Do you sext?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, you mean have two cameras? Take a photo of a phone screen? Um, that sounds far fetched.

And how amazing must the average person look for all that effort ?

Is this sarcasm?

You are probably not worth the effort fetching a second phone in the moment.

But you do recognize that a second phone being nearby is not some incredibly unusual situation, right? It has absolutely nothing to do with the pic being “worth the effort”.

[Anonymous]

Ok, you are right. Being correct is most important. I’ll leave you alone with your sexy thoughts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You are probably not worth the effort fetching a second phone in the moment

DP.

Few people are worth the effort to hack private photos or text conversations. They are also uninterested if they receive a photo by mistake. If the photo belongs to Jennifer Lawrence or Kate Upton, it is a different story.

However, if you are a suburban DCUM mom who sent her husband a racy pic, no one cares. If you are a divorced DCUM mom who sent her BF a racy pic, no one cares. All the posters in this thread who have been posting "I would never send ____ because they might get out", you do not need to worry. The only person interested is the person you sent them to.

How often have you heard of someone in your neighborhood having photos/text spread around? I have never seen it happen.

It is human nature to believe that the world is interested in a spicy pic of you when, in fact, it is not. Sadly, it is second nature on this board to believe you are way more important than you are.

NP. Revenge porn has nothing to do with being important. Logical reasoning is not your strong suit.

[Anonymous]

I don't. Not because I think I'm important or even think there's risk involved but because it makes me uncomfortable. Maybe it's generational?

Got ghosted on OLD a few times because I wouldn't sext/send pics and that's fine. It's ok to set boundaries and ok if those boundaries don't work for the other person.

[Anonymous]

It’s definitely generational
There is also wide gradation of images / words
and levels of trust

[Anonymous]

Who read the Jonah Hill text messages ??
GF certainly took her revenge. That was very poor taste — The lesser known sports star GF benefitted … She didn’t even leak photos, just intimate conversations!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

NP. Revenge porn has nothing to do with being important. Logical reasoning is not your strong suit.

Exactly. Why married people only date married people.

[Anonymous]

NP. Revenge porn has nothing to do with being important. Logical reasoning is not your strong suit.

Revenge porn is a crime. If you are sending photos to someone who would break the law to harm you, you have bigger problems than a concern about what "might get out."

My reasoning is stronger than yours. But that is a very low threshold to exceed if you date people who would illegally weaponize information you gave them. And if being the subject of revenge porn is a concern of yours, you told us all we need to know about the kind of men you date.

[Anonymous]

But someone might take a picture of a picture —and then post that nuddy picture to their 39 Facebook friends, all over 40 years old!

[Anonymous]

I pretty sure this age demo has zero overlap with the revenge porn demographic.

But people worry about risks all of the time. Worriers gonna worry.

[Anonymous]

I pretty sure this age demo has zero overlap with the revenge porn demographic.

But people worry about risks all of the time. Worriers gonna worry.

I guess so. I think it is the classic DCUM self-importance. For the majority demographic on here, no one will expend any real effort to see a spicy photo of them.

And, many of the men on here have professional licenses (to practice law, medicine, etc.) that they could lose because of a revenge porn charge.