Is WashU declining?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping

It’s need blind

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.

You sound like a wacko

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

Yes, these universities in red states are full of leftists who are volunteering actively and helping women in these states get the services they need.

[Anonymous]

It is in Missouri.
If you send a kind there now you are 100% an dumbass

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is in Missouri.
If you send a kind there now you are 100% an dumbass

The only thing dumbass here is your dumbass comment conflating one school with an entire state

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.

+1

Lets see how long red states last without blue giving them funds.

Plus red state people are idiots voting for people like jordan 14 times. If you don't do your job you get fired. Jordan does nothing not one bill nothing and people who are literal morons keep voting in shit like him and Vance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.

+1

Lets see how long red states last without blue giving them funds.

Plus red state people are idiots voting for people like jordan 14 times. If you don't do your job you get fired. Jordan does nothing not one bill nothing and people who are literal morons keep voting in shit like him and Vance.

It’s people like you who are part of the problem but you are way too blind to see that

[Anonymous]

Folks, this is a troll thread full of astroturfing and intentionally incorrect information. Astroturfing is where a single person or small number of people use internet anonymity to create the appearance of the "grass roots" sentiment of many. It usually involves situations where, for example, a new restaurant would post positive but fake reviews of itself on Yelp. But it fits here.

I'm genuinely curious what the anti-WashU poster's deal is. There are places and colleges in America that I'm not wild about. But I can imagine having so much antipathy for a particular college to justify so many posts with such vigor. If OP wants to convince me not to have my kid apply to WashU, perhaps he/she can explain what WashU did to hurt him/her so badly. No sane person would otherwise do what he/she is doing on DCUM.

Anonymous wrote:In response to OP's question, WashU has been a good school many decades. It's fine. Also, OP please post your source for the 40% ED claim. Prove you're not a troll because I'm deeply skeptical.

WashU hasn't yet released their ED info for this cycle or last year's cycle. But for 21/22, WashU ED admissions rate was 26%. (https://wustl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/wustl-cds-2022-2023.pdf). I doubt it jumped 14%, which is contrary to T30 trends. Notably, OP never responded to the post above.

Anonymous wrote:wow 40%? Will speak to my junior DC tomorrow - this is not the prestige we are seeking

Does this sound like it was written by a normal human being, let alone one whose opinions you'd value?

Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping

WashU is need blind for domestic applicants. (https://financialaid.wustl.edu/how-aid-works/affordability/). The post above is blatant misinformation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.

+1

Lets see how long red states last without blue giving them funds.

Plus red state people are idiots voting for people like jordan 14 times. If you don't do your job you get fired. Jordan does nothing not one bill nothing and people who are literal morons keep voting in shit like him and Vance.

Red states like MO, MS, LA, AL receive more in federal monies than they pay out largely due to their large black populations. Your racism is showing, Karen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The current GOP candidate for governor is a KKK member. This is verified. If you send your child to WashU or any school in this state I question your morals.

Isn't it a good thing to send more voters to the state to oppose such candidates?

Seems to me that's the moral course here.

No, we should not subsidize any entities in red states. Financially or morally.

+1

Lets see how long red states last without blue giving them funds.

Plus red state people are idiots voting for people like jordan 14 times. If you don't do your job you get fired. Jordan does nothing not one bill nothing and people who are literal morons keep voting in shit like him and Vance.

Let's see how long YOU last without patriotic kids from red states volunteering to serve in the military in order to preserve your freedoms, even though you are dripping with contempt for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Folks, this is a troll thread full of astroturfing and intentionally incorrect information. Astroturfing is where a single person or small number of people use internet anonymity to create the appearance of the "grass roots" sentiment of many. It usually involves situations where, for example, a new restaurant would post positive but fake reviews of itself on Yelp. But it fits here.

I'm genuinely curious what the anti-WashU poster's deal is. There are places and colleges in America that I'm not wild about. But I can imagine having so much antipathy for a particular college to justify so many posts with such vigor. If OP wants to convince me not to have my kid apply to WashU, perhaps he/she can explain what WashU did to hurt him/her so badly. No sane person would otherwise do what he/she is doing on DCUM.

Anonymous wrote:In response to OP's question, WashU has been a good school many decades. It's fine. Also, OP please post your source for the 40% ED claim. Prove you're not a troll because I'm deeply skeptical.

WashU hasn't yet released their ED info for this cycle or last year's cycle. But for 21/22, WashU ED admissions rate was 26%. (https://wustl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/wustl-cds-2022-2023.pdf). I doubt it jumped 14%, which is contrary to T30 trends. Notably, OP never responded to the post above.

Anonymous wrote:wow 40%? Will speak to my junior DC tomorrow - this is not the prestige we are seeking

Does this sound like it was written by a normal human being, let alone one whose opinions you'd value?

Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping

WashU is need blind for domestic applicants. (https://financialaid.wustl.edu/how-aid-works/affordability/). The post above is blatant misinformation.

Rational and excellent points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Folks, this is a troll thread full of astroturfing and intentionally incorrect information. Astroturfing is where a single person or small number of people use internet anonymity to create the appearance of the "grass roots" sentiment of many. It usually involves situations where, for example, a new restaurant would post positive but fake reviews of itself on Yelp. But it fits here.

I'm genuinely curious what the anti-WashU poster's deal is. There are places and colleges in America that I'm not wild about. But I can imagine having so much antipathy for a particular college to justify so many posts with such vigor. If OP wants to convince me not to have my kid apply to WashU, perhaps he/she can explain what WashU did to hurt him/her so badly. No sane person would otherwise do what he/she is doing on DCUM.

Anonymous wrote:In response to OP's question, WashU has been a good school many decades. It's fine. Also, OP please post your source for the 40% ED claim. Prove you're not a troll because I'm deeply skeptical.

WashU hasn't yet released their ED info for this cycle or last year's cycle. But for 21/22, WashU ED admissions rate was 26%. (https://wustl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/wustl-cds-2022-2023.pdf). I doubt it jumped 14%, which is contrary to T30 trends. Notably, OP never responded to the post above.

Anonymous wrote:wow 40%? Will speak to my junior DC tomorrow - this is not the prestige we are seeking

Does this sound like it was written by a normal human being, let alone one whose opinions you'd value?

Anonymous wrote:It's declining because it is one of the few need aware hold outs among top schools. A need aware school that costs 83k is going to slip. The only other similarly priced and rated school is Tufts, and they are also slipping

WashU is need blind for domestic applicants. (https://financialaid.wustl.edu/how-aid-works/affordability/). The post above is blatant misinformation.

OR, you as an individual are putting time and energy into defending WashU on an anonymous forum, and others are doing the same from their perspective. For every fan there is a hater, no AstroTurf required.

My take it is a hard school to keep track of because the name is so generic. A couple of top students my DC's year knew to apply, because of automatic merit scholar awards. Both were flown out at the school's expense for an admitted student's day. Neither took the offer because it was still very expensive. One went to a state school. The other went to Harvey Mudd, even though that was more expensive still. It's a school that caters to private school kids, where it's cache has a longer shelf life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OR, you as an individual are putting time and energy into defending WashU on an anonymous forum, and others are doing the same from their perspective. For every fan there is a hater, no AstroTurf required.

PP here. I don't give a fig about WashU, and I'm totally okay with people expressing varying opinions on whatever school. If you want to, for example, criticize WashU for traditionally catering to the rich, that's fair. But posting verifiably incorrect facts does not constitute a "perspective." It's intentionally misleading and creepy.

And I don't think you've actually grasped the concept of astroturfing. The point is that it doesn't involve the exchange of several different "perspectives" (plural) from several different people. This is a single person continually expressing the same perspective as if several different people were expressing that perspective. I don't see how that does anyone any good.