Who brought the coke to the WH?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To clear up the mystery - here's a map, showing a red arrow for the entrance, and a red circle where it was found

In updating where the cocaine was found, officials said that area was also heavily trafficked.

The cocaine was found in an entrance area between the foyer and a lower-level lobby, the sources said. The entrance is near where some vehicles, like the vice president’s limo or SUV, park. It is one floor below the main West Wing offices and on the same floor as the Situation Room and a dining area.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/cocaine-found-white-house-was-different-location-previously-reported-s-rcna92906

And? So?

People who keep suggesting it was "at the Situation Room" are off by many rooms. People who keep suggesting it was in some highly secure location inaccessible to anyone but the First Family and some select handful of staffers are also incorrect. It was right in the midst of a main drag where hundreds of officials, staffers, tourists, visitors and other people pass through all day. It busts the suggestions that it somehow "had to be" Hunter or someone else with extraordinary access.

Tourists don’t go to the west wing. Visitors closely connected to senior officials might go, especially over a weekend like this but never random tourists. The West Wing is small and trafficked by a core group of senior officials (and not usually the family).

And everything and every person is closely tracked BEFORE and DURING a admittance.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

Ha. This is the White House, not some private location. We have a right to know about EVERYTHING that goes on in the working portion of that building (which this was) and in many of the private sections.

Totally weird take. You must be trolling.

And I bet its not just the secret service who has the list of people who have been in the West Wing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

And yes, “we” do; WH visitor logs are published.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

And yes, “we” do; WH visitor logs are published.

except when you're either Dubya or TFG

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

And yes, “we” do; WH visitor logs are published.

Can we share that here? ….Like the lolita logs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

And yes, “we” do; WH visitor logs are published.

except when you're either Dubya or TFG

Or you move all of your meetings to Compass Coffee to achieve faux disclosure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

Ha. This is the White House, not some private location. We have a right to know about EVERYTHING that goes on in the working portion of that building (which this was) and in many of the private sections.

Totally weird take. You must be trolling.

And I bet its not just the secret service who has the list of people who have been in the West Wing.

I personally don’t care about this story.

And I’m someone who has never even smoked marijuana, much less taken any harder drugs.

I just do not care. Unless it turns out to be planted by SS. That would make it an interesting story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

Ha. This is the White House, not some private location. We have a right to know about EVERYTHING that goes on in the working portion of that building (which this was) and in many of the private sections.

Totally weird take. You must be trolling.

And I bet its not just the secret service who has the list of people who have been in the West Wing.

I am not trolling. I am interested in facts, not innuendo. Please enlighten me about where it says that the public has the right to know "EVERYTHING that goes on in the working portion of that building (which this was) and in many of the private sections" of the WH. I can understand if there was a threat to the safety and security of the individuals working and living in the WH, but how does a discarded/forgotten/dropped bag (or whatever) of cocaine that was found not to be anthrax pose a danger to people in the WH? And why is it a public matter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting timing. Secret Service "finds" cocaine at the exact time that a criminal investigation is opened into Secret Service destruction of evidence and deletion of J6 text messages. And, I don't think any of the Trump loyalists involved have yet been purged from the White House.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/dhs-launched-criminal-probe-destruction-jan-6-secret-service-text-mess-rcna39392

My working theory: Trump-loyal SS planted the cocaine as retaliation for the investigation.

It's interesting that the Secret Service supposedly found it, was then vague about where it was found, and now is trying to claim they might not be able to know who it was, despite having logs and plenty of video, and apparently aren't bothering with any forensics like fingerprints on the bag. It's like they don't want to prove who it was, they just wanted the implication that it was Hunter. Despite Hunter not even being there when the baggie appeared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting timing. Secret Service "finds" cocaine at the exact time that a criminal investigation is opened into Secret Service destruction of evidence and deletion of J6 text messages. And, I don't think any of the Trump loyalists involved have yet been purged from the White House.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/dhs-launched-criminal-probe-destruction-jan-6-secret-service-text-mess-rcna39392

My working theory: Trump-loyal SS planted the cocaine as retaliation for the investigation.

It's interesting that the Secret Service supposedly found it, was then vague about where it was found, and now is trying to claim they might not be able to know who it was, despite having logs and plenty of video, and apparently aren't bothering with any forensics like fingerprints on the bag. It's like they don't want to prove who it was, they just wanted the implication that it was Hunter. Despite Hunter not even being there when the baggie appeared.

I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out some SS agent planted it, pretended to find it and suggested it was Hunter's - but then it got out of hand because people not in on the stunt called in a Hazmat team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No evidence that there were hundreds of people there over the weekend.

No evidence it was Hunter... who wasn't even there over the weekend.

True, but we have no idea how long it was there before it was found.

You're right about one thing: "we have no idea." None of us do.

Well, we have some idea. The name of everyone who has been in that area is on a list.

No, "we" don't have "some idea"--only the LE officials and others involved in the investigation have some idea. And even if they know exactly who brought it in, is it our right as citizens to know who did it? If someone were caught with drugs in your place of employment, should all staff be automatically informed of the person's identity? Who was harmed by this incident?

Ha. This is the White House, not some private location. We have a right to know about EVERYTHING that goes on in the working portion of that building (which this was) and in many of the private sections.

Totally weird take. You must be trolling.

And I bet its not just the secret service who has the list of people who have been in the West Wing.

I am not trolling. I am interested in facts, not innuendo. Please enlighten me about where it says that the public has the right to know "EVERYTHING that goes on in the working portion of that building (which this was) and in many of the private sections" of the WH. I can understand if there was a threat to the safety and security of the individuals working and living in the WH, but how does a discarded/forgotten/dropped bag (or whatever) of cocaine that was found not to be anthrax pose a danger to people in the WH? And why is it a public matter?

I believe every person who visits the WH should be made public let alone the presence of Schedule 2 drugs. I don’t care who is President.