lack of volunteers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should hire a teenager to do their volunteer commitments if they don’t want to. I know a bunch of teenagers that would jump on timing a meet for babysitter type pay.

But really, it’s sad that people are so disengaged. We saw it in other sports too, we were always coaching rec teams.

If parents are willing to pay the fine instead of volunteering, why can't the teams do this? My kids have never done swim team and never will but if the pool was willing to pay them $15-20 an hour to work the snack bar or time the races, they would gladly do it.

The pools don’t run swim teams or meets. Volunteers do. Further, there is no money in summer swim team budgets to pay volunteers. A single meet requires 18 timers, several officials, multiple marshals, and an entire data/tables staff. At $20/hour pp, the cost would be in the thousands per meet.
Summer swim is volunteer-run. If you want to participate, you help. If you absolutely can’t, then sure, a family could choose to pay someone to volunteer on its behalf. But to suggest a pool or team could simply pay people for these roles is extremely unrealistic.

The first person is asking a fair question, and the second response actually highlights why the model needs to change.
If a single meet requires dozens of critical roles and cannot function without a huge unpaid labor force, then parents are not "volunteering" in the casual sense, they are staffing the operation. That is real labor.

The idea that there is "no money" is also a choice, not a law of nature. Budgets can be adjusted. Fees can be structured with volunteer credits, opt-out fees, sponsorships, paid core staff, or hybrid models where some roles are compensated and others remain volunteer. Many youth activities already do exactly that.

What has changed is family life. In many households, both parents work, schedules are packed, and free time is limited. Time has become more valuable than it was for prior generations. Paying a fee instead of giving hours is a rational tradeoff for many families.

And let's be honest, timing races, snack bars, data entry, marshaling kids, and meet logistics are operational jobs. Pretending those jobs must only be done for free because "that's how summer swim works" is outdated thinking.
If the program is valuable, then labor should be valued too.

I think most people understand that and that's why the fees to swim are relatively low. If people think money is tight now, they won't be able to afford swimming fees when all the operational labor expenses are included. In my experience swim clubs are upfront about the expectations of parents to make it happen. Why are people agreeing then reneging on their obligation? Stop signing up if making it happen isn't possible for your busy schedule. Cut the freeloading kids if their parents don't step up.

DP. It's terrible to punish kids for the acts of their parents. That mentality flies in the face of what youth sports is supposed to be about. Not every family can contribute in the same way. Some can contribute money but not time, some time but not money, some have difficulty contributing in either way. Why is swim so special, so differently situated, that it requires parents to literally run the meets when nearly every other sport has managed to handle games/meets/tournaments? It's really not. And even if it's true that "this is the way it's always been," it doesn't mean it needs to stay that way for all eternity. There is a documented problem occurring: fewer parents are willing or able to volunteer for various reasons. So why not figure out a better way?

What is youth sports supposed to be about? It's only recently that it's exploded into this money making pay to play machine. In my parents' time, "youth sports" was kids getting their own bat and glove and heading down to the local park to play baseball. They made up their own rules and had to abide by them. There were no parents, umps or anything like that. Same for basketball. Their parents weren't wasting weekends timing youth swim meets. The concept of "youth sports" isn't what you seem to think it is.

I'm 50. I swam in summer swim and played rec basketball and rec soccer. How old are you?

I said “my parents”. Ask your parents about their “youth sports”. It doesn’t look remotely like it does now. Back then kids who never played sports could join their high school team.

My parents were 10 in 1963 and were swimming in the NVSL. My dad also played Little League.

Are you really trying to argue that youth sports haven’t changed from the 1960s?

[Anonymous]

Because they don't want to. Good for them for valuing their free time.

[Anonymous]

I don't have respect for an activity that requires 36 parent volunteers to run a swim meet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should hire a teenager to do their volunteer commitments if they don’t want to. I know a bunch of teenagers that would jump on timing a meet for babysitter type pay.

But really, it’s sad that people are so disengaged. We saw it in other sports too, we were always coaching rec teams.

If parents are willing to pay the fine instead of volunteering, why can't the teams do this? My kids have never done swim team and never will but if the pool was willing to pay them $15-20 an hour to work the snack bar or time the races, they would gladly do it.

The pools don’t run swim teams or meets. Volunteers do. Further, there is no money in summer swim team budgets to pay volunteers. A single meet requires 18 timers, several officials, multiple marshals, and an entire data/tables staff. At $20/hour pp, the cost would be in the thousands per meet.
Summer swim is volunteer-run. If you want to participate, you help. If you absolutely can’t, then sure, a family could choose to pay someone to volunteer on its behalf. But to suggest a pool or team could simply pay people for these roles is extremely unrealistic.

The first person is asking a fair question, and the second response actually highlights why the model needs to change.
If a single meet requires dozens of critical roles and cannot function without a huge unpaid labor force, then parents are not "volunteering" in the casual sense, they are staffing the operation. That is real labor.

The idea that there is "no money" is also a choice, not a law of nature. Budgets can be adjusted. Fees can be structured with volunteer credits, opt-out fees, sponsorships, paid core staff, or hybrid models where some roles are compensated and others remain volunteer. Many youth activities already do exactly that.

What has changed is family life. In many households, both parents work, schedules are packed, and free time is limited. Time has become more valuable than it was for prior generations. Paying a fee instead of giving hours is a rational tradeoff for many families.

And let's be honest, timing races, snack bars, data entry, marshaling kids, and meet logistics are operational jobs. Pretending those jobs must only be done for free because "that's how summer swim works" is outdated thinking.
If the program is valuable, then labor should be valued too.

I think most people understand that and that's why the fees to swim are relatively low. If people think money is tight now, they won't be able to afford swimming fees when all the operational labor expenses are included. In my experience swim clubs are upfront about the expectations of parents to make it happen. Why are people agreeing then reneging on their obligation? Stop signing up if making it happen isn't possible for your busy schedule. Cut the freeloading kids if their parents don't step up.

DP. It's terrible to punish kids for the acts of their parents. That mentality flies in the face of what youth sports is supposed to be about. Not every family can contribute in the same way. Some can contribute money but not time, some time but not money, some have difficulty contributing in either way. Why is swim so special, so differently situated, that it requires parents to literally run the meets when nearly every other sport has managed to handle games/meets/tournaments? It's really not. And even if it's true that "this is the way it's always been," it doesn't mean it needs to stay that way for all eternity. There is a documented problem occurring: fewer parents are willing or able to volunteer for various reasons. So why not figure out a better way?

What is youth sports supposed to be about? It's only recently that it's exploded into this money making pay to play machine. In my parents' time, "youth sports" was kids getting their own bat and glove and heading down to the local park to play baseball. They made up their own rules and had to abide by them. There were no parents, umps or anything like that. Same for basketball. Their parents weren't wasting weekends timing youth swim meets. The concept of "youth sports" isn't what you seem to think it is.

I'm 50. I swam in summer swim and played rec basketball and rec soccer. How old are you?

I said “my parents”. Ask your parents about their “youth sports”. It doesn’t look remotely like it does now. Back then kids who never played sports could join their high school team.

My parents were 10 in 1963 and were swimming in the NVSL. My dad also played Little League.

Your mom certainly wasn’t playing Little League because it wasn’t even legal for girls until the 1970s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should hire a teenager to do their volunteer commitments if they don’t want to. I know a bunch of teenagers that would jump on timing a meet for babysitter type pay.

But really, it’s sad that people are so disengaged. We saw it in other sports too, we were always coaching rec teams.

If parents are willing to pay the fine instead of volunteering, why can't the teams do this? My kids have never done swim team and never will but if the pool was willing to pay them $15-20 an hour to work the snack bar or time the races, they would gladly do it.

The pools don’t run swim teams or meets. Volunteers do. Further, there is no money in summer swim team budgets to pay volunteers. A single meet requires 18 timers, several officials, multiple marshals, and an entire data/tables staff. At $20/hour pp, the cost would be in the thousands per meet.
Summer swim is volunteer-run. If you want to participate, you help. If you absolutely can’t, then sure, a family could choose to pay someone to volunteer on its behalf. But to suggest a pool or team could simply pay people for these roles is extremely unrealistic.

The first person is asking a fair question, and the second response actually highlights why the model needs to change.
If a single meet requires dozens of critical roles and cannot function without a huge unpaid labor force, then parents are not "volunteering" in the casual sense, they are staffing the operation. That is real labor.

The idea that there is "no money" is also a choice, not a law of nature. Budgets can be adjusted. Fees can be structured with volunteer credits, opt-out fees, sponsorships, paid core staff, or hybrid models where some roles are compensated and others remain volunteer. Many youth activities already do exactly that.

What has changed is family life. In many households, both parents work, schedules are packed, and free time is limited. Time has become more valuable than it was for prior generations. Paying a fee instead of giving hours is a rational tradeoff for many families.

And let's be honest, timing races, snack bars, data entry, marshaling kids, and meet logistics are operational jobs. Pretending those jobs must only be done for free because "that's how summer swim works" is outdated thinking.
If the program is valuable, then labor should be valued too.

I think most people understand that and that's why the fees to swim are relatively low. If people think money is tight now, they won't be able to afford swimming fees when all the operational labor expenses are included. In my experience swim clubs are upfront about the expectations of parents to make it happen. Why are people agreeing then reneging on their obligation? Stop signing up if making it happen isn't possible for your busy schedule. Cut the freeloading kids if their parents don't step up.

DP. It's terrible to punish kids for the acts of their parents. That mentality flies in the face of what youth sports is supposed to be about. Not every family can contribute in the same way. Some can contribute money but not time, some time but not money, some have difficulty contributing in either way. Why is swim so special, so differently situated, that it requires parents to literally run the meets when nearly every other sport has managed to handle games/meets/tournaments? It's really not. And even if it's true that "this is the way it's always been," it doesn't mean it needs to stay that way for all eternity. There is a documented problem occurring: fewer parents are willing or able to volunteer for various reasons. So why not figure out a better way?

What is youth sports supposed to be about? It's only recently that it's exploded into this money making pay to play machine. In my parents' time, "youth sports" was kids getting their own bat and glove and heading down to the local park to play baseball. They made up their own rules and had to abide by them. There were no parents, umps or anything like that. Same for basketball. Their parents weren't wasting weekends timing youth swim meets. The concept of "youth sports" isn't what you seem to think it is.

I'm 50. I swam in summer swim and played rec basketball and rec soccer. How old are you?

I said “my parents”. Ask your parents about their “youth sports”. It doesn’t look remotely like it does now. Back then kids who never played sports could join their high school team.

My parents were 10 in 1963 and were swimming in the NVSL. My dad also played Little League.

Your mom certainly wasn’t playing Little League because it wasn’t even legal for girls until the 1970s.

The PP didn't say that. They said the dad played Little League. Parents both swim in the NVSL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should hire a teenager to do their volunteer commitments if they don’t want to. I know a bunch of teenagers that would jump on timing a meet for babysitter type pay.

But really, it’s sad that people are so disengaged. We saw it in other sports too, we were always coaching rec teams.

If parents are willing to pay the fine instead of volunteering, why can't the teams do this? My kids have never done swim team and never will but if the pool was willing to pay them $15-20 an hour to work the snack bar or time the races, they would gladly do it.

The pools don’t run swim teams or meets. Volunteers do. Further, there is no money in summer swim team budgets to pay volunteers. A single meet requires 18 timers, several officials, multiple marshals, and an entire data/tables staff. At $20/hour pp, the cost would be in the thousands per meet.
Summer swim is volunteer-run. If you want to participate, you help. If you absolutely can’t, then sure, a family could choose to pay someone to volunteer on its behalf. But to suggest a pool or team could simply pay people for these roles is extremely unrealistic.

The first person is asking a fair question, and the second response actually highlights why the model needs to change.
If a single meet requires dozens of critical roles and cannot function without a huge unpaid labor force, then parents are not "volunteering" in the casual sense, they are staffing the operation. That is real labor.

The idea that there is "no money" is also a choice, not a law of nature. Budgets can be adjusted. Fees can be structured with volunteer credits, opt-out fees, sponsorships, paid core staff, or hybrid models where some roles are compensated and others remain volunteer. Many youth activities already do exactly that.

What has changed is family life. In many households, both parents work, schedules are packed, and free time is limited. Time has become more valuable than it was for prior generations. Paying a fee instead of giving hours is a rational tradeoff for many families.

And let's be honest, timing races, snack bars, data entry, marshaling kids, and meet logistics are operational jobs. Pretending those jobs must only be done for free because "that's how summer swim works" is outdated thinking.
If the program is valuable, then labor should be valued too.

I think most people understand that and that's why the fees to swim are relatively low. If people think money is tight now, they won't be able to afford swimming fees when all the operational labor expenses are included. In my experience swim clubs are upfront about the expectations of parents to make it happen. Why are people agreeing then reneging on their obligation? Stop signing up if making it happen isn't possible for your busy schedule. Cut the freeloading kids if their parents don't step up.

DP. It's terrible to punish kids for the acts of their parents. That mentality flies in the face of what youth sports is supposed to be about. Not every family can contribute in the same way. Some can contribute money but not time, some time but not money, some have difficulty contributing in either way. Why is swim so special, so differently situated, that it requires parents to literally run the meets when nearly every other sport has managed to handle games/meets/tournaments? It's really not. And even if it's true that "this is the way it's always been," it doesn't mean it needs to stay that way for all eternity. There is a documented problem occurring: fewer parents are willing or able to volunteer for various reasons. So why not figure out a better way?

What is youth sports supposed to be about? It's only recently that it's exploded into this money making pay to play machine. In my parents' time, "youth sports" was kids getting their own bat and glove and heading down to the local park to play baseball. They made up their own rules and had to abide by them. There were no parents, umps or anything like that. Same for basketball. Their parents weren't wasting weekends timing youth swim meets. The concept of "youth sports" isn't what you seem to think it is.

I'm 50. I swam in summer swim and played rec basketball and rec soccer. How old are you?

I said “my parents”. Ask your parents about their “youth sports”. It doesn’t look remotely like it does now. Back then kids who never played sports could join their high school team.

My parents were 10 in 1963 and were swimming in the NVSL. My dad also played Little League.

Your mom certainly wasn’t playing Little League because it wasn’t even legal for girls until the 1970s.

The PP didn't say that. They said the dad played Little League. Parents both swim in the NVSL.

When trying to argue that youth sports haven’t changed much seems a bad idea to highlight a sport that specifically banned girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should hire a teenager to do their volunteer commitments if they don’t want to. I know a bunch of teenagers that would jump on timing a meet for babysitter type pay.

But really, it’s sad that people are so disengaged. We saw it in other sports too, we were always coaching rec teams.

If parents are willing to pay the fine instead of volunteering, why can't the teams do this? My kids have never done swim team and never will but if the pool was willing to pay them $15-20 an hour to work the snack bar or time the races, they would gladly do it.

The pools don’t run swim teams or meets. Volunteers do. Further, there is no money in summer swim team budgets to pay volunteers. A single meet requires 18 timers, several officials, multiple marshals, and an entire data/tables staff. At $20/hour pp, the cost would be in the thousands per meet.
Summer swim is volunteer-run. If you want to participate, you help. If you absolutely can’t, then sure, a family could choose to pay someone to volunteer on its behalf. But to suggest a pool or team could simply pay people for these roles is extremely unrealistic.

The first person is asking a fair question, and the second response actually highlights why the model needs to change.
If a single meet requires dozens of critical roles and cannot function without a huge unpaid labor force, then parents are not "volunteering" in the casual sense, they are staffing the operation. That is real labor.

The idea that there is "no money" is also a choice, not a law of nature. Budgets can be adjusted. Fees can be structured with volunteer credits, opt-out fees, sponsorships, paid core staff, or hybrid models where some roles are compensated and others remain volunteer. Many youth activities already do exactly that.

What has changed is family life. In many households, both parents work, schedules are packed, and free time is limited. Time has become more valuable than it was for prior generations. Paying a fee instead of giving hours is a rational tradeoff for many families.

And let's be honest, timing races, snack bars, data entry, marshaling kids, and meet logistics are operational jobs. Pretending those jobs must only be done for free because "that's how summer swim works" is outdated thinking.
If the program is valuable, then labor should be valued too.

I think most people understand that and that's why the fees to swim are relatively low. If people think money is tight now, they won't be able to afford swimming fees when all the operational labor expenses are included. In my experience swim clubs are upfront about the expectations of parents to make it happen. Why are people agreeing then reneging on their obligation? Stop signing up if making it happen isn't possible for your busy schedule. Cut the freeloading kids if their parents don't step up.

DP. It's terrible to punish kids for the acts of their parents. That mentality flies in the face of what youth sports is supposed to be about. Not every family can contribute in the same way. Some can contribute money but not time, some time but not money, some have difficulty contributing in either way. Why is swim so special, so differently situated, that it requires parents to literally run the meets when nearly every other sport has managed to handle games/meets/tournaments? It's really not. And even if it's true that "this is the way it's always been," it doesn't mean it needs to stay that way for all eternity. There is a documented problem occurring: fewer parents are willing or able to volunteer for various reasons. So why not figure out a better way?

What is youth sports supposed to be about? It's only recently that it's exploded into this money making pay to play machine. In my parents' time, "youth sports" was kids getting their own bat and glove and heading down to the local park to play baseball. They made up their own rules and had to abide by them. There were no parents, umps or anything like that. Same for basketball. Their parents weren't wasting weekends timing youth swim meets. The concept of "youth sports" isn't what you seem to think it is.

I'm 50. I swam in summer swim and played rec basketball and rec soccer. How old are you?

I said “my parents”. Ask your parents about their “youth sports”. It doesn’t look remotely like it does now. Back then kids who never played sports could join their high school team.

My parents were 10 in 1963 and were swimming in the NVSL. My dad also played Little League.

Your mom certainly wasn’t playing Little League because it wasn’t even legal for girls until the 1970s.

The PP didn't say that. They said the dad played Little League. Parents both swim in the NVSL.

When trying to argue that youth sports haven’t changed much seems a bad idea to highlight a sport that specifically banned girls.

The point is that organized sports existed then, and still needed the same volunteer roles filled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should hire a teenager to do their volunteer commitments if they don’t want to. I know a bunch of teenagers that would jump on timing a meet for babysitter type pay.

But really, it’s sad that people are so disengaged. We saw it in other sports too, we were always coaching rec teams.

If parents are willing to pay the fine instead of volunteering, why can't the teams do this? My kids have never done swim team and never will but if the pool was willing to pay them $15-20 an hour to work the snack bar or time the races, they would gladly do it.

The pools don’t run swim teams or meets. Volunteers do. Further, there is no money in summer swim team budgets to pay volunteers. A single meet requires 18 timers, several officials, multiple marshals, and an entire data/tables staff. At $20/hour pp, the cost would be in the thousands per meet.
Summer swim is volunteer-run. If you want to participate, you help. If you absolutely can’t, then sure, a family could choose to pay someone to volunteer on its behalf. But to suggest a pool or team could simply pay people for these roles is extremely unrealistic.

The first person is asking a fair question, and the second response actually highlights why the model needs to change.
If a single meet requires dozens of critical roles and cannot function without a huge unpaid labor force, then parents are not "volunteering" in the casual sense, they are staffing the operation. That is real labor.

The idea that there is "no money" is also a choice, not a law of nature. Budgets can be adjusted. Fees can be structured with volunteer credits, opt-out fees, sponsorships, paid core staff, or hybrid models where some roles are compensated and others remain volunteer. Many youth activities already do exactly that.

What has changed is family life. In many households, both parents work, schedules are packed, and free time is limited. Time has become more valuable than it was for prior generations. Paying a fee instead of giving hours is a rational tradeoff for many families.

And let's be honest, timing races, snack bars, data entry, marshaling kids, and meet logistics are operational jobs. Pretending those jobs must only be done for free because "that's how summer swim works" is outdated thinking.
If the program is valuable, then labor should be valued too.

I think most people understand that and that's why the fees to swim are relatively low. If people think money is tight now, they won't be able to afford swimming fees when all the operational labor expenses are included. In my experience swim clubs are upfront about the expectations of parents to make it happen. Why are people agreeing then reneging on their obligation? Stop signing up if making it happen isn't possible for your busy schedule. Cut the freeloading kids if their parents don't step up.

DP. It's terrible to punish kids for the acts of their parents. That mentality flies in the face of what youth sports is supposed to be about. Not every family can contribute in the same way. Some can contribute money but not time, some time but not money, some have difficulty contributing in either way. Why is swim so special, so differently situated, that it requires parents to literally run the meets when nearly every other sport has managed to handle games/meets/tournaments? It's really not. And even if it's true that "this is the way it's always been," it doesn't mean it needs to stay that way for all eternity. There is a documented problem occurring: fewer parents are willing or able to volunteer for various reasons. So why not figure out a better way?

What is youth sports supposed to be about? It's only recently that it's exploded into this money making pay to play machine. In my parents' time, "youth sports" was kids getting their own bat and glove and heading down to the local park to play baseball. They made up their own rules and had to abide by them. There were no parents, umps or anything like that. Same for basketball. Their parents weren't wasting weekends timing youth swim meets. The concept of "youth sports" isn't what you seem to think it is.

I'm 50. I swam in summer swim and played rec basketball and rec soccer. How old are you?

I said “my parents”. Ask your parents about their “youth sports”. It doesn’t look remotely like it does now. Back then kids who never played sports could join their high school team.

My parents were 10 in 1963 and were swimming in the NVSL. My dad also played Little League.

Your mom certainly wasn’t playing Little League because it wasn’t even legal for girls until the 1970s.

The PP didn't say that. They said the dad played Little League. Parents both swim in the NVSL.

When trying to argue that youth sports haven’t changed much seems a bad idea to highlight a sport that specifically banned girls.

The point is that organized sports existed then, and still needed the same volunteer roles filled.

No, it did not. There was no sign up Genius for team snacks, team mom, travel baseball etc etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's hard to find the time to volunteer for anything if you work full time, but summer swim is particularly rough. It starts in June when school is still in session and there's a flurry of end-of-year school activities. In our case, my kids are still in school for the first 3 weeks of the season and it's madness. On top of that, there is often overlap with spring or club sports wrapping up for the season. It's non-stop for nearly the entire month.

My kids are old enough now that I can let them manage themselves during the meets and they'll keep track of their events, and I can volunteer during the meets. But that wasn't the case when they were younger! There is no way my youngest would've made it to any of her events if she was left to manage herself during meets.

I am so tired of that excuse that your kids are so helpless they need you hovering. There are so many coaches and helpers in the team area. Let them know of your concern the kid might get distracted and let them do their job while you do one of your own.

You know every team is different right? The coaches on our team don’t watch the kids who aren’t in the water. They are there to coach not babysit. And there are approximately 40 kids in under 8 group alone. Our team is huge. There are no “helpers” watching these kids. That’s a joke. So yeah, when my 6 year old swam one 25 free and then had nothing to do for the next 3 hours, someone had to keep an eye on her. Too bad.

Let me guess: you’re also the person who complains when people don’t pay attention to their kids and let them go wild.

DP here but if your child can only swim freestyle, why is she on the team and not the preteam? Our preteam volunteer requirement is very low. In fact, bringing a snack or doing a craft at a pep rally takes care of that requirement.

Our team doesn't have a preteam. And there is only one meet on one day for ALL of the swimmers. Again, every team is different.

Working meets is the only way to volunteer?

There are volunteer opportunities during practices but practice starts at 5pm. That leaves only the Saturday meets for parents who can't make it at 5pm during weekdays.

We all make choices.

Exactly. Since you have so much free time and choose to spend it volunteering, why complain about others who choose differently?

Where did I imply I had so much free time? There are many things my kids don’t get to do whether it’s due to time, location or cost. The things we do sign up for sometimes require us to take time off work or hire a sitter. But if you aren’t willing to make those sacrifices, then your kids don’t participate. No judgement- just don’t sign up for an activity knowing you can’t fulfill the volunteer requirements.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't have respect for an activity that requires 36 parent volunteers to run a swim meet.

Then why are you posting in a forum about swimming?! So weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because they don't want to. Good for them for valuing their free time.

Great then those parents can spend that extra time with their precious children at home.

[Anonymous]

Why cant the older swimmers do some of the timing? Or take the swim & turn clinic to be "certified"?
Therefore, reducing the volunteer load of parents.

The older kids don't swim until the end of a meet so the first part (like fir the 8& indrrs through like 9/10) can be the older kids being the clerk of course or the data runner or a timer. Theyre not doing much in the first part of a meeting anyway. And the coach can have them switch out so not one older kid is stuck in the same thing.

Im making this suggestion from years of volleyball (and also from yrs on our neighborhood swim team so ive seen how lack of volunteers is so tough). In volleyball, DD is required to take referee training and score keeping bc the girls rotate as down refs, score keepers, and line judges during the "down time" between their games in their tournament.
The traing also helps the players learn a lot of the rules and roation regulations too for example. So it's a win-win all around.

Could work, the idea needs to be tweaked a bit, but it could def work for something like the low pressure Monday B meets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why cant the older swimmers do some of the timing? Or take the swim & turn clinic to be "certified"?
Therefore, reducing the volunteer load of parents.

The older kids don't swim until the end of a meet so the first part (like fir the 8& indrrs through like 9/10) can be the older kids being the clerk of course or the data runner or a timer. Theyre not doing much in the first part of a meeting anyway. And the coach can have them switch out so not one older kid is stuck in the same thing.

Im making this suggestion from years of volleyball (and also from yrs on our neighborhood swim team so ive seen how lack of volunteers is so tough). In volleyball, DD is required to take referee training and score keeping bc the girls rotate as down refs, score keepers, and line judges during the "down time" between their games in their tournament.
The traing also helps the players learn a lot of the rules and roation regulations too for example. So it's a win-win all around.

Could work, the idea needs to be tweaked a bit, but it could def work for something like the low pressure Monday B meets.

Maybe that’s an NVSL line up but in MCSL they do all the freestyle and then all the backstroke. They don’t do all the little kid races and then then the big ones. So kids would need to be rotating out every few races.

Also do your volleyball kids red their own teams? That seems like a temptation to cheat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why cant the older swimmers do some of the timing? Or take the swim & turn clinic to be "certified"?
Therefore, reducing the volunteer load of parents.

The older kids don't swim until the end of a meet so the first part (like fir the 8& indrrs through like 9/10) can be the older kids being the clerk of course or the data runner or a timer. Theyre not doing much in the first part of a meeting anyway. And the coach can have them switch out so not one older kid is stuck in the same thing.

Im making this suggestion from years of volleyball (and also from yrs on our neighborhood swim team so ive seen how lack of volunteers is so tough). In volleyball, DD is required to take referee training and score keeping bc the girls rotate as down refs, score keepers, and line judges during the "down time" between their games in their tournament.
The traing also helps the players learn a lot of the rules and roation regulations too for example. So it's a win-win all around.

Could work, the idea needs to be tweaked a bit, but it could def work for something like the low pressure Monday B meets.

No, older kids are swimming, coaching and lifeguarding. Lazy parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People should hire a teenager to do their volunteer commitments if they don’t want to. I know a bunch of teenagers that would jump on timing a meet for babysitter type pay.

But really, it’s sad that people are so disengaged. We saw it in other sports too, we were always coaching rec teams.

If parents are willing to pay the fine instead of volunteering, why can't the teams do this? My kids have never done swim team and never will but if the pool was willing to pay them $15-20 an hour to work the snack bar or time the races, they would gladly do it.

The pools don’t run swim teams or meets. Volunteers do. Further, there is no money in summer swim team budgets to pay volunteers. A single meet requires 18 timers, several officials, multiple marshals, and an entire data/tables staff. At $20/hour pp, the cost would be in the thousands per meet.
Summer swim is volunteer-run. If you want to participate, you help. If you absolutely can’t, then sure, a family could choose to pay someone to volunteer on its behalf. But to suggest a pool or team could simply pay people for these roles is extremely unrealistic.

The first person is asking a fair question, and the second response actually highlights why the model needs to change.
If a single meet requires dozens of critical roles and cannot function without a huge unpaid labor force, then parents are not "volunteering" in the casual sense, they are staffing the operation. That is real labor.

The idea that there is "no money" is also a choice, not a law of nature. Budgets can be adjusted. Fees can be structured with volunteer credits, opt-out fees, sponsorships, paid core staff, or hybrid models where some roles are compensated and others remain volunteer. Many youth activities already do exactly that.

What has changed is family life. In many households, both parents work, schedules are packed, and free time is limited. Time has become more valuable than it was for prior generations. Paying a fee instead of giving hours is a rational tradeoff for many families.

And let's be honest, timing races, snack bars, data entry, marshaling kids, and meet logistics are operational jobs. Pretending those jobs must only be done for free because "that's how summer swim works" is outdated thinking.
If the program is valuable, then labor should be valued too.

I think most people understand that and that's why the fees to swim are relatively low. If people think money is tight now, they won't be able to afford swimming fees when all the operational labor expenses are included. In my experience swim clubs are upfront about the expectations of parents to make it happen. Why are people agreeing then reneging on their obligation? Stop signing up if making it happen isn't possible for your busy schedule. Cut the freeloading kids if their parents don't step up.

DP. It's terrible to punish kids for the acts of their parents. That mentality flies in the face of what youth sports is supposed to be about. Not every family can contribute in the same way. Some can contribute money but not time, some time but not money, some have difficulty contributing in either way. Why is swim so special, so differently situated, that it requires parents to literally run the meets when nearly every other sport has managed to handle games/meets/tournaments? It's really not. And even if it's true that "this is the way it's always been," it doesn't mean it needs to stay that way for all eternity. There is a documented problem occurring: fewer parents are willing or able to volunteer for various reasons. So why not figure out a better way?

What is youth sports supposed to be about? It's only recently that it's exploded into this money making pay to play machine. In my parents' time, "youth sports" was kids getting their own bat and glove and heading down to the local park to play baseball. They made up their own rules and had to abide by them. There were no parents, umps or anything like that. Same for basketball. Their parents weren't wasting weekends timing youth swim meets. The concept of "youth sports" isn't what you seem to think it is.

I'm 50. I swam in summer swim and played rec basketball and rec soccer. How old are you?

I said “my parents”. Ask your parents about their “youth sports”. It doesn’t look remotely like it does now. Back then kids who never played sports could join their high school team.

My parents were 10 in 1963 and were swimming in the NVSL. My dad also played Little League.

Your mom certainly wasn’t playing Little League because it wasn’t even legal for girls until the 1970s.

The PP didn't say that. They said the dad played Little League. Parents both swim in the NVSL.

When trying to argue that youth sports haven’t changed much seems a bad idea to highlight a sport that specifically banned girls.

The point is that organized sports existed then, and still needed the same volunteer roles filled.

No, it did not. There was no sign up Genius for team snacks, team mom, travel baseball etc etc.

Not online but there were signups.