What if we gave them $50k? /s |
I'm in the Midwest and here's how that cheap housing works: Old person dies and old house goes on the market for cheap. Flipper buys house, paints walls gray, adds gray LVP and white kitchen. Sells house for 3x what they paid to mystery offshore LLC. LLC rents house out, renters do not take care of house, property looks like a garbage dump. Neighbors sell their houses to escape and mystery offshore LLC buys them as well. The cycle continues. |
+1 Free phones, free college education, now free down payments. What’s next, I wonder. |
I 100% guarantee that within months of this free money being handed out, if it does happen, there will be complaints that it isn't sufficient. "I need a house in a GOOD school district for my kids" "I need a house with enough bedrooms for all my kids" "I need a house that's brand-new because I work 3 jobs and don't have time to make repairs." And the party of Joy will cry out at the cruelty of ONLY giving out $25k and can't we do better? |
If a country's policy is always driven by people who did not have something before and hence are opposed to it for anyone else to have it we would be stuck at Stone Age. Grow up and let our country move forward! |
Uh, I realize you meant that as some kind of mean spirited sarcasm, but here’s the thing - you’re so hateful you don’t even realize those are all valid points and should all be addressed. $25k isn’t enough. Mostly because greedy people (like you) will just raise your home prices $25k. So really it should be $100k, not $25k As for school districts, yes - we SHOULD be helping single moms live in better school districts because better education means kids escape multigenerational poverty. New homes? Absolutely. What single mother has enough time or knowledge to deal with a fixer upper home in whatever little off time she has from her multiple jobs. A house with multiple bedrooms? Uh, yes. Do you really expect brothers and sisters to stay in the same bedroom past 10-12 years old? Why would think it’s ok to subject a young girl to that? Sicko. So yes, we CAN do better than $25k. That’s basically nothing. |
And you double down on the drama. Well done. Not handing out free money to people is not abuse. Full stop. |
LOL, thanks for making the point as to why this "policy" is pure folly. How much should we as a nation spend on helping people buy houses? Do you see any downsides to helping people buy houses that they may not be able to afford or maintain longer term? |
Why can not it be both? Why is it always a zero-sum game? Advocate for your beliefs, but policies should not be "my way or highway"! |
Of course it comes down to this and just this. Anyone who supports free money is a decent and wonderful human in line for the Nobel Peace Prize. Absolute cream of the crop in terms of kindness and decency. Mother Teresa’s, if you will. Those who don’t are awful trumper KKK confederate flag flying pieces of absolute sh¡t that need to rot in hell. They should have never been born in the first place. This is totes the was it must be. It’s the only explanation. |
Sadly, I think this poster is serious. |
This was one of the original knocks against democracy. People would eventually vote to loot the treasury. |
+1 |
Joey Mannarino, is that you? |
You guys are so oblivious to how much of the federal budget subsidizes corporations. Even in programs that help low income people, if you follow the money it ends up in corporations. Poor people don’t have political power. Corporations own the Senate, the courts, and state and local governments. Every government program is designed to benefit the corporate and financial establishment. This program will be taken over by developers, lenders, home builders, realtors, et al, just like every other housing program, but at least it will provide some assistance to moderate income households. |