King Charles evicts Harry and Meghan from Frogmore

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure how he can publish a tell-all, disparage his family, profit off this betrayal and expect the royal treatment when he returns for a visit. Is he that entitled to expect the taxpayers to continue to pay for him? These are the consequences of his actions.

But apparently no consequences for Andrew and Fergie! Hmmm.

That's a silly take.

How do? Are you aware of everything Andrew and Fergie have done over the years (Andrew being the worst by far)? If this decision is a consequence for what Harry has done, it sure seems like Charles is being hypocritical in favoring his disgraced brother and his ex-wife over his own son. Super petty.

Downsizing Andrew (who has already been PNGed) as a consequence to Harry? That's convoluted.

No. The point is that Andrew has faced little consequence for what he’s done, especially in comparison to what Harry has done and the consequences he’s faced. Charles and the rest of the family are clearly fine continuing to support and engage with Andrew but not Harry. The disparate treatment indicates that they care more about punishing Harry. This is yet another example of that.

The consequences that Harry has faced? Loss of a cottage he doesn't live in and that his wife hates? Poor Harry.

And Andrew has faced consequences that Elizabeth sort of waved in her last years - that doesn't reflect on Charles one way or the other.

It was his bachelor pad she didn’t like, two bedrooms and he was constantly hitting his head on the door frames. Frogmore was given to them by the Queen after they got married.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband has this kind of dysfunctional family. (Not the royal part but the rest of it). There are families that TRULY favor one child more than the other and TRULY are this mean, spiteful and vindictive. If you don’t believe Charles is doing this just to be a dick, well, you haven’t lived through it.

Maybe if you make millions writing an expose on your family, you get what you deserve?

Other than William hitting him, did he he really say or release anything that had not already been in the press? He just finally gave his side of the story.

Oh, lots. He said his kill number, the scent of his down-there, etc. Totally nutso stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure how he can publish a tell-all, disparage his family, profit off this betrayal and expect the royal treatment when he returns for a visit. Is he that entitled to expect the taxpayers to continue to pay for him? These are the consequences of his actions.

But apparently no consequences for Andrew and Fergie! Hmmm.

That's a silly take.

How do? Are you aware of everything Andrew and Fergie have done over the years (Andrew being the worst by far)? If this decision is a consequence for what Harry has done, it sure seems like Charles is being hypocritical in favoring his disgraced brother and his ex-wife over his own son. Super petty.

Downsizing Andrew (who has already been PNGed) as a consequence to Harry? That's convoluted.

No. The point is that Andrew has faced little consequence for what he’s done, especially in comparison to what Harry has done and the consequences he’s faced. Charles and the rest of the family are clearly fine continuing to support and engage with Andrew but not Harry. The disparate treatment indicates that they care more about punishing Harry. This is yet another example of that.

Andrew's consequence is loss of stature, which is the only thing that he's ever really cared about. Royal Lodge requires lots of money for repair, which he can't afford. He's being forcibly downsized b/c he has no money and the royal bank closed when his mom died.

Is that true though? I find it hard to believe he didn’t inherit anything when she died.

I'm sure he inherited money, which he would have to pay tax on as only direct inheritance to the next sovereign is tax free. But I don't think he can go to Charles and ask for more money to pay for upkeep on the Royal Lodge or to fund his ski trips to Switzerland. What he got from his parents is what he has got to live on now.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/13/king-charles-will-not-pay-tax-on-inheritance-from-the-queen

[Anonymous]

Why CAN'T Harry write a book? Fergie wrote a book. Diana gave a tell all interview. Why is everyone so mad about Harry's book?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why CAN'T Harry write a book? Fergie wrote a book. Diana gave a tell all interview. Why is everyone so mad about Harry's book?

I read Fergie's book years ago, it was mostly about her and her experiences, not an attack on others. And Diana's tell-all interview, well...

[Anonymous]

Meghan didn't even like Frogmore. She emphasized how small it was, citing Oprah. If they want to visit the UK and have security, they can no doubt stay quite comfortably in Buckingham Palace. It's not as if they will be on an air mattress.

Charles' objective is to preserve the monarchy. And to do that, he needs to streamline and reduce the taxpayer support provided to the less senior royals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agreed with OP. and prince andrew is moving in? It’s laughable how much more willing Charles is to take care of a serious sex offender than his own son and grandchildren, all because one person is more willing to keep his mouth shut and kiss Charles’s a**. Honestly, gross Charles. Clearly a terrible father with serious narcissistic issues.

+1

This is crazy! Charles said he won't leave his brother homeless and penniless.... but he has no trouble doing that to his son.

He's mad about the book and Harry has other homes, and has retired from the royal family.

if Harry is even Charles' son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband has this kind of dysfunctional family. (Not the royal part but the rest of it). There are families that TRULY favor one child more than the other and TRULY are this mean, spiteful and vindictive. If you don’t believe Charles is doing this just to be a dick, well, you haven’t lived through it.

Maybe if you make millions writing an expose on your family, you get what you deserve?

Other than William hitting him, did he he really say or release anything that had not already been in the press? He just finally gave his side of the story.

Oh, lots. He said his kill number, the scent of his down-there, etc. Totally nutso stuff.

That’s stuff about him, not the RF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan didn't even like Frogmore. She emphasized how small it was, citing Oprah. If they want to visit the UK and have security, they can no doubt stay quite comfortably in Buckingham Palace. It's not as if they will be on an air mattress.

Charles' objective is to preserve the monarchy. And to do that, he needs to streamline and reduce the taxpayer support provided to the less senior royals.

She wasn’t complaining about Frogmore, it was the bachelor pad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agreed with OP. and prince andrew is moving in? It’s laughable how much more willing Charles is to take care of a serious sex offender than his own son and grandchildren, all because one person is more willing to keep his mouth shut and kiss Charles’s a**. Honestly, gross Charles. Clearly a terrible father with serious narcissistic issues.

+1

This is crazy! Charles said he won't leave his brother homeless and penniless.... but he has no trouble doing that to his son.

He's mad about the book and Harry has other homes, and has retired from the royal family.

if Harry is even Charles' son.

Charles IS Harry's son, and he raised him, and you all are acting like Charles has done NOTHING wrong.

[Anonymous]

So either Charles isn’t inviting them to the Coronation or they turned down the invite,

[Anonymous]

There's 92 bedrooms at Windsor Castle and nearly 200 more for staff. I'm sure that they could find a bunk somewhere. If William and Kate are moving from their four bedroom place, maybe that will be used as a guest house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agreed with OP. and prince andrew is moving in? It’s laughable how much more willing Charles is to take care of a serious sex offender than his own son and grandchildren, all because one person is more willing to keep his mouth shut and kiss Charles’s a**. Honestly, gross Charles. Clearly a terrible father with serious narcissistic issues.

+1

This is crazy! Charles said he won't leave his brother homeless and penniless.... but he has no trouble doing that to his son.

He's mad about the book and Harry has other homes, and has retired from the royal family.

if Harry is even Charles' son.

Charles IS Harry's son, and he raised him, and you all are acting like Charles has done NOTHING wrong.

Sorry Harry is Charles son.

[Anonymous]

Making Camilla queen is an insult to his kids and the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Making Camilla queen is an insult to his kids and the public.

How?