New Yorker article about Andrew Tate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this will be another case of "trafficking" like Vince McMahon?

Regardless, anyone who is at least GenX age should know that toxic masculinity was 10x worse back in the day.

I’m not familiar, did Vince McMahon rape, suffocate, and traffic 13-15 year olds to foreign countries?

No, he was basically a sugar daddy and made the mistake of putting his sugar baby on the payroll. But if you read some of the "news" articles, he was accused of all sorts of things, to include trafficking.

Who knows if this article is even accurate?

DP. Did you read it? The reporting is supported by “thousands of private messages, internal documents, sealed prosecutorial files, and court records—as well as scores of interviews with the Tates, their associates, and more than a dozen alleged victims.”

And accuracy is sort of the New Yorker’s thing. Their fact checkers are legendary.

Is this the same New Yorker that is extremely pretentious and well known for its liberal bias?

Maybe work on critical thinking skills and don't blindly accept things at face value.

Lol. This isnt the first article on Andrew Tate. You sound stupid. He came to the US because he was in trouble overseas. He's not a new character. He's been an abusive person with articles and indictments on him for years.

Spoken like a true ignoramus who has no idea how the media operates. I'm sure you were triggered by Diddy or BLM reporting, likely due to the fact that you made no effort to truly understand the issues and context.

I cannot believe people are actually defending one of the worst men on our planet. I dont think you read the article or followed this guy over the course of the two decades he's been notorious for crimes.

Oh , I can.

+1

Millions of Americans worship a white nationalist rapist. Of course they’d defend these POSs.

The Tates are Black. How do you explain that?

Misogyny runs deeper than racism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this will be another case of "trafficking" like Vince McMahon?

Regardless, anyone who is at least GenX age should know that toxic masculinity was 10x worse back in the day.

I’m not familiar, did Vince McMahon rape, suffocate, and traffic 13-15 year olds to foreign countries?

No, he was basically a sugar daddy and made the mistake of putting his sugar baby on the payroll. But if you read some of the "news" articles, he was accused of all sorts of things, to include trafficking.

Who knows if this article is even accurate?

DP. Did you read it? The reporting is supported by “thousands of private messages, internal documents, sealed prosecutorial files, and court records—as well as scores of interviews with the Tates, their associates, and more than a dozen alleged victims.”

And accuracy is sort of the New Yorker’s thing. Their fact checkers are legendary.

Is this the same New Yorker that is extremely pretentious and well known for its liberal bias?

Maybe work on critical thinking skills and don't blindly accept things at face value.

Lol. This isnt the first article on Andrew Tate. You sound stupid. He came to the US because he was in trouble overseas. He's not a new character. He's been an abusive person with articles and indictments on him for years.

Spoken like a true ignoramus who has no idea how the media operates. I'm sure you were triggered by Diddy or BLM reporting, likely due to the fact that you made no effort to truly understand the issues and context.

I cannot believe people are actually defending one of the worst men on our planet. I dont think you read the article or followed this guy over the course of the two decades he's been notorious for crimes.

Oh , I can.

+1

Millions of Americans worship a white nationalist rapist. Of course they’d defend these POSs.

The Tates are Black. How do you explain that?

Willing to bet most of his followers don’t even know. They’re mixed race. One of them could be a Ben Affleck body double.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pandering to leftists is big business.

Reminds me of Fox News viewers thinking they can't go to DC because there's a 90% chance of being car jacked.

There's a sucker born every minute.

The Tates participated in this piece. They allowed the reporter into their space, and she also interviewed people who worked directly for them. The reporter cites many, many of both Tates’ own text messages.

Yes. And the last two sentences of the article are particularly pointed.