Forum Index
»
Tweens and Teens
|
My vote is the kid went to private school where sports teams were always hour 8 and in lieu of PE class.
And had tiger mom Asian or Indian parents. They take school and college seriously. And can be well-resourced. This does not sound like a magnet school scholar athlete. Those are rare. |
Agree. All manageable. Boarding schools with recruiter level sports programs also give big scholarships and discounts if a top athlete and not going to pay full freight. |
It's easy to be good at any sport if you play many sports—they all feed off each other. The same goes for music—kids who are musically inclined can pick up multiple instruments. He sounds like my middle school kid. He's not the best at any sport right now, but he plays three sports at a high level. He plays two instruments in the school band (one for the regular band and another for the jazz band) and plays guitar, piano, and violin at home as the mood strikes. Unclear whether any of this matters other than he's too busy to get into trouble and he has a lot depth. |
The kids who actually belong in BC, AP Chem and AP Lit are definitely done with hw within 2 hours. Some kids really are at the top, the rest are just being pushed by their parents |
+1. We have one of each. Self driven and smart. Not driven and smart, doesn’t apply themselves. |
At McLean HS, there is one 10 year-old boy taking multi variable calculus in a class with all seniors. At TJ, there is a different 10 year-old; a girl, and she did not gain admission with just the bare minimum of only non-honors algebra in 8th grade. Both of these 10 year-olds are keeping up with their classmates and doing well, grade wise. Why do so many of you disbelieve in excellence? |
Your HHI must be around 300K. You’re not middle class (you’re upper middle class). |
NP. There are so many colleges here and athletes there who will do private lessons. For less than $100 a half hour. But that takes parental effort to talk and call around. |
And? Poster I replied to continues to not be middle class. You think hiring a kid to play catch or shoot hoops with your kids is more parental effort than doing it yourself, btw? |
DP. We never played lacrosse, so hiring a college kid to get our kid started with a decent form made perfect sense. We play catch with them, too, but they correct us! |
And that’s all well and good. I get that it makes sense when you don’t know what you’re doing. But is it really more *effort* to pay money to someone else to play with your kid? (Obviously I am taking issue with the doofus I responded to before you, not anyone who gets coaching for their kids!) |
How is this excellence? |
What does this mean? |
Another DP. I've had to call around to find a pitching coach for my kid (because softball pitching is incredibly complicated and there are major differences between schools of thought so we can't just learn it via YouTube) and to find music teachers. I really, really tried to find high school or college athletes or musicians to do it, because professionals are pretty expensive in all cases. It was HARD. In the case of the pitching coach, I stumbled accidentally on someone who pointed me to the motherload of student-athletes. In the case of music teachers, I never was able to find someone despite months of searching and asking around. Mentally it was more exhausting than all the time I spend catching for my pitcher while she's practicing, though it took less time to actually get the lists and make the calls. Even finding the professional teachers we ended up using for music was a lot of work. And no, I can't teach my kids to play their instruments because I don't play myself. My role in that is just making sure they practice an adequate amount. Maybe I'm atypical (or a doofus), but I can see where PP is coming from. |
Hey “doofus”: No one here said it was “more” effort than DIY. They said it was effort to find a tutor or a private coach. It didn’t magically happen. They also said there are reasonably priced options with college students in our college town. |