So true! Mine is like this and it makes me so sad that other college students can't see her for the amazing person she is. |
|
When just evaluating raw stats (grades + test scores), there is less divergence between Ivy/Ivy+ admits, and T50 public universities - especially in STEM. So, to get into top privates, students need contrived BS to differentiate themselves.
Furthermore, as prices for privates moves closer to $100k per year, high quality non-wealthy students are piling into publics, thus driving up admission requirements. When kids with >1525 (SAT), heavy ECs, high GPA, etc. are getting rejected from CS at UMD (just one example), it's obvious that things are changing. If we fast-forward 20 years, I wonder if Ivy League will be as elite (as compared to publics) as it's perceived today. |
We're having that discussion with our high schooler now. Not sure the Ivy prestige will continue. |
It's already happening with less elite privates (there was another thread on this topic). Why pay $80k a year for a school barely in top 100 when good public options exist with stronger programs and great outcomes? |
That's really cool. Does your kid still write? |
Both my kid and friend had great pointy narratives. My kid as a blend of arts and stem interests, friend focused on service, starting with home situation that inspired passion for blend of economics and service. Neither was a shenanigan. These were authentic. The supposition that it's all curated or a sham is whack. That may be true for some but not the majority. Many of the friends at my kid's college are genuinely pointy or multi-spikey. Interesting, bright, talented people. |