point/gratuitous to some people. It's a thread that was deliberately set up to be one-sided and where one-sidedness can be functional. If I don't see the advantage of spending $30,000 a year on education and I listen to others tell me why they did so, I can see whether they considered factors I didn't vs. whether the difference is that they value different things than I do or just have a very different mindset/view of the world. The underlying premise is skeptical and the challenge is "so persuade me." |
Is this true? If so, how does DC get around it? |