Jury refuses to indict Sandwich Man and other Trump cop misadventures

[Anonymous]

If sandwich man loses his job, the commanders need a tight end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One president had three terms. Trump is changing the law so he can run again. Just like he changed 150 laws since Jan. 20th.

For those who aren’t familiar with the US Constitution, Trump can’t change a law to make himself eligible for a third term. After FDR was elected a third time, the Constitution was amended to prohibit anyone from being elected president more than twice. Another Constitutional amendment would be required to legitimize a third Trump term. It’s much harder to change the Constitution than it is to change legislation.

[Anonymous]

Subway sandwich shop needs to name a sub sandwich after the sandwich man. What should it be called? How about "The ManWich". Anyone have any ideas?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One president had three terms. Trump is changing the law so he can run again. Just like he changed 150 laws since Jan. 20th.

For those who aren’t familiar with the US Constitution, Trump can’t change a law to make himself eligible for a third term. After FDR was elected a third time, the Constitution was amended to prohibit anyone from being elected president more than twice. Another Constitutional amendment would be required to legitimize a third Trump term. It’s much harder to change the Constitution than it is to change legislation.

And the First Amendment protects flag burning, but that didn't stop him from trying that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the sandwich thrower was a young black man and the was white, would we have this same outcome.

Where are you posting from, because we know it is not DC. Stick to your own backyard because you know nothing about DC and the criminal justice system.

Actually, pretty much the world knows that the DC criminal justice system is a system geared to be soft on crime with leniency for those who commit crimes and less concern for victims.

Are you talking about the J6 traitors?

Sure, along with all who committed crimes that resulted in injury or death but received no real punishment. .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One president had three terms. Trump is changing the law so he can run again. Just like he changed 150 laws since Jan. 20th.

^ This ignorance is what we get from not teaching liberal arts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope that he sues over the loss of his job.

He will. And needs to win.

It is very hard for an attorney to argue they did not know it was wrong to assault a cop. I'd love to know what his excuse is - "temporary insanity?"

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope that he sues over the loss of his job.

He will. And needs to win.

It is very hard for an attorney to argue they did not know it was wrong to assault a cop. I'd love to know what his excuse is - "temporary insanity?"

It was a fu(king sandwich. This is wasting taxpayer money.

But it shows horrible jugement for someone who works in law enforcement.

+1 Childish behavior. Drunk. Screams obscenities and throws food at people when angry. Assaults a law enforcement officer. That's the kind of man we want working in the DOJ?!

This.

[Anonymous]

Good

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope that he sues over the loss of his job.

He will. And needs to win.

It is very hard for an attorney to argue they did not know it was wrong to assault a cop. I'd love to know what his excuse is - "temporary insanity?"

It was a fu(king sandwich. This is wasting taxpayer money.

I don't know how "assault" is defined in DC, but in most jurisdictions, there has to be some intent to do physical bodily harm. I can't see that throwing a sandwich shows that intent. And did he throw it in general, or at a particular person? Either way, a sandwich is not a deadly weapon and it can't even leave a bruise, unless it's thrown by a major league pitcher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope that he sues over the loss of his job.

He will. And needs to win.

It is very hard for an attorney to argue they did not know it was wrong to assault a cop. I'd love to know what his excuse is - "temporary insanity?"

It was a fu(king sandwich. This is wasting taxpayer money.

I don't know how "assault" is defined in DC, but in most jurisdictions, there has to be some intent to do physical bodily harm. I can't see that throwing a sandwich shows that intent. And did he throw it in general, or at a particular person? Either way, a sandwich is not a deadly weapon and it can't even leave a bruise, unless it's thrown by a major league pitcher.

How do you feel about a kid throwing his food or an wraser at a teacher?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope that he sues over the loss of his job.

He will. And needs to win.

It is very hard for an attorney to argue they did not know it was wrong to assault a cop. I'd love to know what his excuse is - "temporary insanity?"

It was a fu(king sandwich. This is wasting taxpayer money.

But it shows horrible jugement for someone who works in law enforcement.

+1 Childish behavior. Drunk. Screams obscenities and throws food at people when angry. Assaults a law enforcement officer. That's the kind of man we want working in the DOJ?!

This.

Certainly not good for keeping a security clearance (if he has one)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope that he sues over the loss of his job.

He will. And needs to win.

It is very hard for an attorney to argue they did not know it was wrong to assault a cop. I'd love to know what his excuse is - "temporary insanity?"

It was a fu(king sandwich. This is wasting taxpayer money.

I don't know how "assault" is defined in DC, but in most jurisdictions, there has to be some intent to do physical bodily harm. I can't see that throwing a sandwich shows that intent. And did he throw it in general, or at a particular person? Either way, a sandwich is not a deadly weapon and it can't even leave a bruise, unless it's thrown by a major league pitcher.

How do you feel about a kid throwing his food or an wraser at a teacher?

Death Penalty

[Anonymous]

He was littering. That's against the law. $75 fine.

[Anonymous]

The evidence (sub sandwich) got eaten so they dismissed the case.