Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I mean, it’s nothing like Streets of Philadelphia, and the guy is now 70?
For a 3 day effort and time, it’s good. It’s not great but can’t expect more in 3 days.
And it is good enough to get people to keep on talking about the horrific acts of ICE and the Trump administration that directs it.
I’m amazed and impressed by his initiative, his passion, and his commitment to speaking up and speaking the truth. I’m not even a Springsteen fan.
That’s what’s happening here. There are a lot of risks to speaking up in the US these days. But he’s not keeping his head down low. He’s speaking up and out in the best way he can.
We should applaud him for that even if you hate his past or current songs.
Plenty of pro-Conservative songs released after various events. So what? It’s what artists do.
It’s the fact that it is anti Trump and it is/has been risky to go against him in publicly due to fear of retaliation.
Hence Amazon giving Melania $40 million to make a vapid film and other corporate and artist a**kissers (looking at you Nicki Minaj).
Plenty of conservative artists released anti-Biden music during his term. Being edgy means you take risks in offending the powerful. Springsteen’s song is a money grab and a chance to get his song as the anti-ICE anthem.
Offending Trump means risking being targeted for retaliation by Trump, whether on social media or in real life.
Offending Biden did not.
Not the same level of risk.
And I don’t think Springsteen needs more money. I think he is true in his intentions.
If the previous statement is inaccurate,
please share an example of an Anti Biden song that lead to retaliation by the Biden administration, with evidence.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}