Sarah H Sanders

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was pretty obvious who the crazy people were during the SOTU.

+1 many people are saying she’s the crazy one.

“It got pretty dark and weird," Austin Bailey wrote in an editorial at the Arkansas Times. "A word salad of talking points and name calling, with some attempts at folksy relatability thrown in, Sanders' rebuttal to Biden's State of the Union address was light on policy, heavy on menace."

Conservative commentator Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, contrasted Biden's speech focused on "the economy and concrete issues" with Sanders' "deep plunge into dystopian culture wars."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/she-s-not-intellectually-capable-knives-out-in-trumpworld-over-sanders-terrible-sotu-response/ar-AA17i9I5?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=9c750e94b06347b39385ff2034451a8b

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was pretty obvious who the crazy people were during the SOTU.

+1 many people are saying she’s the crazy one.

“It got pretty dark and weird," Austin Bailey wrote in an editorial at the Arkansas Times. "A word salad of talking points and name calling, with some attempts at folksy relatability thrown in, Sanders' rebuttal to Biden's State of the Union address was light on policy, heavy on menace."

Conservative commentator Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, contrasted Biden's speech focused on "the economy and concrete issues" with Sanders' "deep plunge into dystopian culture wars."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/she-s-not-intellectually-capable-knives-out-in-trumpworld-over-sanders-terrible-sotu-response/ar-AA17i9I5?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=9c750e94b06347b39385ff2034451a8b

So 2 = "many"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was pretty obvious who the crazy people were during the SOTU.

+1 many people are saying she’s the crazy one.

“It got pretty dark and weird," Austin Bailey wrote in an editorial at the Arkansas Times. "A word salad of talking points and name calling, with some attempts at folksy relatability thrown in, Sanders' rebuttal to Biden's State of the Union address was light on policy, heavy on menace."

Conservative commentator Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, contrasted Biden's speech focused on "the economy and concrete issues" with Sanders' "deep plunge into dystopian culture wars."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/she-s-not-intellectually-capable-knives-out-in-trumpworld-over-sanders-terrible-sotu-response/ar-AA17i9I5?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=9c750e94b06347b39385ff2034451a8b

So 2 = "many"?

Do I really have to explain “many people are saying” to you, a poster on the political forum?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

Still, an apt description of trumpers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

What else would you call anti democratic insurrectionist white supremacists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

What else would you call anti democratic insurrectionist white supremacists?

Indeed! White trash who tore down the Capitol are deplorables.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

You guys happily hopped in that basket! You bragged about it! You wore t shirts!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

You guys happily hopped in that basket! You bragged about it! You wore t shirts!

+1 and learn what dehumanizing language is, because “deplorable” ain’t it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

You guys happily hopped in that basket! You bragged about it! You wore t shirts!

+1 and learn what dehumanizing language is, because “deplorable” ain’t it.

+1. Try reading this article to better understand what dehumanizing language is and why it leads to escalating violence: https://headtopics.com/us/as-right-wing-rhetoric-escalates-so-do-threats-and-violence-28968938

[Anonymous]

I remember when the restaurant in Lexington refused to serve her and her family and they were asked to leave.

Sarah Sanders was gracious and she made the public aware of the owner's actions.

I am sure the owner would do it again... because she is THAT petty.

Glad that Sarah Sanders won the election in AR. Wonder how that restaurant owner is doing today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I remember when the restaurant in Lexington refused to serve her and her family and they were asked to leave.

Sarah Sanders was gracious and she made the public aware of the owner's actions.

I am sure the owner would do it again... because she is THAT petty.

Glad that Sarah Sanders won the election in AR. Wonder how that restaurant owner is doing today.

https://www.redhenlex.com/

Looks like her restaurant is still alive and kicking. And she sleeps easier at night knowing that she didn't lie, manipulate, or debase herself to pursue power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I remember when the restaurant in Lexington refused to serve her and her family and they were asked to leave.

Sarah Sanders was gracious and she made the public aware of the owner's actions.

I am sure the owner would do it again... because she is THAT petty.

Glad that Sarah Sanders won the election in AR. Wonder how that restaurant owner is doing today.

If she was that gracious, she wouldn’t have told the public about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I remember when the restaurant in Lexington refused to serve her and her family and they were asked to leave.

Sarah Sanders was gracious and she made the public aware of the owner's actions.

I am sure the owner would do it again... because she is THAT petty.

Glad that Sarah Sanders won the election in AR. Wonder how that restaurant owner is doing today.

https://www.redhenlex.com/

Looks like her restaurant is still alive and kicking. And she sleeps easier at night knowing that she didn't lie, manipulate, or debase herself to pursue power.

It actually looks like some of the reviews are less than glowing. Wishing her all that she deserves!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would agree with this ^^. And I think she looks great.

Dehumanizing wide swaths of your fellow citizens in your personal quest for political power by using language that stigmatizes mental health is not laudable behavior.

And yet, if the shoe fits… besides, HRC had no compunctions about dehumanizing wide swaths of fellow citizens in her own quest for political power, did she? “Basket of deplorables,” etc.

What else would you call anti democratic insurrectionist white supremacists?

Good and valid point. Not many other words capture the insanity …

That said, I don’t think it is right to diss Governor Sanders based on her appearance or weight. I don’t agree with anything she said but she represents a large section of the US in ways they are comfortable with .

She did have the best line of the night, it was just dripping in irony …