Depends on what you mean by "coveted job." My child is in the industrial part of engineering, not in the consulting side. 1100 SATs but is thriving in a college without a DCUM pedigree - published and award recipient for honors engineering project. Child has a job offer for after graduation starting at $80k in a small city, with a pension, great healthcare, and they will pay for the masters. |
They hired tier 2 engineers I suppose |
This list, adjusted by Enrollment(tho they should have used Engineering/CS enrollment, not total) closely parallels our main recruiting targets with many ivies plus a few top publics in Eng. It also overlaps with the Jane street list from the current intern that has MIT ivies and top publics, though JS is quant and we are tech consulting. Targeting can seem unfair but it is the most efficient way to get top talent. We have experience with the rigor of these schools. That being said there are many internships outside the top companies. Small companies can sometimes be better internship experiences. No panic needed if you are not at a school on all the lists. And realize that the competition within those schools is often fierce |
The same usual suspects |
This is very specific to STEM majors and converting them (mostly) corporate jobs. A very specific type of school is the stepping stone for this path. Most of these grads will need to pursue a masters or higher immediately or eventually. Many schools are very good for pre-med, pre-law, business school admissions, and public administration/public service (which I know gets trashed on this board, but still has competitive graduate programs). Your undergrad matters less 5 years out and even less if you obtain a graduate degree. Graduate programs have a lot more nuance on recruitment than HR departments and the DCUM thought leaders . |
So in summary, go to an Ivie or a Top Public specific for Engineering to land the first best job out kid college. Got it. |
Unless you don’t want to be a quant? This thread took a weird turn where apparently that’s the only “top” job available. |
Depending on what you mean by top. Most students would kill to swap into Jane Street from MBB and Goldman Sachs. It’s like comparing Harvard and Boston College. Both are great choices, but if you’re a double admit, which one would you choose? |
Plenty would choose MBB or Goldman. These are all different roles. They are not interchangeable for most people, except those lacking in direction. |
That’s false. JS NGs are paid at the similar level to Goldman’s MDs (more junior ones). Money is not the only factor but it can change things. It’s actually a consensus on Wall Street that sell side is on the lower end of the food chain relative to buy side. |
UT Austin, Dartmouth, UVA, NYU, Brown stand out. |
|
Most people would reach a complete halt in their career going into quant. Most people are not intelligent or skilled enough to lead a meaningful career in quant finance. |
UT Austin mostly because of their Turing program. |
MBB are fake jobs for kids who didn’t hack it in their program. How is MBB even in this discussion? Their presentations may impress the leadership team at Callahan Auto Parts, but they’re hired as a CYA exercise by Fortune 500 execs too afraid to think for themselves.
The paycheck at management consultants can be big but it’s a wash out destination. |